基于四分量多重调度的条件强制评估。

IF 0.7 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Analysis of Verbal Behavior Pub Date : 2018-10-15 eCollection Date: 2019-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s40616-018-0099-9
Jessica S Akers, Billie J Retzlaff, Wayne W Fisher, Brian D Greer, Ami J Kaminski, Andresa A DeSouza
{"title":"基于四分量多重调度的条件强制评估。","authors":"Jessica S Akers,&nbsp;Billie J Retzlaff,&nbsp;Wayne W Fisher,&nbsp;Brian D Greer,&nbsp;Ami J Kaminski,&nbsp;Andresa A DeSouza","doi":"10.1007/s40616-018-0099-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most verbal behavior curricula for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) focus on teaching multiple mands during the early stages of training (e.g., picture exchange communication system; Bondy & Frost, 1994). However, few, if any, of those curricula train children with ASD to differentially mand only for reinforcers that are reasonable for a caregiver to deliver in a given context (e.g., mands to cuddle at bedtime) and to refrain from manding for reinforcers that would be inappropriate to deliver in that context (e.g., mands to play outside at bedtime). In this study, we first taught a boy with ASD two initial mands. Immediately thereafter we brought those mands under the conditional discriminative control of a four-component multiple schedule with (a) S<sup>1</sup> correlated with one reinforcer available (i.e., edibles), (b) S<sup>2</sup> correlated with both reinforcers available (i.e., edibles or drink), (c) S<sup>3</sup> correlated with another reinforcer available (i.e., drink), and (d) S<sup>Δ</sup> correlated with no reinforcer available. Following treatment, the child displayed conditionally discriminated manding in accordance with each of the four components of the schedule. We discuss these findings relative to the potential benefits of bringing mands under both evocative and discriminative control.</p>","PeriodicalId":51684,"journal":{"name":"Analysis of Verbal Behavior","volume":"35 1","pages":"94-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40616-018-0099-9","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Conditional Manding Using a Four-Component Multiple Schedule.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica S Akers,&nbsp;Billie J Retzlaff,&nbsp;Wayne W Fisher,&nbsp;Brian D Greer,&nbsp;Ami J Kaminski,&nbsp;Andresa A DeSouza\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40616-018-0099-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Most verbal behavior curricula for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) focus on teaching multiple mands during the early stages of training (e.g., picture exchange communication system; Bondy & Frost, 1994). However, few, if any, of those curricula train children with ASD to differentially mand only for reinforcers that are reasonable for a caregiver to deliver in a given context (e.g., mands to cuddle at bedtime) and to refrain from manding for reinforcers that would be inappropriate to deliver in that context (e.g., mands to play outside at bedtime). In this study, we first taught a boy with ASD two initial mands. Immediately thereafter we brought those mands under the conditional discriminative control of a four-component multiple schedule with (a) S<sup>1</sup> correlated with one reinforcer available (i.e., edibles), (b) S<sup>2</sup> correlated with both reinforcers available (i.e., edibles or drink), (c) S<sup>3</sup> correlated with another reinforcer available (i.e., drink), and (d) S<sup>Δ</sup> correlated with no reinforcer available. Following treatment, the child displayed conditionally discriminated manding in accordance with each of the four components of the schedule. We discuss these findings relative to the potential benefits of bringing mands under both evocative and discriminative control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analysis of Verbal Behavior\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"94-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40616-018-0099-9\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analysis of Verbal Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0099-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis of Verbal Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0099-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

大多数针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的语言行为课程在训练的早期阶段侧重于多手势的教学(例如,图片交换沟通系统;邦迪和弗罗斯特,1994)。然而,这些课程中很少(如果有的话)训练自闭症儿童区别地只要求照顾者在给定环境中提供合理的强化物(例如,睡前拥抱的命令),而不要求在该环境中不合适的强化物(例如,睡前在外面玩耍的命令)。在这项研究中,我们首先教了一个自闭症男孩两种初始指令。随后,我们将这些手部置于四组分多重计划的条件判别控制下,其中(a) S1与一种可用的强化物(即可食用的食物)相关,(b) S2与两种可用的强化物(即可食用的食物或饮料)相关,(c) S3与另一种可用的强化物(即饮料)相关,(d) SΔ与没有可用的强化物相关。在治疗后,儿童根据时间表的四个组成部分中的每一个表现出有条件歧视的要求。我们讨论了这些发现与将手置于唤起性和歧视性控制之下的潜在好处有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Evaluation of Conditional Manding Using a Four-Component Multiple Schedule.

Most verbal behavior curricula for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) focus on teaching multiple mands during the early stages of training (e.g., picture exchange communication system; Bondy & Frost, 1994). However, few, if any, of those curricula train children with ASD to differentially mand only for reinforcers that are reasonable for a caregiver to deliver in a given context (e.g., mands to cuddle at bedtime) and to refrain from manding for reinforcers that would be inappropriate to deliver in that context (e.g., mands to play outside at bedtime). In this study, we first taught a boy with ASD two initial mands. Immediately thereafter we brought those mands under the conditional discriminative control of a four-component multiple schedule with (a) S1 correlated with one reinforcer available (i.e., edibles), (b) S2 correlated with both reinforcers available (i.e., edibles or drink), (c) S3 correlated with another reinforcer available (i.e., drink), and (d) SΔ correlated with no reinforcer available. Following treatment, the child displayed conditionally discriminated manding in accordance with each of the four components of the schedule. We discuss these findings relative to the potential benefits of bringing mands under both evocative and discriminative control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analysis of Verbal Behavior
Analysis of Verbal Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Analysis of Verbal Behavior (TAVB) is an official publication of the Association for Behavior Analysis International.  The Mission of the journal is to support the dissemination of innovative empirical research, theoretical conceptualizations, and real-world applications of the behavioral science of language. The journal embraces diverse perspectives of human language, its conceptual underpinnings, and the utility such diversity affords. TAVB values contributions that represent the scope of field and breadth of populations behavior analysts serve, and Is the premier publication outlet that fosters increased dialogue between scientists and scientist-practitioners.  Articles addressing the following topics are encouraged: language acquisition, verbal operants, relational frames, naming, rule-governed behavior, epistemology, language assessment and training, bilingualism, verbal behavior of nonhumans, research methodology, or any other topic that addresses the analysis of language from a behavior analytic perspective.
期刊最新文献
The Use of Multiple Exemplar Instruction to Induce Emergent Listener Discriminations and Emergent Intraverbal Vocal Responses in Autistic Children. Teaching an Infant to Request Help. Procedural Fidelity Reporting in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior from 2007-2021. Teaching Problem Explanations Using Instructive Feedback: A Replication and Extension A Treatment Evaluation of Successive and Simultaneous Visual Stimulus Presentation During Tact Training with Children with Autism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1