腹腔镜妇科手术伴或不伴粘连松解的女性手术粘连——患病率、严重程度和影响:一所大学医院的回顾性队列研究

IF 3.1 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Therapeutic advances in reproductive health Pub Date : 2020-05-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2633494120906010
Naser Al-Husban, Yousef Elayyan, Malab El-Qudah, Bayan Aloran, Rima Batayneh
{"title":"腹腔镜妇科手术伴或不伴粘连松解的女性手术粘连——患病率、严重程度和影响:一所大学医院的回顾性队列研究","authors":"Naser Al-Husban,&nbsp;Yousef Elayyan,&nbsp;Malab El-Qudah,&nbsp;Bayan Aloran,&nbsp;Rima Batayneh","doi":"10.1177/2633494120906010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To find out the prevalence of adhesions, severity, and their relation to the current clinical scenario and to the type of previous surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A retrospective study of patients who already had different previous abdominopelvic surgery and subsequently underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery for various indications. The patients' clinical and operative notes were reviewed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 654 procedures performed. The most common indication for the laparoscopic surgery was secondary infertility 23.5%, followed by adnexal lesions 22.0% and primary infertility 19.6%. Intraoperative adhesions were found in 45.3%. Adhesions were deemed relevant to the clinical scenario in 21.3%. Patients who had a previous history of open (traditional) surgery were more likely to be found with adhesions in comparison with patients with history of laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-5.3, <i>p</i> = 0.0025). The presence of adhesions was found to be strongly associated with previous abdominopelvic surgery than non-abdominopelvic surgery (odds ratio: 4.3, <i>p</i> = 0.0078, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-12.5). The most common location of the adhesions was abdominal (36.1%), mixed abdominal and pelvic (35.1%), and pelvic adhesions (28.1%). Severe adhesions were found in 36.1%; 13.6% of converted laparoscopy to open surgery was due to adhesions. Cesarean sections were significantly associated with adhesions. Patients who had cesarean sections were more likely to have adhesions than those who had not (odds ratio: 5.7, 95% confidence interval: 3.8-8.6, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Adhesiolysis was done without complications in 19.6% of patients with adhesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adhesions were prevalent in gynecological patients with previous abdominopelvic surgery. They were a significant contributor to the gynecological and reproductive issues. To minimize the risk of postoperative adhesions, laparoscopic approach should be encouraged instead of traditional surgery and rates of cesarean section should be reduced. Further high-quality studies are needed to establish conclusion and practical guidance toward the use of adhesion barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75219,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2633494120906010","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical adhesions among women undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery with or without adhesiolysis - prevalence, severity, and implications: retrospective cohort study at a University Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Naser Al-Husban,&nbsp;Yousef Elayyan,&nbsp;Malab El-Qudah,&nbsp;Bayan Aloran,&nbsp;Rima Batayneh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2633494120906010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To find out the prevalence of adhesions, severity, and their relation to the current clinical scenario and to the type of previous surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A retrospective study of patients who already had different previous abdominopelvic surgery and subsequently underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery for various indications. The patients' clinical and operative notes were reviewed and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 654 procedures performed. The most common indication for the laparoscopic surgery was secondary infertility 23.5%, followed by adnexal lesions 22.0% and primary infertility 19.6%. Intraoperative adhesions were found in 45.3%. Adhesions were deemed relevant to the clinical scenario in 21.3%. Patients who had a previous history of open (traditional) surgery were more likely to be found with adhesions in comparison with patients with history of laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-5.3, <i>p</i> = 0.0025). The presence of adhesions was found to be strongly associated with previous abdominopelvic surgery than non-abdominopelvic surgery (odds ratio: 4.3, <i>p</i> = 0.0078, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-12.5). The most common location of the adhesions was abdominal (36.1%), mixed abdominal and pelvic (35.1%), and pelvic adhesions (28.1%). Severe adhesions were found in 36.1%; 13.6% of converted laparoscopy to open surgery was due to adhesions. Cesarean sections were significantly associated with adhesions. Patients who had cesarean sections were more likely to have adhesions than those who had not (odds ratio: 5.7, 95% confidence interval: 3.8-8.6, <i>p</i> < 0.0001). Adhesiolysis was done without complications in 19.6% of patients with adhesions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adhesions were prevalent in gynecological patients with previous abdominopelvic surgery. They were a significant contributor to the gynecological and reproductive issues. To minimize the risk of postoperative adhesions, laparoscopic approach should be encouraged instead of traditional surgery and rates of cesarean section should be reduced. Further high-quality studies are needed to establish conclusion and practical guidance toward the use of adhesion barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2633494120906010\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120906010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120906010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:了解粘连的发生率、严重程度及其与当前临床情况和既往手术类型的关系。方法与材料:回顾性研究既往不同骨盆手术后因各种适应症行妇科腹腔镜手术的患者。回顾分析患者的临床和手术记录。结果:共完成654例手术。腹腔镜手术最常见的适应症为继发性不孕症(23.5%),其次为附件病变(22.0%)和原发性不孕症(19.6%)。术中粘连占45.3%。21.3%的人认为粘连与临床情况有关。与有腹腔镜手术史的患者相比,有开放(传统)手术史的患者更容易出现粘连(优势比:2.7,95%可信区间:1.4-5.3,p = 0.0025)。发现粘连的存在与既往腹部骨盆手术比非腹部骨盆手术密切相关(优势比:4.3,p = 0.0078, 95%可信区间:1.5-12.5)。最常见的粘连部位为腹部(36.1%)、腹盆腔混合粘连(35.1%)和盆腔粘连(28.1%)。严重粘连占36.1%;13.6%的腹腔镜转开腹手术是由于粘连。剖宫产与粘连显著相关。剖宫产患者比未剖宫产患者更容易出现粘连(优势比:5.7,95%可信区间:3.8-8.6,p < 0.0001)。19.6%的粘连患者进行粘连松解无并发症。结论:粘连在既往腹部骨盆手术的妇科患者中普遍存在。他们是妇科和生殖问题的重要贡献者。为了减少术后粘连的风险,应鼓励腹腔镜入路而不是传统手术,并应降低剖宫产率。需要进一步的高质量研究来建立结论和实际指导的使用粘附屏障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Surgical adhesions among women undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery with or without adhesiolysis - prevalence, severity, and implications: retrospective cohort study at a University Hospital.

