第十章:益生菌与蛀牙。

Q2 Dentistry Monographs in Oral Science Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-11-07 DOI:10.1159/000455377
Pamela Hasslöf, Christina Stecksén-Blicks
{"title":"第十章:益生菌与蛀牙。","authors":"Pamela Hasslöf,&nbsp;Christina Stecksén-Blicks","doi":"10.1159/000455377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization has defined probiotics as \"Live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit to the host.\" Traditionally, probiotic microorganisms (mainly Lactobacillus ssp. and Bifidobacterium ssp.) have been used to prevent or treat diseases in the gastrointestinal tract. In the past 20 years, there has been an increased interest in possible oral health effects of probiotics. In vitro studies have shown promising results with growth inhibition of mutans streptococci (MS) and Candida albicans. There are only a few clinical studies with caries development as the primary outcome while more studies have been focusing on control of caries risk factors or so-called surrogate outcomes. Several studies have evaluated the effects of probiotic bacteria on MS in saliva and/or plaque, and a number of probiotic strains show ability to reduce the number of MS. Probiotic bacteria have not been shown to permanently colonize the oral cavity; in early-in-life interventions or in subjects with a mature microbiota. To date investigated strains are transiently present in saliva during and shortly after an intervention. There are eight randomized controlled clinical trials with dental caries as outcome and probiotic strains, administration, duration of the intervention, and target group varied. In a majority of the studies (75%), the interventions resulted in caries reduction in the treatment groups. Although a majority of these studies suggest a caries-preventive effect of probiotic bacteria, more long-term clinical studies are needed in this field before probiotics could be recommended for preventing or treating dental caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":"28 ","pages":"99-107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000455377","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 10: Probiotic Bacteria and Dental Caries.\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Hasslöf,&nbsp;Christina Stecksén-Blicks\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000455377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The World Health Organization has defined probiotics as \\\"Live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit to the host.\\\" Traditionally, probiotic microorganisms (mainly Lactobacillus ssp. and Bifidobacterium ssp.) have been used to prevent or treat diseases in the gastrointestinal tract. In the past 20 years, there has been an increased interest in possible oral health effects of probiotics. In vitro studies have shown promising results with growth inhibition of mutans streptococci (MS) and Candida albicans. There are only a few clinical studies with caries development as the primary outcome while more studies have been focusing on control of caries risk factors or so-called surrogate outcomes. Several studies have evaluated the effects of probiotic bacteria on MS in saliva and/or plaque, and a number of probiotic strains show ability to reduce the number of MS. Probiotic bacteria have not been shown to permanently colonize the oral cavity; in early-in-life interventions or in subjects with a mature microbiota. To date investigated strains are transiently present in saliva during and shortly after an intervention. There are eight randomized controlled clinical trials with dental caries as outcome and probiotic strains, administration, duration of the intervention, and target group varied. In a majority of the studies (75%), the interventions resulted in caries reduction in the treatment groups. Although a majority of these studies suggest a caries-preventive effect of probiotic bacteria, more long-term clinical studies are needed in this field before probiotics could be recommended for preventing or treating dental caries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"99-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000455377\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000455377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/11/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000455377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/11/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

世界卫生组织将益生菌定义为“活的微生物,当给予足够的量时,对宿主的健康有益。”传统上,益生菌微生物(主要是乳酸菌)。双歧杆菌(Bifidobacterium ssp.)被用于预防或治疗胃肠道疾病。在过去的20年里,人们对益生菌可能对口腔健康的影响越来越感兴趣。体外研究已经显示出有希望的结果与生长抑制变形链球菌(MS)和白色念珠菌。将龋齿发展作为主要结果的临床研究很少,而更多的研究关注的是龋齿风险因素的控制或所谓的替代结果。一些研究已经评估了益生菌对唾液和/或斑块中多发性硬化症的影响,许多益生菌菌株显示出减少多发性硬化症数量的能力,益生菌尚未被证明能永久定植于口腔;在生命早期干预或具有成熟微生物群的受试者中。迄今为止所调查的菌株在干预期间和干预后不久短暂存在于唾液中。有8个随机对照临床试验,以龋齿为结果,益生菌菌株、给药、干预持续时间和目标群体各不相同。在大多数研究中(75%),干预措施导致治疗组龋齿减少。虽然这些研究大多表明益生菌具有预防龋齿的作用,但在益生菌被推荐用于预防或治疗龋齿之前,还需要在这一领域进行更多的长期临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chapter 10: Probiotic Bacteria and Dental Caries.

The World Health Organization has defined probiotics as "Live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit to the host." Traditionally, probiotic microorganisms (mainly Lactobacillus ssp. and Bifidobacterium ssp.) have been used to prevent or treat diseases in the gastrointestinal tract. In the past 20 years, there has been an increased interest in possible oral health effects of probiotics. In vitro studies have shown promising results with growth inhibition of mutans streptococci (MS) and Candida albicans. There are only a few clinical studies with caries development as the primary outcome while more studies have been focusing on control of caries risk factors or so-called surrogate outcomes. Several studies have evaluated the effects of probiotic bacteria on MS in saliva and/or plaque, and a number of probiotic strains show ability to reduce the number of MS. Probiotic bacteria have not been shown to permanently colonize the oral cavity; in early-in-life interventions or in subjects with a mature microbiota. To date investigated strains are transiently present in saliva during and shortly after an intervention. There are eight randomized controlled clinical trials with dental caries as outcome and probiotic strains, administration, duration of the intervention, and target group varied. In a majority of the studies (75%), the interventions resulted in caries reduction in the treatment groups. Although a majority of these studies suggest a caries-preventive effect of probiotic bacteria, more long-term clinical studies are needed in this field before probiotics could be recommended for preventing or treating dental caries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
期刊最新文献
Chapter 8: Risk Assessment: Considerations for Coronal Caries. Chapter 9.4: Operative Treatment and Monitoring of Coronal Caries in Daily Practice. Chapter 9.3: Current Concepts of Caries Removal in Daily Practice. Chapter 9.1: The Use of Fluorides in the Control of Coronal Caries. Chapter 6: Diagnostic Considerations regarding Coronal Caries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1