狨猴玻璃体内注射的可行性及眼科安全性评估。

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Primate Biology Pub Date : 2017-04-28 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5194/pb-4-93-2017
Birgit Korbmacher, Jenny Atorf, Stephanie Fridrichs-Gromoll, Marilyn Hill, Sven Korte, Jan Kremers, Keith Mansfield, Lars Mecklenburg, Andrew Pilling, Andreas Wiederhold
{"title":"狨猴玻璃体内注射的可行性及眼科安全性评估。","authors":"Birgit Korbmacher,&nbsp;Jenny Atorf,&nbsp;Stephanie Fridrichs-Gromoll,&nbsp;Marilyn Hill,&nbsp;Sven Korte,&nbsp;Jan Kremers,&nbsp;Keith Mansfield,&nbsp;Lars Mecklenburg,&nbsp;Andrew Pilling,&nbsp;Andreas Wiederhold","doi":"10.5194/pb-4-93-2017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To safeguard patients, regulatory authorities require that new drugs that are to be given by the intravitreal (IVT) route are assessed for their safety in a laboratory species using the same route of administration. Due to the high similarity of ocular morphology and physiology between humans and nonhuman primates (NHPs) and due to the species specificity of many biotherapeutics, the monkey is often the only appropriate model. To this end, intravitreal administration and assessment of ocular toxicity are well established in cynomolgus monkeys (<i>Macaca fascicularis</i>). In contrast, the common marmoset monkey (<i>Callithrix jacchus</i>) is not a standard model for ocular toxicity studies due to its general sensitivity to laboratory investigations and small eye size. It was the purpose of the present work to study whether the marmoset is a useful alternative to the cynomolgus monkey for use in intravitreal toxicological studies. Six marmoset monkeys received repeated (every 2 weeks for a total of four doses) intravitreal injections of 10 or 20  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L of a placebo. The animals were assessed for measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP), standard ophthalmological investigations and electroretinography (ERG). At the end of the dosing period, the animals were sacrificed and the eyes were evaluated histologically. ERG revealed similar results when comparing predose to end-of-study data, and there was no difference between the two dose volumes. A transient increase in the IOP was seen immediately after dosing, which was more pronounced after dosing of 20  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L compared to 10  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L. Ophthalmologic and microscopic observations did not show any significant changes. Therefore, it can be concluded that 10  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L as well as 20  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L intravitreal injections of a placebo are well tolerated in the marmoset. These results demonstrate that the common marmoset is an alternative to the cynomolgus monkey for intravitreal toxicity testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":37245,"journal":{"name":"Primate Biology","volume":"4 1","pages":"93-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041524/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of intravitreal injections and ophthalmic safety assessment in marmoset (<i>Callithrix jacchus</i>) monkeys.\",\"authors\":\"Birgit Korbmacher,&nbsp;Jenny Atorf,&nbsp;Stephanie Fridrichs-Gromoll,&nbsp;Marilyn Hill,&nbsp;Sven Korte,&nbsp;Jan Kremers,&nbsp;Keith Mansfield,&nbsp;Lars Mecklenburg,&nbsp;Andrew Pilling,&nbsp;Andreas Wiederhold\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/pb-4-93-2017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To safeguard patients, regulatory authorities require that new drugs that are to be given by the intravitreal (IVT) route are assessed for their safety in a laboratory species using the same route of administration. Due to the high similarity of ocular morphology and physiology between humans and nonhuman primates (NHPs) and due to the species specificity of many biotherapeutics, the monkey is often the only appropriate model. To this end, intravitreal administration and assessment of ocular toxicity are well established in cynomolgus monkeys (<i>Macaca fascicularis</i>). In contrast, the common marmoset monkey (<i>Callithrix jacchus</i>) is not a standard model for ocular toxicity studies due to its general sensitivity to laboratory investigations and small eye size. It was the purpose of the present work to study whether the marmoset is a useful alternative to the cynomolgus monkey for use in intravitreal toxicological studies. Six marmoset monkeys received repeated (every 2 weeks for a total of four doses) intravitreal injections of 10 or 20  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L of a placebo. The animals were assessed for measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP), standard