Objective: To find out the prevalence of adhesions, severity, and their relation to the current clinical scenario and to the type of previous surgery.

Methods and materials: A retrospective study of patients who already had different previous abdominopelvic surgery and subsequently underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery for various indications. The patients' clinical and operative notes were reviewed and analyzed.

Results: There were 654 procedures performed. The most common indication for the laparoscopic surgery was secondary infertility 23.5%, followed by adnexal lesions 22.0% and primary infertility 19.6%. Intraoperative adhesions were found in 45.3%. Adhesions were deemed relevant to the clinical scenario in 21.3%. Patients who had a previous history of open (traditional) surgery were more likely to be found with adhesions in comparison with patients with history of laparoscopic surgery (odds ratio: 2.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.4-5.3, p = 0.0025). The presence of adhesions was found to be strongly associated with previous abdominopelvic surgery than non-abdominopelvic surgery (odds ratio: 4.3, p = 0.0078, 95% confidence interval: 1.5-12.5). The most common location of the adhesions was abdominal (36.1%), mixed abdominal and pelvic (35.1%), and pelvic adhesions (28.1%). Severe adhesions were found in 36.1%; 13.6% of converted laparoscopy to open surgery was due to adhesions. Cesarean sections were significantly associated with adhesions. Patients who had cesarean sections were more likely to have adhesions than those who had not (odds ratio: 5.7, 95% confidence interval: 3.8-8.6, p < 0.0001). Adhesiolysis was done without complications in 19.6% of patients with adhesions.

Conclusion: Adhesions were prevalent in gynecological patients with previous abdominopelvic surgery. They were a significant contributor to the gynecological and reproductive issues. To minimize the risk of postoperative adhesions, laparoscopic approach should be encouraged instead of traditional surgery and rates of cesarean section should be reduced. Further high-quality studies are needed to establish conclusion and practical guidance toward the use of adhesion barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparing visual estimation and hematocrit change in the assessment of blood loss among women undergoing cesarean delivery in a tertiary facility in northern Uganda. Exploring challenges to the uptake of sexual and reproductive health services among lesbian and bisexual women in Bulawayo, Zimbabwe: a qualitative enquiry. The role of artificial intelligence in transforming maternity services in Africa: prospects and challenges. Comparison of urine protein-creatinine ratio and urine dipstick test for significant proteinuria in preeclamptic women. Reproductive and oncologic outcomes in young women with uterine sarcoma undergoing fertility-sparing treatment: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1