一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验证明了enextra®在健康成人中的安全性和有效性。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of the American College of Nutrition Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-15 DOI:10.1080/07315724.2020.1753129
Shalini Srivastava, Mark Mennemeier, Jayesh Anand Chaudhary
{"title":"一项随机安慰剂对照临床试验证明了enextra®在健康成人中的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Shalini Srivastava,&nbsp;Mark Mennemeier,&nbsp;Jayesh Anand Chaudhary","doi":"10.1080/07315724.2020.1753129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The present randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to assess the long-term safety and perceivable mental acuity benefits of EnXtra<sup>®</sup> in healthy individuals.<b>Methods:</b> Study participants were administered EnXtra<sup>®</sup> with or without caffeine for a period of 12 weeks. The cardiovascular safety was evaluated by assessing change in QT interval, blood pressure and heart rate. Further, other efficacy variables evaluated were change in perceived alertness and calmness by Bond and Lader mood scales, Sleep disturbance by Pittsburgh sleep quality Index and daytime sleepiness by Epworth sleepiness scale.<b>Results:</b> None of the study group showed any significant change in the ECG or haemodynamic parameters as compared to baseline (p > 0.05). Post consumption, alertness and calmness scores were significantly increased in the EnXtra<sup>®</sup>, and EnXtra<sup>®</sup> plus caffeine group (p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. Daytime sleep scores decreased in the EnXtra<sup>®</sup> group however change was not significant. Sleep quality remained undisturbed in all three arms.<b>Conclusion:</b> The findings demonstrated the psychostimulant efficacy of EnXtra<sup>®</sup> with no safety concerns on long-term usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":17193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Nutrition","volume":"40 3","pages":"224-236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07315724.2020.1753129","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial Demonstrating Safety & Efficacy of EnXtra<sup>®</sup> in Healthy Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Shalini Srivastava,&nbsp;Mark Mennemeier,&nbsp;Jayesh Anand Chaudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07315724.2020.1753129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The present randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to assess the long-term safety and perceivable mental acuity benefits of EnXtra<sup>®</sup> in healthy individuals.<b>Methods:</b> Study participants were administered EnXtra<sup>®</sup> with or without caffeine for a period of 12 weeks. The cardiovascular safety was evaluated by assessing change in QT interval, blood pressure and heart rate. Further, other efficacy variables evaluated were change in perceived alertness and calmness by Bond and Lader mood scales, Sleep disturbance by Pittsburgh sleep quality Index and daytime sleepiness by Epworth sleepiness scale.<b>Results:</b> None of the study group showed any significant change in the ECG or haemodynamic parameters as compared to baseline (p > 0.05). Post consumption, alertness and calmness scores were significantly increased in the EnXtra<sup>®</sup>, and EnXtra<sup>®</sup> plus caffeine group (p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. Daytime sleep scores decreased in the EnXtra<sup>®</sup> group however change was not significant. Sleep quality remained undisturbed in all three arms.<b>Conclusion:</b> The findings demonstrated the psychostimulant efficacy of EnXtra<sup>®</sup> with no safety concerns on long-term usage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"224-236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07315724.2020.1753129\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2020.1753129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2020.1753129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本随机、安慰剂对照研究旨在评估EnXtra®在健康个体中的长期安全性和可感知的精神敏锐度益处。方法:研究参与者分别服用EnXtra®(含或不含咖啡因)12周。通过观察QT间期、血压和心率的变化来评价心血管安全性。此外,其他疗效变量评估为Bond和Lader情绪量表感知警觉性和平静的变化,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评估睡眠障碍,Epworth嗜睡量表评估白天嗜睡。结果:与基线相比,研究组的心电图或血流动力学参数均无显著变化(p > 0.05)。与安慰剂组相比,EnXtra®和EnXtra®加咖啡因组的消费后,警觉性和冷静评分显着增加(p < 0.001)。EnXtra®组白天睡眠评分下降,但变化不显著。三组受试者的睡眠质量均未受影响。结论:研究结果证明了EnXtra®的精神兴奋作用,长期使用无安全性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial Demonstrating Safety & Efficacy of EnXtra® in Healthy Adults.

Objective: The present randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to assess the long-term safety and perceivable mental acuity benefits of EnXtra® in healthy individuals.Methods: Study participants were administered EnXtra® with or without caffeine for a period of 12 weeks. The cardiovascular safety was evaluated by assessing change in QT interval, blood pressure and heart rate. Further, other efficacy variables evaluated were change in perceived alertness and calmness by Bond and Lader mood scales, Sleep disturbance by Pittsburgh sleep quality Index and daytime sleepiness by Epworth sleepiness scale.Results: None of the study group showed any significant change in the ECG or haemodynamic parameters as compared to baseline (p > 0.05). Post consumption, alertness and calmness scores were significantly increased in the EnXtra®, and EnXtra® plus caffeine group (p < 0.001) as compared to placebo. Daytime sleep scores decreased in the EnXtra® group however change was not significant. Sleep quality remained undisturbed in all three arms.Conclusion: The findings demonstrated the psychostimulant efficacy of EnXtra® with no safety concerns on long-term usage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Nutrition accepts the following types of submissions: Original and innovative research in nutrition science with useful application for researchers, physicians, nutritionists, and other healthcare professionals with emphasis on discoveries which help to individualize or "personalize" nutrition science; Critical reviews on pertinent nutrition topics that highlight key teaching points and relevance to nutrition; Letters to the editors and commentaries on important issues in the field of nutrition; Abstract clusters on nutritional topics with editorial comments; Book reviews; Abstracts from the annual meeting of the American College of Nutrition in the October issue.
期刊最新文献
Association of Physical Activity and Dietary Diversity with Cognitive Function in the Elderly with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study Association of Vitamin E Intake with All-Cause Mortality Among Individuals with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cohort Study from the NHANES 1999-2018 Visual Analysis of Hot Topics and Trends in Nutrition for Decompensated Cirrhosis Between 1994 and 2024 Unveiling the Roles of Immune Function and Inflammation in the Associations Between Dietary Patterns and Incident Type 2 Diabetes Body Composition, Sarcopenic Obesity, and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2002 and 2011–2014
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1