假定肺结核患者的胸部x线摄影和专家MTB/RIF®检测:来自印度卡纳塔克邦一个地区的差距和挑战

Tuberculosis Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2020-01-04 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/5632810
Manjula Kanakaraju, Sharath Burugina Nagaraja, Srinath Satyanarayana, Yella Ramesh Babu, Akshaya Kibballi Madhukeshwar, Somashekar Narasimhaiah
{"title":"假定肺结核患者的胸部x线摄影和专家MTB/RIF®检测:来自印度卡纳塔克邦一个地区的差距和挑战","authors":"Manjula Kanakaraju,&nbsp;Sharath Burugina Nagaraja,&nbsp;Srinath Satyanarayana,&nbsp;Yella Ramesh Babu,&nbsp;Akshaya Kibballi Madhukeshwar,&nbsp;Somashekar Narasimhaiah","doi":"10.1155/2020/5632810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In India, as per the latest diagnostic algorithm, all persons with presumptive pulmonary TB (PPTB) are required to undergo sputum smear examination and chest radiography (CXR) upfront. Those with sputum smear positive, sputum smear negative, but CXR lesions suggestive of TB or those with strong clinical suspicion of TB are expected to undergo Xpert MTB/RIF® assay test (also known as CB-NAAT (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test)).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess what proportion of PPTB who are undergoing sputum smear examination at microscopy centers of public health facilities have undergone CXR and CB-NAAT. To explore the barriers for uptake of CXR and CB-NAAT from the public health care provider's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study in Chikkaballapur district of Karnataka State, South India. The quantitative component involved a review of records of PPTB who had undergone sputum smear examination in a representative sample of seven microscopy centers. The qualitative component involved key informant interviews with four medical officers and group interviews with 9 paramedical staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In February and March 2019, about 732 PPTB had undergone smear examination. Of these, 301 (41%) had undergone CXR and 49 (7%) had undergone CB-NAAT. The proportion of PPTB who had undergone CXR varied across the seven microscopy centers (0% to 89%). CB-NAAT was higher in PPTB from urban areas when compared to rural areas (8% vs. 3%) and in those who were smear positive when compared to smear negative (65% vs. 2%). The major barriers for CXR and CB-NAAT were nonavailability of these tests at all microscopy centers and patients' reluctance to travel to the facilities where CXR and CB-NAAT services are available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CXR and CB-NAAT of PPTB are suboptimal. RNTCP should undertake measures to address these gaps in implementing its latest diagnostic algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":30261,"journal":{"name":"Tuberculosis Research and Treatment","volume":"2020 ","pages":"5632810"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/5632810","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chest Radiography and Xpert MTB/RIF® Testing in Persons with Presumptive Pulmonary TB: Gaps and Challenges from a District in Karnataka, India.\",\"authors\":\"Manjula Kanakaraju,&nbsp;Sharath Burugina Nagaraja,&nbsp;Srinath Satyanarayana,&nbsp;Yella Ramesh Babu,&nbsp;Akshaya Kibballi Madhukeshwar,&nbsp;Somashekar Narasimhaiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/5632810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In India, as per the latest diagnostic algorithm, all persons with presumptive pulmonary TB (PPTB) are required to undergo sputum smear examination and chest radiography (CXR) upfront. Those with sputum smear positive, sputum smear negative, but CXR lesions suggestive of TB or those with strong clinical suspicion of TB are expected to undergo Xpert MTB/RIF® assay test (also known as CB-NAAT (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test)).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess what proportion of PPTB who are undergoing sputum smear examination at microscopy centers of public health facilities have undergone CXR and CB-NAAT. To explore the barriers for uptake of CXR and CB-NAAT from the public health care provider's perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study in Chikkaballapur district of Karnataka State, South India. The quantitative component involved a review of records of PPTB who had undergone sputum smear examination in a representative sample of seven microscopy centers. The qualitative component involved key informant interviews with four medical officers and group interviews with 9 paramedical staff.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In February and March 2019, about 732 PPTB had undergone smear examination. Of these, 301 (41%) had undergone CXR and 49 (7%) had undergone CB-NAAT. The proportion of PPTB who had undergone CXR varied across the seven microscopy centers (0% to 89%). CB-NAAT was higher in PPTB from urban areas when compared to rural areas (8% vs. 3%) and in those who were smear positive when compared to smear negative (65% vs. 2%). The major barriers for CXR and CB-NAAT were nonavailability of these tests at all microscopy centers and patients' reluctance to travel to the facilities where CXR and CB-NAAT services are available.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CXR and CB-NAAT of PPTB are suboptimal. RNTCP should undertake measures to address these gaps in implementing its latest diagnostic algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberculosis Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"5632810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/5632810\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberculosis Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5632810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberculosis Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5632810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在印度,根据最新的诊断算法,所有推定患有肺结核(PPTB)的人都需要预先进行痰涂片检查和胸部x光检查(CXR)。痰涂片阳性、痰涂片阴性,但CXR病变提示结核病或临床强烈怀疑结核病的患者,预计将接受Xpert MTB/RIF®测定试验(也称为CB-NAAT(卡带核酸扩增试验))。目的:评估在公共卫生机构显微镜中心接受痰涂片检查的PPTB患者中接受CXR和CB-NAAT检查的比例。从公共卫生保健提供者的角度探讨采用CXR和CB-NAAT的障碍。方法:我们在印度南部卡纳塔克邦奇卡巴拉普尔区进行了顺序解释性混合方法研究。定量部分包括对在7个显微镜中心的代表性样本中接受过痰涂片检查的PPTB记录的回顾。定性部分包括与4名医务干事进行关键信息提供者访谈和与9名辅助医务人员进行小组访谈。结果:2019年2月和3月,约732例PPTB接受了涂片检查。其中301例(41%)接受了CXR, 49例(7%)接受了CB-NAAT。在7个显微镜中心,PPTB接受CXR的比例各不相同(0%至89%)。CB-NAAT在城市地区PPTB中的发病率高于农村地区(8%对3%),在涂片阳性人群中的发病率高于涂片阴性人群(65%对2%)。CXR和CB-NAAT的主要障碍是无法在所有的显微镜中心提供这些检测,并且患者不愿意前往提供CXR和CB-NAAT服务的设施。结论:PPTB的CXR和CB-NAAT不理想。RNTCP应采取措施,在实施其最新诊断算法时解决这些差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chest Radiography and Xpert MTB/RIF® Testing in Persons with Presumptive Pulmonary TB: Gaps and Challenges from a District in Karnataka, India.

