使用人体模型系统评估N95外科口罩的硬度:一项试点研究。

Samy Rengasamy, George Niezgoda
{"title":"使用人体模型系统评估N95外科口罩的硬度:一项试点研究。","authors":"Samy Rengasamy,&nbsp;George Niezgoda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical N95 respirators are devices certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and also cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a medical device. They are commonly used in healthcare settings to provide protection from infectious aerosols, as well as, bodily fluid sprays and splashes. It is hypothesized based on design, some models may change their shape significantly (i.e., collapse) during heavy breathing, which may allow the device to touch the wearer's face. Concerns have been raised that droplets of infectious biological fluids may reach the inner layer of surgical N95 respirators leading to the transfer of microorganisms to the oronasal facial region upon collapse. Unfortunately, little data currently exists on respirator rigidity testing or its relation to efficacy. The objective of this study was to develop and optimize a manikin-based test system to evaluate respirator rigidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six surgical N95 models of three different designs (cup-shaped, flat fold and trifold) were tested at two different environmental conditions on the NIOSH medium headform. Rigidity evaluation was performed at 50% relative humidity (RH) and 22°C, and at ~100% RH and 33°C at 40, 50, and 60 L/min breathing flow rates. Facial contact secondary to shape change was assessed by coating the inner layer of the surgical N95 respirators with a fluorescent tracer and its transfer to the manikin face.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the cup-shaped models were rigid and resistant to shape change at both environmental conditions and all flow rates. In contrast, the flat fold models and trifold models showed significant changes with rigidity, at higher breathing flow rates and higher RH and temperature conditions. The flat fold models showed transfer of the fluorescent tracer to the manikin face at higher RH and breathing rates, confirming a change in rigidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from the study suggest that the manikin-based test system designed for the purposes of this study can be used to evaluate respirator rigidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection","volume":"26 1","pages":"18-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111508/pdf/nihms-1048433.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Rigidity of Surgical N95 Respirators Using a Manikin-System: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Samy Rengasamy,&nbsp;George Niezgoda\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical N95 respirators are devices certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and also cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a medical device. They are commonly used in healthcare settings to provide protection from infectious aerosols, as well as, bodily fluid sprays and splashes. It is hypothesized based on design, some models may change their shape significantly (i.e., collapse) during heavy breathing, which may allow the device to touch the wearer's face. Concerns have been raised that droplets of infectious biological fluids may reach the inner layer of surgical N95 respirators leading to the transfer of microorganisms to the oronasal facial region upon collapse. Unfortunately, little data currently exists on respirator rigidity testing or its relation to efficacy. The objective of this study was to develop and optimize a manikin-based test system to evaluate respirator rigidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six surgical N95 models of three different designs (cup-shaped, flat fold and trifold) were tested at two different environmental conditions on the NIOSH medium headform. Rigidity evaluation was performed at 50% relative humidity (RH) and 22°C, and at ~100% RH and 33°C at 40, 50, and 60 L/min breathing flow rates. Facial contact secondary to shape change was assessed by coating the inner layer of the surgical N95 respirators with a fluorescent tracer and its transfer to the manikin face.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the cup-shaped models were rigid and resistant to shape change at both environmental conditions and all flow rates. In contrast, the flat fold models and trifold models showed significant changes with rigidity, at higher breathing flow rates and higher RH and temperature conditions. The flat fold models showed transfer of the fluorescent tracer to the manikin face at higher RH and breathing rates, confirming a change in rigidity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results from the study suggest that the manikin-based test system designed for the purposes of this study can be used to evaluate respirator rigidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"18-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7111508/pdf/nihms-1048433.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:外科N95呼吸器是经美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)认证的器械,也是美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的医疗器械。它们通常用于医疗保健环境,以提供对传染性气溶胶以及体液喷雾和飞溅的保护。根据设计假设,一些模型可能会在重度呼吸时显著改变其形状(即塌陷),这可能会使设备接触到佩戴者的脸。有人担心,感染性生物体液飞沫可能会进入医用N95口罩的内层,导致塌陷时微生物转移到口鼻面部区域。不幸的是,目前关于呼吸器硬度测试或其与功效的关系的数据很少。本研究的目的是开发和优化一个基于人体模型的测试系统来评估呼吸器的硬度。方法:采用三种不同设计(杯型、平折型和三折型)的6种外科N95模型,在两种不同环境条件下对NIOSH介质头部进行测试。在50%相对湿度(RH)和22°C、~100% RH和33°C、40、50和60 L/min呼吸流量下进行刚度评估。通过在医用N95口罩的内层涂上荧光示踪剂并将其转移到人体面部,评估了形状变化引起的面部接触。结果:结果表明,无论在何种环境条件下,还是在各种流量下,杯形模型都具有良好的刚性和抗形状变化能力。相比之下,在较高的呼吸流量和较高的相对湿度和温度条件下,平面褶皱模型和三重褶皱模型的刚度变化显著。平面折叠模型显示,在较高的相对湿度和呼吸速率下,荧光示踪剂转移到人体面部,证实了刚性的变化。结论:研究结果表明,为本研究目的而设计的基于人体模型的测试系统可用于评估呼吸器刚性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Rigidity of Surgical N95 Respirators Using a Manikin-System: A Pilot Study.

Background: Surgical N95 respirators are devices certified by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and also cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a medical device. They are commonly used in healthcare settings to provide protection from infectious aerosols, as well as, bodily fluid sprays and splashes. It is hypothesized based on design, some models may change their shape significantly (i.e., collapse) during heavy breathing, which may allow the device to touch the wearer's face. Concerns have been raised that droplets of infectious biological fluids may reach the inner layer of surgical N95 respirators leading to the transfer of microorganisms to the oronasal facial region upon collapse. Unfortunately, little data currently exists on respirator rigidity testing or its relation to efficacy. The objective of this study was to develop and optimize a manikin-based test system to evaluate respirator rigidity.

Methods: Six surgical N95 models of three different designs (cup-shaped, flat fold and trifold) were tested at two different environmental conditions on the NIOSH medium headform. Rigidity evaluation was performed at 50% relative humidity (RH) and 22°C, and at ~100% RH and 33°C at 40, 50, and 60 L/min breathing flow rates. Facial contact secondary to shape change was assessed by coating the inner layer of the surgical N95 respirators with a fluorescent tracer and its transfer to the manikin face.

Results: The results showed that the cup-shaped models were rigid and resistant to shape change at both environmental conditions and all flow rates. In contrast, the flat fold models and trifold models showed significant changes with rigidity, at higher breathing flow rates and higher RH and temperature conditions. The flat fold models showed transfer of the fluorescent tracer to the manikin face at higher RH and breathing rates, confirming a change in rigidity.

Conclusions: The results from the study suggest that the manikin-based test system designed for the purposes of this study can be used to evaluate respirator rigidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Next-Generation Custom-Fit Reusable Respiratory Protective Device with Continuous Fit Monitoring - Part II: Continuous Fit Monitoring. Modifying NIOSH's Manikin Fit Evaluation Method to Match Fit Testing with Human Subjects. Review of the Effect of Continuous Use and Limited Reuse of N95 Respirators on Respirator Fit. Elastomeric Half Mask Respirators: An Alternative to Disposable Respirators and a Solution to Shortages during Public Health Emergencies. Using Public Feedback about the use of Elastomeric Half Mask Respirators to Inform a National Deployment Study within Health Settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1