对布来哌唑治疗急性精神分裂症的一项为期 6 周的随机、安慰剂对照、活性参考研究进行事后分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Acta Neuropsychiatrica Pub Date : 2020-02-14 DOI:10.1017/neu.2020.8
Stephen R Marder, Hans Eriksson, Yudong Zhao, Mary Hobart
{"title":"对布来哌唑治疗急性精神分裂症的一项为期 6 周的随机、安慰剂对照、活性参考研究进行事后分析。","authors":"Stephen R Marder, Hans Eriksson, Yudong Zhao, Mary Hobart","doi":"10.1017/neu.2020.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We provide a closer look at the result of a randomised, placebo-controlled, active-reference (quetiapine XR), flexible-dose, 6-week study of brexpiprazole in schizophrenia, which did not meet its primary endpoint - change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. We also investigate potential expectancy bias from the well-known side-effect profile of the active reference that could have affected the study outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre-specified sensitivity analyses of the primary end point were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) last observation carried forward (LOCF) and observed cases (OC). Post hoc analyses of change from baseline in PANSS total score were performed using the mixed model for repeated measures approach with treatment groups split by having typical adverse events with potential for functional unblinding, for example, somnolence, increase in weight, dizziness, dry mouth and sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-specified sensitivity analyses showed separation from placebo for brexpiprazole at week 6: LOCF, ANCOVA: -4.3 [95% CI (-8.0, -0.5), p = 0.0254]. OC, ANCOVA: -3.9 [95% CI (-7.3, -0.5), p = 0.0260]. Patients treated with brexpiprazole experiencing typical adverse events with potential for functional unblinding before or at Week 2 had a least square (LS) mean PANSS change of -29.5 (improvement), with a difference in change from baseline to Week 6 in PANSS total score between brexpiprazole and placebo of -13.5 [95% CI (-23.1, -4.0), p = 0.0057], and those who did not had an LS mean change of -18.9 and a difference between brexpiprazole and placebo of -2.9 [95% CI (-7.2, 1.4), p = 0.1809].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-specified sensitivity analyses showed separation from placebo for brexpiprazole at Week 6. A post hoc analysis suggested a potential confounding of efficacy rating towards symptom improvement in patients who experience known side effects of quetiapine XR.</p>","PeriodicalId":48964,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Post hoc</i> analysis of a randomised, placebo-controlled, active-reference 6-week study of brexpiprazole in acute schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen R Marder, Hans Eriksson, Yudong Zhao, Mary Hobart\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/neu.2020.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We provide a closer look at the result of a randomised, placebo-controlled, active-reference (quetiapine XR), flexible-dose, 6-week study of brexpiprazole in schizophrenia, which did not meet its primary endpoint - change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. We also investigate potential expectancy bias from the well-known side-effect profile of the active reference that could have affected the study outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pre-specified sensitivity analyses of the primary end point were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) last observation carried forward (LOCF) and observed cases (OC). Post hoc analyses of change from baseline in PANSS total score were performed using the mixed model for repeated measures approach with treatment groups split by having typical adverse events with potential for functional unblinding, for example, somnolence, increase in weight, dizziness, dry mouth and sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-specified sensitivity analyses showed separation from placebo for brexpiprazole at week 6: LOCF, ANCOVA: -4.3 [95% CI (-8.0, -0.5), p = 0.0254]. OC, ANCOVA: -3.9 [95% CI (-7.3, -0.5), p = 0.0260]. Patients treated with brexpiprazole experiencing typical adverse events with potential for functional unblinding before or at Week 2 had a least square (LS) mean PANSS change of -29.5 (improvement), with a difference in change from baseline to Week 6 in PANSS total score between brexpiprazole and placebo of -13.5 [95% CI (-23.1, -4.0), p = 0.0057], and those who did not had an LS mean change of -18.9 and a difference between brexpiprazole and placebo of -2.9 [95% CI (-7.2, 1.4), p = 0.1809].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pre-specified sensitivity analyses showed separation from placebo for brexpiprazole at Week 6. A post hoc analysis suggested a potential confounding of efficacy rating towards symptom improvement in patients who experience known side effects of quetiapine XR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neuropsychiatrica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neuropsychiatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2020.8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychiatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/neu.2020.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的我们对一项随机、安慰剂对照、活性参照物(喹硫平XR)、灵活剂量、为期6周的精神分裂症患者布来哌唑研究结果进行了深入探讨,该研究未达到主要终点--阳性与阴性综合征量表(PANSS)总分与基线相比的变化。我们还调查了众所周知的活性参比药物的副作用可能对研究结果产生影响的潜在预期偏差:使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)、最后观察结转分析(LOCF)和观察病例分析(OC)对主要终点进行了预先指定的敏感性分析。使用重复测量混合模型法对 PANSS 总分与基线相比的变化进行了事后分析,并根据可能出现功能性解盲的典型不良事件(如嗜睡、体重增加、头晕、口干和镇静)划分治疗组:预先指定的敏感性分析表明,在第 6 周时,布来哌唑与安慰剂的疗效有所区别:LOCF,方差分析:-4.3 [95% CI (-8.0, -0.5),p = 0.0254]。OC,方差分析:-3.9 [95% CI (-7.3, -0.5),p = 0.0260]。在第 2 周之前或第 2 周,接受布来哌唑治疗的患者出现了可能导致功能性解盲的典型不良事件,其 PANSS 平均值的最小平方(LS)变化为 -29.5(改善),布来哌唑与安慰剂的 PANSS 总分从基线到第 6 周的变化差异为 -13.5[95% CI (-7.3, -0.5),p = 0.0260]。5[95%CI(-23.1,-4.0),p=0.0057],而那些没有改善的患者的LS平均变化为-18.9,溴吡唑和安慰剂之间的差异为-2.9[95%CI(-7.2,1.4),p=0.1809]:预先指定的敏感性分析表明,在第6周时,布来哌唑与安慰剂的疗效有所区别。一项事后分析表明,在服用喹硫平XR后出现已知副作用的患者中,疗效评分可能会与症状改善情况相混淆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post hoc analysis of a randomised, placebo-controlled, active-reference 6-week study of brexpiprazole in acute schizophrenia.

