淋巴细胞增强因子1表达和血清半凝集素3对埃及AML患者预后的影响。

Q3 Medicine Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2019-12-18 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2019/2352919
M A ElBaiomy, S Aref, M El Zaafarany, Sara Atwa, Tamer Akl, Wafaa El-Beshbishi, Shaimaa El-Ashwah, L Ibrahim, M El-Ghonemy
{"title":"淋巴细胞增强因子1表达和血清半凝集素3对埃及AML患者预后的影响。","authors":"M A ElBaiomy,&nbsp;S Aref,&nbsp;M El Zaafarany,&nbsp;Sara Atwa,&nbsp;Tamer Akl,&nbsp;Wafaa El-Beshbishi,&nbsp;Shaimaa El-Ashwah,&nbsp;L Ibrahim,&nbsp;M El-Ghonemy","doi":"10.1155/2019/2352919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway had a role in haematological malignancies. Previous studies reported that lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1) expression and serum Galectin-3 level could affect clinical parameters and outcome in acute myeloid leukemia patients, but as far as we know, no study has addressed their combined effect on AML patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We studied the expression of LEF1 by real-time qPCR and measured serum level of Gal.3 by ELISA technique in peripheral blood of 69 AML patients and correlated it with different clinicopathological criteria of patients, response, PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found high expression (LEF1<sup>high</sup>) was associated with better OS (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and EFS (<i>p</i> = 0.019) compared to LEF1<sup>low</sup>, low serum Gal.3 level had better OS (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and EFS (<i>p</i> = 0.02) compared to high serum Gal.3 level. LEF1<sup>high</sup> less likely to carry a FLT3-ITD (<i>p</i> = 0.047) compared to LEF1<sup>low</sup> patient, also LEF1<sup>high</sup> characterized by favorable risk (<i>p</i> = 0.02) than LEF1<sup>low</sup> patients. While patients with higher Gal-3 levels characterized by poor risk (<i>p</i> = 0.02) than lower Gal.3 lels, also more likely to carry a FLT3-ITD with borderline significance (<i>p</i> = 0.054). Combined LEF1<sup>high</sup>/Gal.3 low patients had lower baseline blast percentages (<i>p</i> = 0.02), favorable risk (<i>p</i> = 0.01), less likely to carry FLT3-ITD (<i>p</i> = 0.02), higher CR rate (<i>p</i> = 0.055), shorter time to CR (0.001) than other groups. Among high Gal.3 level group, LEF1<sup>high</sup>expression improved OS and EFS (20 and 15 months respectively) vs LEF1<sup>low</sup> expression (13 and 8 months respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that high LEF1 expression was a favorable prognostic marker which can define AML patient risk and outcome independent from assessing the serum galectin.3 level.</p>","PeriodicalId":7325,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Hematology","volume":"2019 ","pages":"2352919"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/2352919","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Impact of Lymphoid Enhancer Factor 1 Expression and Serum Galectin.3 in Egyptian AML Patients.\",\"authors\":\"M A ElBaiomy,&nbsp;S Aref,&nbsp;M El Zaafarany,&nbsp;Sara Atwa,&nbsp;Tamer Akl,&nbsp;Wafaa El-Beshbishi,&nbsp;Shaimaa El-Ashwah,&nbsp;L Ibrahim,&nbsp;M El-Ghonemy\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2019/2352919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway had a role in haematological malignancies. Previous studies reported that lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1) expression and serum Galectin-3 level could affect clinical parameters and outcome in acute myeloid leukemia patients, but as far as we know, no study has addressed their combined effect on AML patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We studied the expression of LEF1 by real-time qPCR and measured serum level of Gal.3 by ELISA technique in peripheral blood of 69 AML patients and correlated it with different clinicopathological criteria of patients, response, PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found high expression (LEF1<sup>high</sup>) was associated with better OS (<i>p</i> = 0.02) and EFS (<i>p</i> = 0.019) compared to LEF1<sup>low</sup>, low serum Gal.3 level had better OS (<i>p</i> = 0.014) and EFS (<i>p</i> = 0.02) compared to high serum Gal.3 level. LEF1<sup>high</sup> less likely to carry a FLT3-ITD (<i>p</i> = 0.047) compared to LEF1<sup>low</sup> patient, also LEF1<sup>high</sup> characterized by favorable risk (<i>p</i> = 0.02) than LEF1<sup>low</sup> patients. While patients with higher Gal-3 levels characterized by poor risk (<i>p</i> = 0.02) than lower Gal.3 lels, also more likely to carry a FLT3-ITD with borderline significance (<i>p</i> = 0.054). Combined LEF1<sup>high</sup>/Gal.3 low patients had lower baseline blast percentages (<i>p</i> = 0.02), favorable risk (<i>p</i> = 0.01), less likely to carry FLT3-ITD (<i>p</i> = 0.02), higher CR rate (<i>p</i> = 0.055), shorter time to CR (0.001) than other groups. Among high Gal.3 level group, LEF1<sup>high</sup>expression improved OS and EFS (20 and 15 months respectively) vs LEF1<sup>low</sup> expression (13 and 8 months respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that high LEF1 expression was a favorable prognostic marker which can define AML patient risk and outcome independent from assessing the serum galectin.3 level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Hematology\",\"volume\":\"2019 \",\"pages\":\"2352919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2019/2352919\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2352919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2352919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:Wnt信号通路的解除在血液恶性肿瘤中起作用。以往的研究报道了淋巴细胞增强因子1 (LEF1)表达和血清半凝集素-3水平可影响急性髓系白血病患者的临床参数和预后,但据我们所知,尚未有研究探讨它们对急性髓系白血病患者的联合影响。目的:采用实时荧光定量pcr (real-time qPCR)技术研究69例AML患者外周血中LEF1的表达,ELISA技术检测血清中gal3的水平,并将其与患者不同临床病理标准、疗效、PFS和OS进行相关性分析。结果:与LEF1low相比,高表达(LEF1high)与更好的OS (p = 0.02)和EFS (p = 0.019)相关,与高表达(gal3)相比,低表达(LEF1high)与更好的OS (p = 0.014)和EFS (p = 0.02)相关。与LEF1low患者相比,LEF1high患者携带FLT3-ITD的可能性更低(p = 0.047), LEF1high患者也比LEF1low患者具有有利的风险(p = 0.02)。虽然Gal-3水平较高的患者比Gal.3水平较低的患者风险较低(p = 0.02),但也更容易携带FLT3-ITD,具有临界意义(p = 0.054)。结合LEF1high /加。与其他组相比,3例低组患者的基线爆炸百分率较低(p = 0.02),风险较好(p = 0.01),携带FLT3-ITD的可能性较低(p = 0.02), CR率较高(p = 0.055),到达CR所需时间较短(0.001)。在高gal3水平组中,lef1high表达(20个月和15个月)比LEF1low表达(13个月和8个月)改善OS和EFS。结论:高水平的LEF1表达是一个良好的预后标志物,它可以独立于评估血清凝集素来确定AML患者的风险和预后。3级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic Impact of Lymphoid Enhancer Factor 1 Expression and Serum Galectin.3 in Egyptian AML Patients.

