硫胺素治疗心脏骤停患者的疗效:一项随机对照研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-06-08 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/2981079
Suntornwit Pradita-Ukrit, Veerapong Vattanavanit
{"title":"硫胺素治疗心脏骤停患者的疗效:一项随机对照研究。","authors":"Suntornwit Pradita-Ukrit,&nbsp;Veerapong Vattanavanit","doi":"10.1155/2020/2981079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thiamine administration has been shown to improve survival in a postcardiac arrest animal study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of thiamine in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients following return of spontaneous circulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Thirty-seven OHCA patients were randomly assigned to receive either thiamine 100 mg every 8 hours or a placebo. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the course of 2 years, 37 patients were randomized to either receive thiamine (<i>n</i> = 20) or a placebo (<i>n</i> = 17). The primary outcome was not different between the groups: 10/20 (50%) in the thiamine group vs. 8/17 (47.1%) in the placebo group (<i>P</i>=0.93 by the log-rank test). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the groups (good neurological outcome, lactate level, and S100B level).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, there were no significant differences in survival outcome. Further studies with a larger population are necessary to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"2981079"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/2981079","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Thiamine in the Treatment of Postcardiac Arrest Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Suntornwit Pradita-Ukrit,&nbsp;Veerapong Vattanavanit\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/2981079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thiamine administration has been shown to improve survival in a postcardiac arrest animal study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of thiamine in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients following return of spontaneous circulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Thirty-seven OHCA patients were randomly assigned to receive either thiamine 100 mg every 8 hours or a placebo. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the course of 2 years, 37 patients were randomized to either receive thiamine (<i>n</i> = 20) or a placebo (<i>n</i> = 17). The primary outcome was not different between the groups: 10/20 (50%) in the thiamine group vs. 8/17 (47.1%) in the placebo group (<i>P</i>=0.93 by the log-rank test). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the groups (good neurological outcome, lactate level, and S100B level).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, there were no significant differences in survival outcome. Further studies with a larger population are necessary to confirm these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"2981079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/2981079\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2981079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2981079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:在一项心脏骤停后的动物研究中,硫胺素已被证明可以提高生存率。我们的目的是评估硫胺素在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)昏迷患者恢复自然循环后的疗效。方法:采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。37名OHCA患者被随机分配接受每8小时100毫克的硫胺素或安慰剂。主要终点为28天全因死亡率。结果:在2年的研究过程中,37名患者被随机分配接受硫胺素治疗(n = 20)或安慰剂治疗(n = 17)。两组间的主要结局无差异:硫胺素组为10/20(50%),安慰剂组为8/17 (47.1%)(log-rank检验P=0.93)。两组间的次要结局(良好的神经预后、乳酸水平和S100B水平)无显著差异。结论:在本研究中,两组患者的生存结局无显著差异。需要对更大的人群进行进一步的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Thiamine in the Treatment of Postcardiac Arrest Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background: Thiamine administration has been shown to improve survival in a postcardiac arrest animal study. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of thiamine in comatose out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients following return of spontaneous circulation.

Methods: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study was conducted. Thirty-seven OHCA patients were randomly assigned to receive either thiamine 100 mg every 8 hours or a placebo. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality.

Results: Over the course of 2 years, 37 patients were randomized to either receive thiamine (n = 20) or a placebo (n = 17). The primary outcome was not different between the groups: 10/20 (50%) in the thiamine group vs. 8/17 (47.1%) in the placebo group (P=0.93 by the log-rank test). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the groups (good neurological outcome, lactate level, and S100B level).

Conclusions: In this study, there were no significant differences in survival outcome. Further studies with a larger population are necessary to confirm these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Hemodynamic Management and Postoperative Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A Prospective Observational Study. Efficacy of COVID-19 Treatments in Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Assessment of Satisfaction Levels Among Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Serum Concentration at 24 h With Intensive Beta-Lactam Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study: Beta-Lactam Blood Levels in Sepsis. Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1