子宫隔宫腔镜手术后的生殖结果:剪刀还是透热?

IF 1 Q2 Medicine Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2020-02-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04444-5
Angelos Daniilidis, Antonis Kalpatsanidis, Uzeyir Kalkan, Stamatis Kasmas, George Pados, Stefano Angioni
{"title":"子宫隔宫腔镜手术后的生殖结果:剪刀还是透热?","authors":"Angelos Daniilidis,&nbsp;Antonis Kalpatsanidis,&nbsp;Uzeyir Kalkan,&nbsp;Stamatis Kasmas,&nbsp;George Pados,&nbsp;Stefano Angioni","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04444-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hysteroscopic septoplasty is a safe and routinely used procedure for the treatment of septate uterus. The aim of this paper is to determine which hysteroscopic technique (scissors, monopolar/bipolar diathermy) is superior for post-treatment reproductive outcome.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Two different hysteroscopic septoplasty instruments (scissors and monopolar/bipolar diathermy) were compared, focusing on the pregnancy outcome. In addition, all published studies and reviews regarding pregnancy outcomes that occurred after operative hysteroscopy using different techniques (bipolar, monopolar electrodes, resectoscope, VERSAPOINT™ [Ethicon LLC] and scissors) were reviewed. Dichotomous analysis, with use of the Mantel-Haenszel method, was performed for all five outcomes, with fixed effect analysis model and odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure. Analysis details included totals and subtotals with 95% confidence interval. The Multinomial CI package for the R statistical language was also used.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Out of 26 full-text articles available in the literature, two studies were finally selected as eligible, with a total number of 125 patients. Pregnancy rate for scissors was 88.8% and for resectoscope was 75.6% (OR: 2.13, I2=29%; P=0.23). Delivery rate for scissors was 78.1% and for resectoscope was 75.0% (OR: 1.29, I2=0%; P=0.53). Miscarriage rate for scissors was 21.8% and for resectoscope was 27.1% (OR: 0.78, I2=0%; P=0.53). Preterm delivery rate for scissors was 6.2% and for resectoscope was 6.7% (OR: 0.85, I2=0%; P=0.94). Term delivery rate for scissors was 71.8% and for resectoscope was 66.1% (OR: 1.32, I2=0%; P=0.47). The lack of evidence in literature regarding the potential influence in the reproductive outcome of the instrument used when performing a hysteroscopy to treat a septate uterus became radically clear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in reproductive outcomes between women treated for septate uterus using resectoscope or scissors.</p>","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"72 1","pages":"36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproductive outcome after operative hysteroscopy for uterine septum: scissors or diathermy?\",\"authors\":\"Angelos Daniilidis,&nbsp;Antonis Kalpatsanidis,&nbsp;Uzeyir Kalkan,&nbsp;Stamatis Kasmas,&nbsp;George Pados,&nbsp;Stefano Angioni\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04444-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hysteroscopic septoplasty is a safe and routinely used procedure for the treatment of septate uterus. The aim of this paper is to determine which hysteroscopic technique (scissors, monopolar/bipolar diathermy) is superior for post-treatment reproductive outcome.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Two different hysteroscopic septoplasty instruments (scissors and monopolar/bipolar diathermy) were compared, focusing on the pregnancy outcome. In addition, all published studies and reviews regarding pregnancy outcomes that occurred after operative hysteroscopy using different techniques (bipolar, monopolar electrodes, resectoscope, VERSAPOINT™ [Ethicon LLC] and scissors) were reviewed. Dichotomous analysis, with use of the Mantel-Haenszel method, was performed for all five outcomes, with fixed effect analysis model and odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure. Analysis details included totals and subtotals with 95% confidence interval. The Multinomial CI package for the R statistical language was also used.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Out of 26 full-text articles available in the literature, two studies were finally selected as eligible, with a total number of 125 patients. Pregnancy rate for scissors was 88.8% and for resectoscope was 75.6% (OR: 2.13, I2=29%; P=0.23). Delivery rate for scissors was 78.1% and for resectoscope was 75.0% (OR: 1.29, I2=0%; P=0.53). Miscarriage rate for scissors was 21.8% and for resectoscope was 27.1% (OR: 0.78, I2=0%; P=0.53). Preterm delivery rate for scissors was 6.2% and for resectoscope was 6.7% (OR: 0.85, I2=0%; P=0.94). Term delivery rate for scissors was 71.8% and for resectoscope was 66.1% (OR: 1.32, I2=0%; P=0.47). The lack of evidence in literature regarding the potential influence in the reproductive outcome of the instrument used when performing a hysteroscopy to treat a septate uterus became radically clear.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in reproductive outcomes between women treated for septate uterus using resectoscope or scissors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva ginecologica\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"36-42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva ginecologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04444-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04444-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