Background: Deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway had a role in haematological malignancies. Previous studies reported that lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1) expression and serum Galectin-3 level could affect clinical parameters and outcome in acute myeloid leukemia patients, but as far as we know, no study has addressed their combined effect on AML patients.

Aim: We studied the expression of LEF1 by real-time qPCR and measured serum level of Gal.3 by ELISA technique in peripheral blood of 69 AML patients and correlated it with different clinicopathological criteria of patients, response, PFS and OS.

Results: We found high expression (LEF1high) was associated with better OS (p = 0.02) and EFS (p = 0.019) compared to LEF1low, low serum Gal.3 level had better OS (p = 0.014) and EFS (p = 0.02) compared to high serum Gal.3 level. LEF1high less likely to carry a FLT3-ITD (p = 0.047) compared to LEF1low patient, also LEF1high characterized by favorable risk (p = 0.02) than LEF1low patients. While patients with higher Gal-3 levels characterized by poor risk (p = 0.02) than lower Gal.3 lels, also more likely to carry a FLT3-ITD with borderline significance (p = 0.054). Combined LEF1high/Gal.3 low patients had lower baseline blast percentages (p = 0.02), favorable risk (p = 0.01), less likely to carry FLT3-ITD (p = 0.02), higher CR rate (p = 0.055), shorter time to CR (0.001) than other groups. Among high Gal.3 level group, LEF1highexpression improved OS and EFS (20 and 15 months respectively) vs LEF1low expression (13 and 8 months respectively).

Conclusion: We conclude that high LEF1 expression was a favorable prognostic marker which can define AML patient risk and outcome independent from assessing the serum galectin.3 level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Hematology
Advances in Hematology Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Variability in Notification of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Sickle Cell Trait Across the United States. Early Molecular Response to Imatinib First-Line Therapy and Predictive Factors of Poor Outcomes for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Côte d'Ivoire. Relationships Between Markers of Iron Status and Hematological Parameters in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease. A Comparative Analysis of Hydroxyurea Treatment on Coagulation Profile Among Sickle Cell Anaemia Children in Lagos, Nigeria. Advancements in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: From Signaling Pathways to Targeted Therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1