取下Essure®灭菌器前后非妇科症状评估:6个月随访研究

IF 1 Q2 Medicine Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.19.04391-0
Philippe Merviel, Dorothee Kurtz, Caroline Lelievre, Anne Le Gourrierec, Edith Postec-Ollitrault, Pierre-François Dupré
{"title":"取下Essure®灭菌器前后非妇科症状评估:6个月随访研究","authors":"Philippe Merviel,&nbsp;Dorothee Kurtz,&nbsp;Caroline Lelievre,&nbsp;Anne Le Gourrierec,&nbsp;Edith Postec-Ollitrault,&nbsp;Pierre-François Dupré","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.19.04391-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the clinical adverse events associated with the Essure® sterilization device have been attributed to incidents during and immediately after device placement (perforation, infection, expulsion). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence and severity of non-gynecological clinical symptoms (e.g. memory disorders, muscle pain, and impaired vision) in patients before device placement and after device removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women who presented at least four non-gynecological clinical symptoms with the Essure® filled out a questionnaire before surgical removal of the device and then 1, 3 and 6 months afterwards. Patients with bleeding (metrorrhagia and menorrhagia) or tube perforation were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two symptomatic women were included in the study and followed up for 6 months. The median (range) time interval between Essure® placement and the first clinical symptom was 13 months (1-60), and the median time interval between Essure® placement and removal was 38 months (12-72). The prevalence of clinical symptoms prior to device removal ranged from 26% (for urinary tract disorders) to 96% (for weakness). The mean±standard deviation intensity (on a 0-to-10 scale) of the symptoms before removal of the Essure® was 8.4±0.4; at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-removal, the values had fallen significantly to 4.2±0.6, 4±0.8, and 4.1±1, respectively (P<0.0001 for all the symptoms).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed decrease in symptom frequency and severity following Essure® removal and the persistence of this effect at 6 months suggest that the device should be removed in all symptomatic women.</p>","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"71 6","pages":"404-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of non-gynecological symptoms before and after removal of the Essure® sterilization device: a 6-month follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"Philippe Merviel,&nbsp;Dorothee Kurtz,&nbsp;Caroline Lelievre,&nbsp;Anne Le Gourrierec,&nbsp;Edith Postec-Ollitrault,&nbsp;Pierre-François Dupré\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4784.19.04391-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the clinical adverse events associated with the Essure® sterilization device have been attributed to incidents during and immediately after device placement (perforation, infection, expulsion). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence and severity of non-gynecological clinical symptoms (e.g. memory disorders, muscle pain, and impaired vision) in patients before device placement and after device removal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women who presented at least four non-gynecological clinical symptoms with the Essure® filled out a questionnaire before surgical removal of the device and then 1, 3 and 6 months afterwards. Patients with bleeding (metrorrhagia and menorrhagia) or tube perforation were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two symptomatic women were included in the study and followed up for 6 months. The median (range) time interval between Essure® placement and the first clinical symptom was 13 months (1-60), and the median time interval between Essure® placement and removal was 38 months (12-72). The prevalence of clinical symptoms prior to device removal ranged from 26% (for urinary tract disorders) to 96% (for weakness). The mean±standard deviation intensity (on a 0-to-10 scale) of the symptoms before removal of the Essure® was 8.4±0.4; at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-removal, the values had fallen significantly to 4.2±0.6, 4±0.8, and 4.1±1, respectively (P<0.0001 for all the symptoms).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The observed decrease in symptom frequency and severity following Essure® removal and the persistence of this effect at 6 months suggest that the device should be removed in all symptomatic women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva ginecologica\",\"volume\":\"71 6\",\"pages\":\"404-411\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva ginecologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.19.04391-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.19.04391-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:大多数与Essure®灭菌装置相关的临床不良事件都是由于装置放置期间和之后发生的事件(穿孔、感染、排出)。本研究的目的是前瞻性评估患者在植入设备前和移除设备后非妇科临床症状(如记忆障碍、肌肉疼痛和视力受损)的患病率和严重程度。方法:使用Essure®出现至少四种非妇科临床症状的妇女在手术取出设备前填写问卷,然后在手术取出设备1、3和6个月后填写问卷。排除出血(子宫出血和月经过多)或输卵管穿孔的患者。结果:52例有症状的女性纳入研究,随访6个月。Essure®放置和首次临床症状之间的中位时间间隔(范围)为13个月(1-60),Essure®放置和移除之间的中位时间间隔为38个月(12-72)。移除装置前临床症状的患病率从26%(尿路疾病)到96%(虚弱)不等。取下Essure®前症状的平均±标准差强度(按0- 10分制)为8.4±0.4;在取出后1个月、3个月和6个月,该数值分别显著下降到4.2±0.6、4±0.8和4.1±1。(结论:观察到在取出Essure®后症状频率和严重程度的下降,并且这种效果在6个月时持续存在,表明所有有症状的女性都应该取出该装置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of non-gynecological symptoms before and after removal of the Essure® sterilization device: a 6-month follow-up study.

Background: Most of the clinical adverse events associated with the Essure® sterilization device have been attributed to incidents during and immediately after device placement (perforation, infection, expulsion). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence and severity of non-gynecological clinical symptoms (e.g. memory disorders, muscle pain, and impaired vision) in patients before device placement and after device removal.

Methods: Women who presented at least four non-gynecological clinical symptoms with the Essure® filled out a questionnaire before surgical removal of the device and then 1, 3 and 6 months afterwards. Patients with bleeding (metrorrhagia and menorrhagia) or tube perforation were excluded.

Results: Fifty-two symptomatic women were included in the study and followed up for 6 months. The median (range) time interval between Essure® placement and the first clinical symptom was 13 months (1-60), and the median time interval between Essure® placement and removal was 38 months (12-72). The prevalence of clinical symptoms prior to device removal ranged from 26% (for urinary tract disorders) to 96% (for weakness). The mean±standard deviation intensity (on a 0-to-10 scale) of the symptoms before removal of the Essure® was 8.4±0.4; at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-removal, the values had fallen significantly to 4.2±0.6, 4±0.8, and 4.1±1, respectively (P<0.0001 for all the symptoms).

Conclusions: The observed decrease in symptom frequency and severity following Essure® removal and the persistence of this effect at 6 months suggest that the device should be removed in all symptomatic women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations. Re-birth in a Covid hospital: a point of view. Endometriosis-associated infertility: surgery or IVF? Cesarean delivery: an evidence-based review on of the technique. Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1