用点抽样法估计狒狒的每日行程距离——低估的幅度。

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Primate Biology Pub Date : 2017-07-10 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5194/pb-4-143-2017
Holger Sennhenn-Reulen, Langhalima Diedhiou, Matthias Klapproth, Dietmar Zinner
{"title":"用点抽样法估计狒狒的每日行程距离——低估的幅度。","authors":"Holger Sennhenn-Reulen,&nbsp;Langhalima Diedhiou,&nbsp;Matthias Klapproth,&nbsp;Dietmar Zinner","doi":"10.5194/pb-4-143-2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Daily travel distance (DTD), the distance an animal moves over the course of the day, is an important metric in movement ecology. It provides data with which to test hypotheses related to energetics and behaviour, e.g. impact of group size or food distribution on DTDs. The automated tracking of movements by applying GPS technology has become widely available and easy to implement. However, due to battery duration constraints, it is necessary to select a tracking-time resolution, which inevitably introduces an underestimation of the true underlying path distance. Here we give a quantification of this inherent systematic underestimation of DTDs for a terrestrial primate, the Guinea baboon. We show that sampling protocols with interval lengths from 1 to 120 min underestimate DTDs on average by 7 to 35 %. For longer time intervals (i.e. 60, 90, 120 min), the relative increase of deviation from the \"true\" trajectory is less pronounced than for shorter intervals. Our study provides first hints on the magnitude of error, which can be applied as a corrective when estimating absolute DTDs in calculations on travelling costs in terrestrial primates.</p>","PeriodicalId":37245,"journal":{"name":"Primate Biology","volume":"4 2","pages":"143-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041532/pdf/","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of baboon daily travel distances by means of point sampling - the magnitude of underestimation.\",\"authors\":\"Holger Sennhenn-Reulen,&nbsp;Langhalima Diedhiou,&nbsp;Matthias Klapproth,&nbsp;Dietmar Zinner\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/pb-4-143-2017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Daily travel distance (DTD), the distance an animal moves over the course of the day, is an important metric in movement ecology. It provides data with which to test hypotheses related to energetics and behaviour, e.g. impact of group size or food distribution on DTDs. The automated tracking of movements by applying GPS technology has become widely available and easy to implement. However, due to battery duration constraints, it is necessary to select a tracking-time resolution, which inevitably introduces an underestimation of the true underlying path distance. Here we give a quantification of this inherent systematic underestimation of DTDs for a terrestrial primate, the Guinea baboon. We show that sampling protocols with interval lengths from 1 to 120 min underestimate DTDs on average by 7 to 35 %. For longer time intervals (i.e. 60, 90, 120 min), the relative increase of deviation from the \\\"true\\\" trajectory is less pronounced than for shorter intervals. Our study provides first hints on the magnitude of error, which can be applied as a corrective when estimating absolute DTDs in calculations on travelling costs in terrestrial primates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primate Biology\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"143-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primate Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/pb-4-143-2017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primate Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/pb-4-143-2017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

日移动距离(DTD)是动物在一天中移动的距离,是运动生态学中的一个重要度量。它为测试与能量学和行为有关的假设提供了数据,例如群体规模或食物分布对dtd的影响。利用GPS技术对运动进行自动跟踪已成为一种广泛可行且易于实现的技术。然而,由于电池持续时间的限制,有必要选择跟踪时间分辨率,这不可避免地会导致对真实底层路径距离的低估。在这里,我们给出了一个量化的固有系统低估的dtd为陆地灵长类动物,几内亚狒狒。我们表明,间隔长度为1到120 min的采样协议平均低估了7到35 %的dtd。对于较长的时间间隔(即60,90,120 min),相对于较短的时间间隔,偏离“真实”轨迹的相对增加不那么明显。我们的研究提供了误差大小的初步提示,这可以作为估计陆地灵长类动物旅行成本计算中绝对dtd的校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of baboon daily travel distances by means of point sampling - the magnitude of underestimation.

Daily travel distance (DTD), the distance an animal moves over the course of the day, is an important metric in movement ecology. It provides data with which to test hypotheses related to energetics and behaviour, e.g. impact of group size or food distribution on DTDs. The automated tracking of movements by applying GPS technology has become widely available and easy to implement. However, due to battery duration constraints, it is necessary to select a tracking-time resolution, which inevitably introduces an underestimation of the true underlying path distance. Here we give a quantification of this inherent systematic underestimation of DTDs for a terrestrial primate, the Guinea baboon. We show that sampling protocols with interval lengths from 1 to 120 min underestimate DTDs on average by 7 to 35 %. For longer time intervals (i.e. 60, 90, 120 min), the relative increase of deviation from the "true" trajectory is less pronounced than for shorter intervals. Our study provides first hints on the magnitude of error, which can be applied as a corrective when estimating absolute DTDs in calculations on travelling costs in terrestrial primates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primate Biology
Primate Biology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of reward value on the performance of long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in a delay-of-gratification exchange task Male-biased dominance in greater bamboo lemurs (Prolemur simus) A dataset of new occurrence records of primates from the arc of deforestation, Brazil. Djaffa Mountains guereza (Colobus guereza gallarum) abundance in forests of the Ahmar Mountains, Ethiopia Notes on the distribution and habitat use of marmosets (Callitrichidae: Mico) from south-central Amazonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1