头先还是脖子先?串联大血管闭塞卒中取栓的再灌注速度和速率。

Q1 Medicine Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-02-15 DOI:10.1159/000496292
Diogo C Haussen, Francis Turjman, Michel Piotin, Julien Labreuche, Henrik Steglich-Arnholm, Markus Holtmannspötter, Christian Taschner, Sebastian Eiden, Raul G Nogueira, Panagiotis Papanagiotou, Maria Boutchakova, Adnan H Siddiqui, Bertrand Lapergue, Franziska Dorn, Christophe Cognard, Monika Killer, Salvatore Mangiafico, Marc Ribo, Marios N Psychogios, Alejandro M Spiotta, Marc-Antoine Labeyrie, Mikael Mazighi, Alessandra Biondi, Sébastien Richard, Jonathan A Grossberg, René Anxionnat, Serge Bracard, Benjamin Gory
{"title":"头先还是脖子先?串联大血管闭塞卒中取栓的再灌注速度和速率。","authors":"Diogo C Haussen,&nbsp;Francis Turjman,&nbsp;Michel Piotin,&nbsp;Julien Labreuche,&nbsp;Henrik Steglich-Arnholm,&nbsp;Markus Holtmannspötter,&nbsp;Christian Taschner,&nbsp;Sebastian Eiden,&nbsp;Raul G Nogueira,&nbsp;Panagiotis Papanagiotou,&nbsp;Maria Boutchakova,&nbsp;Adnan H Siddiqui,&nbsp;Bertrand Lapergue,&nbsp;Franziska Dorn,&nbsp;Christophe Cognard,&nbsp;Monika Killer,&nbsp;Salvatore Mangiafico,&nbsp;Marc Ribo,&nbsp;Marios N Psychogios,&nbsp;Alejandro M Spiotta,&nbsp;Marc-Antoine Labeyrie,&nbsp;Mikael Mazighi,&nbsp;Alessandra Biondi,&nbsp;Sébastien Richard,&nbsp;Jonathan A Grossberg,&nbsp;René Anxionnat,&nbsp;Serge Bracard,&nbsp;Benjamin Gory","doi":"10.1159/000496292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aim to evaluate the speed and rates of reperfusion in tandem large vessel occlusion acute stroke patients undergoing upfront cervical lesion treatment (Neck-First: angioplasty and/or stent before thrombectomy) as compared to direct intracranial occlusion therapy (Head-First) in a large international multicenter cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Thrombectomy In TANdem Lesions (TITAN) collaboration pooled individual data of prospectively collected thrombectomy international databases for all consecutive anterior circulation tandem patients who underwent emergent thrombectomy. The co-primary outcome measures were rates of successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3) and time from groin puncture to successful reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 289 patients with tandem atherosclerotic etiology were included in the analysis (182 Neck-First and 107 Head-First patients). Except for differences in the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS; median 8 [range 7-10] Neck-First vs. 7 [range 6-8] Head-First; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) lesion severity (complete occlusion in 35% of the Neck-First vs. 57% of the Head-First patients; <i>p</i> < 0.001), patient characteristics were well balanced. After adjustments, there was no difference in successful reperfusion rates between the study groups (odds ratio associated with Neck-First: 1.18 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.17]). The time to successful reperfusion from groin puncture was significantly shorter in the Head-First group after adjustments (median 56 min [range 39-90] vs. 70 [range 50-102]; <i>p</i> = 0.001). No significant differences in the rates of full reperfusion, symptomatic hemorrhage, 90-day independence, or mortality were observed. Sensitivity analysis excluding patients with complete cervical ICA occlusion yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The upfront approach of the intracranial lesion in patients with tandem large vessel occlusion strokes leads to similar reperfusion rates but faster reperfusion as compared to initial cervical revascularization followed by mechanical thrombectomy. Controlled studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000496292","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Head or Neck First? Speed and Rates of Reperfusion in Thrombectomy for Tandem Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes.\",\"authors\":\"Diogo C Haussen,&nbsp;Francis Turjman,&nbsp;Michel Piotin,&nbsp;Julien Labreuche,&nbsp;Henrik Steglich-Arnholm,&nbsp;Markus Holtmannspötter,&nbsp;Christian Taschner,&nbsp;Sebastian Eiden,&nbsp;Raul G Nogueira,&nbsp;Panagiotis Papanagiotou,&nbsp;Maria Boutchakova,&nbsp;Adnan H Siddiqui,&nbsp;Bertrand Lapergue,&nbsp;Franziska Dorn,&nbsp;Christophe Cognard,&nbsp;Monika Killer,&nbsp;Salvatore Mangiafico,&nbsp;Marc Ribo,&nbsp;Marios N Psychogios,&nbsp;Alejandro M Spiotta,&nbsp;Marc-Antoine Labeyrie,&nbsp;Mikael Mazighi,&nbsp;Alessandra Biondi,&nbsp;Sébastien Richard,&nbsp;Jonathan A Grossberg,&nbsp;René Anxionnat,&nbsp;Serge Bracard,&nbsp;Benjamin Gory\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000496292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aim to evaluate the speed and rates of reperfusion in tandem large vessel occlusion acute stroke patients undergoing upfront cervical lesion treatment (Neck-First: angioplasty and/or stent before thrombectomy) as compared to direct intracranial occlusion therapy (Head-First) in a large international multicenter cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Thrombectomy In TANdem Lesions (TITAN) collaboration pooled individual data of prospectively collected thrombectomy international databases for all consecutive anterior circulation tandem patients who underwent emergent thrombectomy. The co-primary outcome measures were rates of successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3) and time from groin puncture to successful reperfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 289 patients with tandem atherosclerotic etiology were included in the analysis (182 Neck-First and 107 Head-First patients). Except for differences in the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS; median 8 [range 7-10] Neck-First vs. 7 [range 6-8] Head-First; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) lesion severity (complete occlusion in 35% of the Neck-First vs. 57% of the Head-First patients; <i>p</i> < 0.001), patient characteristics were well balanced. After adjustments, there was no difference in successful reperfusion rates between the study groups (odds ratio associated with Neck-First: 1.18 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.17]). The time to successful reperfusion from groin puncture was significantly shorter in the Head-First group after adjustments (median 56 min [range 39-90] vs. 70 [range 50-102]; <i>p</i> = 0.001). No significant differences in the rates of full reperfusion, symptomatic hemorrhage, 90-day independence, or mortality were observed. Sensitivity analysis excluding patients with complete cervical ICA occlusion yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The upfront approach of the intracranial lesion in patients with tandem large vessel occlusion strokes leads to similar reperfusion rates but faster reperfusion as compared to initial cervical revascularization followed by mechanical thrombectomy. Controlled studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000496292\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000496292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/2/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000496292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

