在重症监护病房的时间限制试验,以促进目标一致的病人护理。

Todd D VanKerkhoff, Elizabeth M Viglianti, Michael E Detsky, Jacqueline M Kruser
{"title":"在重症监护病房的时间限制试验,以促进目标一致的病人护理。","authors":"Todd D VanKerkhoff,&nbsp;Elizabeth M Viglianti,&nbsp;Michael E Detsky,&nbsp;Jacqueline M Kruser","doi":"10.1097/cpm.0000000000000323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consider the hypothetical case of a 75-year-old patient admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to pneumonia and systolic heart failure. Although she suffers from a potentially treatable infection, her advanced age and chronic illness increase her risk of experiencing a poor outcome. Her family feels conflicted about whether the use of mechanical ventilation would be acceptable given what they understand about her values and preferences. In the ICU setting, clinicians, patients, and surrogate decision-makers frequently face challenges of prognostic uncertainty as well as uncertainty regarding patients' goals and values. Time-limited trials (TLTs) of life-sustaining treatments in the ICU have been proposed as one strategy to help facilitate goal-concordant care in the midst of a complex and high-stakes decision-making environment. TLTs represent an agreement between clinicians and patients or surrogate decision-makers to employ a therapy for an agreed-upon time period, with a plan for subsequent reassessment of the patient's progress according to previously-established criteria for improvement or decline. Herein, we review the concept of TLTs in intensive care, and explore their potential benefits, barriers, and challenges. Research demonstrates that, in practice, TLTs are conducted infrequently and often incompletely, and are challenged by system-level factors that diminish their effectiveness. The promise of TLTs in intensive care warrants continued research efforts, including implementation studies to improve adoption and fidelity, observational research to determine optimal timeframes for TLTs, and interventional trials to determine if TLTs ultimately improve the delivery of goal-concordant care in the ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":10393,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"26 5","pages":"141-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/cpm.0000000000000323","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-Limited Trials in the Intensive Care Unit to Promote Goal-Concordant Patient Care.\",\"authors\":\"Todd D VanKerkhoff,&nbsp;Elizabeth M Viglianti,&nbsp;Michael E Detsky,&nbsp;Jacqueline M Kruser\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/cpm.0000000000000323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Consider the hypothetical case of a 75-year-old patient admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to pneumonia and systolic heart failure. Although she suffers from a potentially treatable infection, her advanced age and chronic illness increase her risk of experiencing a poor outcome. Her family feels conflicted about whether the use of mechanical ventilation would be acceptable given what they understand about her values and preferences. In the ICU setting, clinicians, patients, and surrogate decision-makers frequently face challenges of prognostic uncertainty as well as uncertainty regarding patients' goals and values. Time-limited trials (TLTs) of life-sustaining treatments in the ICU have been proposed as one strategy to help facilitate goal-concordant care in the midst of a complex and high-stakes decision-making environment. TLTs represent an agreement between clinicians and patients or surrogate decision-makers to employ a therapy for an agreed-upon time period, with a plan for subsequent reassessment of the patient's progress according to previously-established criteria for improvement or decline. Herein, we review the concept of TLTs in intensive care, and explore their potential benefits, barriers, and challenges. Research demonstrates that, in practice, TLTs are conducted infrequently and often incompletely, and are challenged by system-level factors that diminish their effectiveness. The promise of TLTs in intensive care warrants continued research efforts, including implementation studies to improve adoption and fidelity, observational research to determine optimal timeframes for TLTs, and interventional trials to determine if TLTs ultimately improve the delivery of goal-concordant care in the ICU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 5\",\"pages\":\"141-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/cpm.0000000000000323\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/cpm.0000000000000323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/cpm.0000000000000323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

假设一个75岁的病人因肺炎和收缩期心力衰竭引起的急性缺氧呼吸衰竭而住进重症监护病房(ICU)。虽然她患有一种可以治疗的感染,但她的高龄和慢性疾病增加了她经历不良结果的风险。考虑到她的价值观和偏好,她的家人对是否可以接受使用机械通气感到矛盾。在ICU环境中,临床医生、患者和替代决策者经常面临预后不确定性以及患者目标和价值观不确定性的挑战。时间限制试验(tlt)在ICU的生命维持治疗已被提出作为一种策略,以帮助促进目标和谐护理在一个复杂的和高风险的决策环境中。tlt代表了临床医生和患者或替代决策者之间的协议,在商定的时间段内采用一种治疗方法,并制定了根据先前建立的改善或下降标准对患者进展进行后续重新评估的计划。在此,我们回顾了tlt在重症监护中的概念,并探讨了其潜在的好处、障碍和挑战。研究表明,在实践中,tlt很少进行,而且往往不完全,并且受到系统级因素的挑战,这些因素会降低其有效性。tlt在重症监护中的前景值得继续研究,包括实施研究以提高采用和保真度,观察研究以确定tlt的最佳时间框架,以及干预试验以确定tlt是否最终改善了ICU目标一致性护理的提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time-Limited Trials in the Intensive Care Unit to Promote Goal-Concordant Patient Care.

Consider the hypothetical case of a 75-year-old patient admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for acute hypoxic respiratory failure due to pneumonia and systolic heart failure. Although she suffers from a potentially treatable infection, her advanced age and chronic illness increase her risk of experiencing a poor outcome. Her family feels conflicted about whether the use of mechanical ventilation would be acceptable given what they understand about her values and preferences. In the ICU setting, clinicians, patients, and surrogate decision-makers frequently face challenges of prognostic uncertainty as well as uncertainty regarding patients' goals and values. Time-limited trials (TLTs) of life-sustaining treatments in the ICU have been proposed as one strategy to help facilitate goal-concordant care in the midst of a complex and high-stakes decision-making environment. TLTs represent an agreement between clinicians and patients or surrogate decision-makers to employ a therapy for an agreed-upon time period, with a plan for subsequent reassessment of the patient's progress according to previously-established criteria for improvement or decline. Herein, we review the concept of TLTs in intensive care, and explore their potential benefits, barriers, and challenges. Research demonstrates that, in practice, TLTs are conducted infrequently and often incompletely, and are challenged by system-level factors that diminish their effectiveness. The promise of TLTs in intensive care warrants continued research efforts, including implementation studies to improve adoption and fidelity, observational research to determine optimal timeframes for TLTs, and interventional trials to determine if TLTs ultimately improve the delivery of goal-concordant care in the ICU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Pulmonary Medicine provides a forum for the discussion of important new knowledge in the field of pulmonary medicine that is of interest and relevance to the practitioner. This goal is achieved through mini-reviews on focused sub-specialty topics in areas covered within the journal. These areas include: Obstructive Airways Disease; Respiratory Infections; Interstitial, Inflammatory, and Occupational Diseases; Clinical Practice Management; Critical Care/Respiratory Care; Colleagues in Respiratory Medicine; and Topics in Respiratory Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Systemic sclerosis associated myopathy: how to treat. Axillary lymphadenopathy in a high-risk breast screening patient following the COVID-19 vaccine: a diagnostic conundrum. Is a Trial of Observation Safer Than Intervention With Spontaneous Pneumothorax? The Complex Relationship Between Poor Sleep Quality and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and the Role of Lung Biopsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1