Objective: We provide a closer look at the result of a randomised, placebo-controlled, active-reference (quetiapine XR), flexible-dose, 6-week study of brexpiprazole in schizophrenia, which did not meet its primary endpoint - change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. We also investigate potential expectancy bias from the well-known side-effect profile of the active reference that could have affected the study outcome.

Methods: Pre-specified sensitivity analyses of the primary end point were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) last observation carried forward (LOCF) and observed cases (OC). Post hoc analyses of change from baseline in PANSS total score were performed using the mixed model for repeated measures approach with treatment groups split by having typical adverse events with potential for functional unblinding, for example, somnolence, increase in weight, dizziness, dry mouth and sedation.

Results: Pre-specified sensitivity analyses showed separation from placebo for brexpiprazole at week 6: LOCF, ANCOVA: -4.3 [95% CI (-8.0, -0.5), p = 0.0254]. OC, ANCOVA: -3.9 [95% CI (-7.3, -0.5), p = 0.0260]. Patients treated with brexpiprazole experiencing typical adverse events with potential for functional unblinding before or at Week 2 had a least square (LS) mean PANSS change of -29.5 (improvement), with a difference in change from baseline to Week 6 in PANSS total score between brexpiprazole and placebo of -13.5 [95% CI (-23.1, -4.0), p = 0.0057], and those who did not had an LS mean change of -18.9 and a difference between brexpiprazole and placebo of -2.9 [95% CI (-7.2, 1.4), p = 0.1809].

Conclusion: Pre-specified sensitivity analyses showed separation from placebo for brexpiprazole at Week 6. A post hoc analysis suggested a potential confounding of efficacy rating towards symptom improvement in patients who experience known side effects of quetiapine XR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
Acta Neuropsychiatrica NEUROSCIENCES-PSYCHIATRY
自引率
5.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Acta Neuropsychiatrica is an international journal focussing on translational neuropsychiatry. It publishes high-quality original research papers and reviews. The Journal''s scope specifically highlights the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health that can be viewed broadly as the spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health.
期刊最新文献
The effect of azelaic acid on AlCl3-induced neurocognitive impairments and molecular changes in the hippocampus of rats. Uncovering Key Predictive Channels and Clinical Variables in the Gamma Band Auditory Steady-State Response in Early Stage Psychosis - a Longitudinal Study. The combination of a glucagon-like peptide-1 and amylin receptor agonists reduces alcohol consumption in both male and female rats. Exploring the intersection of metabolic and neuropsychiatric health. Significant haematological alterations in clozapine-treated patients: prevalence and clinical correlation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1