ophthalmological investigations and electroretinography (ERG). At the end of the dosing period, the animals were sacrificed and the eyes were evaluated histologically. ERG revealed similar results when comparing predose to end-of-study data, and there was no difference between the two dose volumes. A transient increase in the IOP was seen immediately after dosing, which was more pronounced after dosing of 20  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L compared to 10  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L. Ophthalmologic and microscopic observations did not show any significant changes. Therefore, it can be concluded that 10  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L as well as 20  <math><mrow><mi>µ</mi></mrow> </math> L intravitreal injections of a placebo are well tolerated in the marmoset. These results demonstrate that the common marmoset is an alternative to the cynomolgus monkey for intravitreal toxicity testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primate Biology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"93-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7041524/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primate Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/pb-4-93-2017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primate Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/pb-4-93-2017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了保护患者,监管当局要求通过玻璃体内(IVT)途径给药的新药在实验室物种中使用相同的给药途径评估其安全性。由于人类和非人灵长类动物(NHPs)的眼部形态和生理高度相似,以及许多生物治疗药物的物种特异性,猴子通常是唯一合适的模型。为此,在食蟹猴(Macaca fascularis)中,玻璃体内给药和眼部毒性评估已经建立。相比之下,普通狨猴(Callithrix jacchus)不是眼毒性研究的标准模型,因为它对实验室检查普遍敏感,而且眼睛很小。本研究的目的是研究狨猴是否可以替代食蟹猴用于玻璃体内毒理学研究。6只狨猴接受了玻璃体内10或20 µL安慰剂的重复注射(每2周共4次)。评估动物的眼压(IOP)测量,标准眼科检查和视网膜电图(ERG)。在给药期结束时,处死动物,对眼睛进行组织学评价。在比较给药前和研究结束时的数据时,ERG显示了相似的结果,两种剂量之间没有差异。在给药后立即观察到IOP的短暂增加,与10 µL相比,在给药20 µL后更为明显,眼科和显微镜观察未显示任何显着变化。因此,可以得出结论,10 µL和20 µL的安慰剂玻璃体内注射在狨猴中是耐受良好的。这些结果表明,普通狨猴可以替代食蟹猴进行玻璃体内毒性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of intravitreal injections and ophthalmic safety assessment in marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) monkeys.

To safeguard patients, regulatory authorities require that new drugs that are to be given by the intravitreal (IVT) route are assessed for their safety in a laboratory species using the same route of administration. Due to the high similarity of ocular morphology and physiology between humans and nonhuman primates (NHPs) and due to the species specificity of many biotherapeutics, the monkey is often the only appropriate model. To this end, intravitreal administration and assessment of ocular toxicity are well established in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). In contrast, the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) is not a standard model for ocular toxicity studies due to its general sensitivity to laboratory investigations and small eye size. It was the purpose of the present work to study whether the marmoset is a useful alternative to the cynomolgus monkey for use in intravitreal toxicological studies. Six marmoset monkeys received repeated (every 2 weeks for a total of four doses) intravitreal injections of 10 or 20  µ L of a placebo. The animals were assessed for measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP), standard ophthalmological investigations and electroretinography (ERG). At the end of the dosing period, the animals were sacrificed and the eyes were evaluated histologically. ERG revealed similar results when comparing predose to end-of-study data, and there was no difference between the two dose volumes. A transient increase in the IOP was seen immediately after dosing, which was more pronounced after dosing of 20  µ L compared to 10  µ L. Ophthalmologic and microscopic observations did not show any significant changes. Therefore, it can be concluded that 10  µ L as well as 20  µ L intravitreal injections of a placebo are well tolerated in the marmoset. These results demonstrate that the common marmoset is an alternative to the cynomolgus monkey for intravitreal toxicity testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Primate Biology
Primate Biology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effect of reward value on the performance of long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in a delay-of-gratification exchange task Male-biased dominance in greater bamboo lemurs (Prolemur simus) A dataset of new occurrence records of primates from the arc of deforestation, Brazil. Djaffa Mountains guereza (Colobus guereza gallarum) abundance in forests of the Ahmar Mountains, Ethiopia Notes on the distribution and habitat use of marmosets (Callitrichidae: Mico) from south-central Amazonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1