Background: In India, as per the latest diagnostic algorithm, all persons with presumptive pulmonary TB (PPTB) are required to undergo sputum smear examination and chest radiography (CXR) upfront. Those with sputum smear positive, sputum smear negative, but CXR lesions suggestive of TB or those with strong clinical suspicion of TB are expected to undergo Xpert MTB/RIF® assay test (also known as CB-NAAT (cartridge-based nucleic acid amplification test)).

Objective: To assess what proportion of PPTB who are undergoing sputum smear examination at microscopy centers of public health facilities have undergone CXR and CB-NAAT. To explore the barriers for uptake of CXR and CB-NAAT from the public health care provider's perspective.

Methods: We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study in Chikkaballapur district of Karnataka State, South India. The quantitative component involved a review of records of PPTB who had undergone sputum smear examination in a representative sample of seven microscopy centers. The qualitative component involved key informant interviews with four medical officers and group interviews with 9 paramedical staff.

Results: In February and March 2019, about 732 PPTB had undergone smear examination. Of these, 301 (41%) had undergone CXR and 49 (7%) had undergone CB-NAAT. The proportion of PPTB who had undergone CXR varied across the seven microscopy centers (0% to 89%). CB-NAAT was higher in PPTB from urban areas when compared to rural areas (8% vs. 3%) and in those who were smear positive when compared to smear negative (65% vs. 2%). The major barriers for CXR and CB-NAAT were nonavailability of these tests at all microscopy centers and patients' reluctance to travel to the facilities where CXR and CB-NAAT services are available.

Conclusions: CXR and CB-NAAT of PPTB are suboptimal. RNTCP should undertake measures to address these gaps in implementing its latest diagnostic algorithm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
End Tuberculosis: Challenges and Opportunities. Impact of Isoniazid Preventive Therapy on Tuberculosis Incidence and Predictors of Tuberculosis Among People Living With HIV/AIDS at Debre Tabor General Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. The Burden of Bacteriologically Negative TB Diagnosis: A Four-Year Review of Tuberculosis Cases at a Tertiary Facility. Assessment of Smear-Positive Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Associated Factors among Patients Visiting Health Facilities of Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Drug Resistance in Tuberculous Lymphadenitis: Molecular Characterization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1