背景:我们的目的是在一项大型国际多中心队列研究中,评估接受颈部病变预先治疗(颈部优先:血管成形术和/或取栓前支架)的串联大血管闭塞急性脑卒中患者与直接颅内闭塞治疗(头部优先)相比的再灌注速度和速率。方法:TITAN合作项目汇集了前瞻性收集的所有连续前循环串联患者接受紧急取栓的取栓国际数据库的个人数据。共同的主要结局指标是再灌注成功率(脑梗死改良溶栓2b/3)和从腹股沟穿刺到成功再灌注的时间。结果:289例合并动脉粥样硬化病因的患者被纳入分析(182例颈部优先,107例头部优先)。除了阿尔伯塔中风项目早期CT评分的差异(ASPECTS;中位数8[范围7-10]颈优先vs. 7[范围6-8]头优先;p < 0.001)和颈内动脉(ICA)病变严重程度(35%的颈优先患者完全闭塞,57%的头优先患者完全闭塞;P < 0.001),患者特征平衡良好。调整后,两组再灌注成功率无差异(与Neck-First相关的优势比:1.18[95%可信区间,0.60-2.17])。调整后头先组从腹股沟穿刺到成功再灌注的时间明显更短(中位56分钟[范围39-90]vs. 70分钟[范围50-102];P = 0.001)。在完全再灌注率、症状性出血、90天独立性或死亡率方面没有观察到显著差异。排除宫颈ICA完全闭塞患者的敏感性分析结果相似。结论:在串联大血管闭塞性卒中患者中,颅内病变的正面入路与最初的颈椎血运重建术后机械取栓相比,可获得相似的再灌注率,但再灌注速度更快。有必要进行对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Head or Neck First? Speed and Rates of Reperfusion in Thrombectomy for Tandem Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes.

Background: We aim to evaluate the speed and rates of reperfusion in tandem large vessel occlusion acute stroke patients undergoing upfront cervical lesion treatment (Neck-First: angioplasty and/or stent before thrombectomy) as compared to direct intracranial occlusion therapy (Head-First) in a large international multicenter cohort.

Methods: The Thrombectomy In TANdem Lesions (TITAN) collaboration pooled individual data of prospectively collected thrombectomy international databases for all consecutive anterior circulation tandem patients who underwent emergent thrombectomy. The co-primary outcome measures were rates of successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3) and time from groin puncture to successful reperfusion.

Results: In total, 289 patients with tandem atherosclerotic etiology were included in the analysis (182 Neck-First and 107 Head-First patients). Except for differences in the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS; median 8 [range 7-10] Neck-First vs. 7 [range 6-8] Head-First; p < 0.001) and cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) lesion severity (complete occlusion in 35% of the Neck-First vs. 57% of the Head-First patients; p < 0.001), patient characteristics were well balanced. After adjustments, there was no difference in successful reperfusion rates between the study groups (odds ratio associated with Neck-First: 1.18 [95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.17]). The time to successful reperfusion from groin puncture was significantly shorter in the Head-First group after adjustments (median 56 min [range 39-90] vs. 70 [range 50-102]; p = 0.001). No significant differences in the rates of full reperfusion, symptomatic hemorrhage, 90-day independence, or mortality were observed. Sensitivity analysis excluding patients with complete cervical ICA occlusion yielded similar results.

Conclusions: The upfront approach of the intracranial lesion in patients with tandem large vessel occlusion strokes leads to similar reperfusion rates but faster reperfusion as compared to initial cervical revascularization followed by mechanical thrombectomy. Controlled studies are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recanalization of Tandem Vertebrobasilar Occlusions with Contralateral Vertebral Occlusion or Hypoplasia via either Direct Passage or the SHERPA Technique. Does the Addition of Non-Approved Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for rtPA Impact Treatment Rates? Findings in Australia, the UK, and the USA. In vitro Remote Aspiration Embolectomy for the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Isolated Cervical Carotid Occlusions: The Concept of "Hemodynamic Thrombectomy". An Appraisal of the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1