宫腔镜下鼻中隔成形术是治疗隔子宫的一种安全且常规的方法。本文的目的是确定哪种宫腔镜技术(剪子、单极/双极透热)对治疗后的生殖结果更优越。证据获取:比较两种不同的宫腔镜鼻中隔成形术器械(剪刀和单极/双极透热),重点观察妊娠结局。此外,所有已发表的关于使用不同技术(双极、单极电极、切除镜、VERSAPOINT™[Ethicon LLC]和剪刀)的宫腔镜手术后妊娠结局的研究和综述都进行了回顾。采用Mantel-Haenszel法对5个结果进行二分类分析,采用固定效应分析模型和优势比(OR)作为效应度量。分析细节包括合计和小计,置信区间为95%。还使用了R统计语言的Multinomial CI包。证据综合:从文献中可获得的26篇全文文章中,最终选择了两项研究,共计125例患者。剪刀妊娠率为88.8%,切除镜妊娠率为75.6% (OR: 2.13, I2=29%;P = 0.23)。剪刀和切除镜的产出率分别为78.1%和75.0% (OR: 1.29, I2=0%;P = 0.53)。剪刀流产率为21.8%,切除镜流产率为27.1% (OR: 0.78, I2=0%;P = 0.53)。剪刀早产率为6.2%,切除镜早产率为6.7% (OR: 0.85, I2=0%;P = 0.94)。剪刀和切除镜的足月分娩率分别为71.8%和66.1% (OR: 1.32, I2=0%;P = 0.47)。在进行宫腔镜治疗分隔子宫时所使用的器械对生殖结果的潜在影响方面,文献中缺乏证据的情况变得非常明显。结论:采用切除镜和剪刀治疗子宫隔的妇女的生殖结局无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reproductive outcome after operative hysteroscopy for uterine septum: scissors or diathermy?

Introduction: Hysteroscopic septoplasty is a safe and routinely used procedure for the treatment of septate uterus. The aim of this paper is to determine which hysteroscopic technique (scissors, monopolar/bipolar diathermy) is superior for post-treatment reproductive outcome.

Evidence acquisition: Two different hysteroscopic septoplasty instruments (scissors and monopolar/bipolar diathermy) were compared, focusing on the pregnancy outcome. In addition, all published studies and reviews regarding pregnancy outcomes that occurred after operative hysteroscopy using different techniques (bipolar, monopolar electrodes, resectoscope, VERSAPOINT™ [Ethicon LLC] and scissors) were reviewed. Dichotomous analysis, with use of the Mantel-Haenszel method, was performed for all five outcomes, with fixed effect analysis model and odds ratio (OR) as the effect measure. Analysis details included totals and subtotals with 95% confidence interval. The Multinomial CI package for the R statistical language was also used.

Evidence synthesis: Out of 26 full-text articles available in the literature, two studies were finally selected as eligible, with a total number of 125 patients. Pregnancy rate for scissors was 88.8% and for resectoscope was 75.6% (OR: 2.13, I2=29%; P=0.23). Delivery rate for scissors was 78.1% and for resectoscope was 75.0% (OR: 1.29, I2=0%; P=0.53). Miscarriage rate for scissors was 21.8% and for resectoscope was 27.1% (OR: 0.78, I2=0%; P=0.53). Preterm delivery rate for scissors was 6.2% and for resectoscope was 6.7% (OR: 0.85, I2=0%; P=0.94). Term delivery rate for scissors was 71.8% and for resectoscope was 66.1% (OR: 1.32, I2=0%; P=0.47). The lack of evidence in literature regarding the potential influence in the reproductive outcome of the instrument used when performing a hysteroscopy to treat a septate uterus became radically clear.

Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were observed in reproductive outcomes between women treated for septate uterus using resectoscope or scissors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations. Re-birth in a Covid hospital: a point of view. Endometriosis-associated infertility: surgery or IVF? Cesarean delivery: an evidence-based review on of the technique. Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1