{"title":"一项前瞻性临床内镜随访研究在年轻患者消化性溃疡穿孔在印度中部的一个高等研究所。","authors":"Deepa Jahagirdaar, Nitin Bomanwar, Sneha Joshi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perforation peritonitis is one of the commonest encountered emergencies in the surgery casualty. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying risk factors in peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in young patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy patients were evaluated in this study and were followed up with clinical examination and endoscopy at 8 weeks and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 70 patients, there was a mortality of 5 patients and 7 patients were lost to follow-up. Out of the remaining 57 patients, 56 were men and 1 was a woman. Maximum patients were from the age group of 35-40 years. The patients were categorized on the basis of their clinical symptoms and endoscopy results at the follow-up of 6 months in 4 categories-21 patients having an active ulcer and symptomatic, 15 patients having active ulcer but no symptoms, 16 patients who were asymptomatic and without an active ulcer and 5 patients nonulcer dyspepsia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative treatment with H<sub>2</sub> blockers or proton pump inhibiters along with anti-<i>Helicobacter pylori</i> regimen should be prescribed for all patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Routine endoscopic examination of such patients should also form a part of the follow-up to look for ulcer healing postoperatively.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Jahagirdaar D, Bomanwar N, Joshi S. A Prospective Clinicoendoscopic Follow-up Study in Young Patients with Peptic Ulcer Perforation at a Tertiary Institute in Central India. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2019;9(2):91-95.</p>","PeriodicalId":11992,"journal":{"name":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","volume":"9 2","pages":"91-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/e7/ejohg-9-91.PMC7047314.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Clinicoendoscopic Follow-up Study in Young Patients with Peptic Ulcer Perforation at a Tertiary Institute in Central India.\",\"authors\":\"Deepa Jahagirdaar, Nitin Bomanwar, Sneha Joshi\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perforation peritonitis is one of the commonest encountered emergencies in the surgery casualty. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying risk factors in peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in young patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy patients were evaluated in this study and were followed up with clinical examination and endoscopy at 8 weeks and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the total 70 patients, there was a mortality of 5 patients and 7 patients were lost to follow-up. Out of the remaining 57 patients, 56 were men and 1 was a woman. Maximum patients were from the age group of 35-40 years. The patients were categorized on the basis of their clinical symptoms and endoscopy results at the follow-up of 6 months in 4 categories-21 patients having an active ulcer and symptomatic, 15 patients having active ulcer but no symptoms, 16 patients who were asymptomatic and without an active ulcer and 5 patients nonulcer dyspepsia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative treatment with H<sub>2</sub> blockers or proton pump inhibiters along with anti-<i>Helicobacter pylori</i> regimen should be prescribed for all patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Routine endoscopic examination of such patients should also form a part of the follow-up to look for ulcer healing postoperatively.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Jahagirdaar D, Bomanwar N, Joshi S. A Prospective Clinicoendoscopic Follow-up Study in Young Patients with Peptic Ulcer Perforation at a Tertiary Institute in Central India. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2019;9(2):91-95.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"91-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/e7/ejohg-9-91.PMC7047314.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:穿孔性腹膜炎是外科伤员中最常见的急症之一。本研究旨在确定年轻患者消化性溃疡疾病(PUD)的危险因素。材料与方法:本研究对70例患者进行评估,分别于8周和6个月进行临床检查和内镜检查随访。结果:70例患者中,死亡5例,失访7例。在剩下的57名患者中,有56名男性和1名女性。最多患者年龄在35-40岁之间。根据患者的临床症状和随访6个月的内镜检查结果将患者分为4类:有活动性溃疡且有症状的患者21例,有活动性溃疡但无症状的患者15例,无症状且无活动性溃疡的患者16例,非溃疡性消化不良的患者5例。结论:所有消化性溃疡穿孔患者术后均应给予H2阻滞剂或质子泵抑制剂联合抗幽门螺杆菌方案治疗。这类患者的常规内镜检查也应成为随访的一部分,以寻找溃疡的术后愈合情况。Jahagirdaar D, Bomanwar N, Joshi S.在印度中部一所高等医学研究所对年轻消化性溃疡穿孔患者的前瞻性临床内镜随访研究。中华肝病杂志;2019;9(2):91-95。
A Prospective Clinicoendoscopic Follow-up Study in Young Patients with Peptic Ulcer Perforation at a Tertiary Institute in Central India.
Background: Perforation peritonitis is one of the commonest encountered emergencies in the surgery casualty. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying risk factors in peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in young patients.
Materials and methods: Seventy patients were evaluated in this study and were followed up with clinical examination and endoscopy at 8 weeks and 6 months.
Results: Out of the total 70 patients, there was a mortality of 5 patients and 7 patients were lost to follow-up. Out of the remaining 57 patients, 56 were men and 1 was a woman. Maximum patients were from the age group of 35-40 years. The patients were categorized on the basis of their clinical symptoms and endoscopy results at the follow-up of 6 months in 4 categories-21 patients having an active ulcer and symptomatic, 15 patients having active ulcer but no symptoms, 16 patients who were asymptomatic and without an active ulcer and 5 patients nonulcer dyspepsia.
Conclusion: Postoperative treatment with H2 blockers or proton pump inhibiters along with anti-Helicobacter pylori regimen should be prescribed for all patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Routine endoscopic examination of such patients should also form a part of the follow-up to look for ulcer healing postoperatively.
How to cite this article: Jahagirdaar D, Bomanwar N, Joshi S. A Prospective Clinicoendoscopic Follow-up Study in Young Patients with Peptic Ulcer Perforation at a Tertiary Institute in Central India. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2019;9(2):91-95.