不确定来源的年轻人栓塞性卒中(ESUS)的特征和结局:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Stroke Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2019-12-03 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/4360787
Ali M Al Khathaami, Bayan Al Bdah, Abdulmjeed Alnosair, Abdulkarim Alturki, Rayan Alrebdi, Shorug Alwayili, Sulaiman Alhamzah, Fahad A M AlKhathaami, Nasser Alotaibi
{"title":"不确定来源的年轻人栓塞性卒中(ESUS)的特征和结局:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Ali M Al Khathaami,&nbsp;Bayan Al Bdah,&nbsp;Abdulmjeed Alnosair,&nbsp;Abdulkarim Alturki,&nbsp;Rayan Alrebdi,&nbsp;Shorug Alwayili,&nbsp;Sulaiman Alhamzah,&nbsp;Fahad A M AlKhathaami,&nbsp;Nasser Alotaibi","doi":"10.1155/2019/4360787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) in younger adults may have different risk factors compared with ESUS in elderly, and the approach to ESUS in young adults may require new therapies. We aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes in younger adults with ESUS at a single centre in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of younger adults with ESUS according to the criteria of the Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Younger adults (aged ≤50 years) with ESUS were compared with older patients, on admission and discharge from hospital, using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 147 patients with ESUS, 39 (26.5%) were younger adults. Younger adults compared with older adults with ESUS had fewer vascular risk factors, including lower rates of hypertension (43.6% vs. 70.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.004), diabetes (35.9% vs. 57.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.03), and dyslipidaemia (12.8% vs. 28.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.05). There was no significant difference in poor outcome at discharge (defined as mRS > 2), which was observed in 17.9% of younger adults and 28.7% of older adults. Further, there were no significant differences in stroke severity at discharge (NIHSS score ≤5) or median length of stay.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the outcomes of ESUS do not differ between younger and older patients, younger patients have fewer identified risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that 26.5% of patients with ESUS were aged ≤50  years. Although younger adults with ESUS had fewer risk factors, there were no significant differences in neurologic disability or mortality at discharge, stroke severity, or median length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":"2019 ","pages":"4360787"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/4360787","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and Outcomes of Younger Adults with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS): A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ali M Al Khathaami,&nbsp;Bayan Al Bdah,&nbsp;Abdulmjeed Alnosair,&nbsp;Abdulkarim Alturki,&nbsp;Rayan Alrebdi,&nbsp;Shorug Alwayili,&nbsp;Sulaiman Alhamzah,&nbsp;Fahad A M AlKhathaami,&nbsp;Nasser Alotaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2019/4360787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) in younger adults may have different risk factors compared with ESUS in elderly, and the approach to ESUS in young adults may require new therapies. We aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes in younger adults with ESUS at a single centre in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of younger adults with ESUS according to the criteria of the Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Younger adults (aged ≤50 years) with ESUS were compared with older patients, on admission and discharge from hospital, using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 147 patients with ESUS, 39 (26.5%) were younger adults. Younger adults compared with older adults with ESUS had fewer vascular risk factors, including lower rates of hypertension (43.6% vs. 70.3%; <i>P</i> = 0.004), diabetes (35.9% vs. 57.4%; <i>P</i> = 0.03), and dyslipidaemia (12.8% vs. 28.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.05). There was no significant difference in poor outcome at discharge (defined as mRS > 2), which was observed in 17.9% of younger adults and 28.7% of older adults. Further, there were no significant differences in stroke severity at discharge (NIHSS score ≤5) or median length of stay.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although the outcomes of ESUS do not differ between younger and older patients, younger patients have fewer identified risk factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that 26.5% of patients with ESUS were aged ≤50  years. Although younger adults with ESUS had fewer risk factors, there were no significant differences in neurologic disability or mortality at discharge, stroke severity, or median length of stay.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"2019 \",\"pages\":\"4360787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/4360787\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4360787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4360787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

与老年人的ESUS相比,年轻人的不明来源栓塞性卒中(ESUS)可能有不同的危险因素,年轻人的ESUS可能需要新的治疗方法。我们的目的是在沙特阿拉伯的一个中心调查年轻成人ESUS的特征和结果。患者和方法:根据隐源性卒中/ESUS国际工作组的标准,使用年轻ESUS患者的医疗记录进行回顾性研究。采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)和美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)对ESUS患者(年龄≤50岁)与老年患者在入院和出院时进行比较。结果:147例ESUS患者中,39例(26.5%)为年轻人。与患有ESUS的老年人相比,年轻人的血管危险因素更少,包括高血压发病率更低(43.6%比70.3%;P = 0.004),糖尿病(35.9% vs. 57.4%;P = 0.03),血脂异常(12.8% vs. 28.7%;P = 0.05)。出院时不良预后(定义为mRS > 2)无显著差异,17.9%的年轻人和28.7%的老年人出现不良预后。此外,两组在出院时卒中严重程度(NIHSS评分≤5)或中位住院时间方面无显著差异。讨论:尽管ESUS的结果在年轻患者和老年患者之间没有差异,但年轻患者确定的危险因素较少。结论:26.5%的ESUS患者年龄≤50岁。虽然患有ESUS的年轻成人的危险因素较少,但在神经功能障碍或出院时死亡率、中风严重程度或中位住院时间方面没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characteristics and Outcomes of Younger Adults with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS): A Retrospective Study.

Introduction: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) in younger adults may have different risk factors compared with ESUS in elderly, and the approach to ESUS in young adults may require new therapies. We aimed to investigate the characteristics and outcomes in younger adults with ESUS at a single centre in Saudi Arabia.

Patients and methods: A retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of younger adults with ESUS according to the criteria of the Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Younger adults (aged ≤50 years) with ESUS were compared with older patients, on admission and discharge from hospital, using the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).

Results: Among 147 patients with ESUS, 39 (26.5%) were younger adults. Younger adults compared with older adults with ESUS had fewer vascular risk factors, including lower rates of hypertension (43.6% vs. 70.3%; P = 0.004), diabetes (35.9% vs. 57.4%; P = 0.03), and dyslipidaemia (12.8% vs. 28.7%; P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in poor outcome at discharge (defined as mRS > 2), which was observed in 17.9% of younger adults and 28.7% of older adults. Further, there were no significant differences in stroke severity at discharge (NIHSS score ≤5) or median length of stay.

Discussion: Although the outcomes of ESUS do not differ between younger and older patients, younger patients have fewer identified risk factors.

Conclusion: This study showed that 26.5% of patients with ESUS were aged ≤50  years. Although younger adults with ESUS had fewer risk factors, there were no significant differences in neurologic disability or mortality at discharge, stroke severity, or median length of stay.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke Research and Treatment
Stroke Research and Treatment PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Increasing or Decreasing Use of Polypharmacy on Recovery of Activities of Daily Living in Patients With Stroke in the Recovery-Phase Rehabilitation Ward: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Propensity Score Matching. Does Action Observation of the Whole Task Influence Mirror Neuron System and Upper Limb Muscle Activity Better Than Part Task in People With Stroke? Evaluation of Contralateral Limb Cross Education and High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Functional Indices of the Affected Upper Limb in Subacute Phase of Stroke External Validation of SAFE Score to Predict Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis after Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Multicenter Study Modeling Survival Time to Death among Stroke Patients at Jimma University Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1