“一路前行”:一项探讨患者和护理人员对癌症护理决策认知的定性研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2020-06-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2381468320933576
Laura M Holdsworth, Dani Zionts, Steven M Asch, Marcy Winget
{"title":"“一路前行”:一项探讨患者和护理人员对癌症护理决策认知的定性研究。","authors":"Laura M Holdsworth,&nbsp;Dani Zionts,&nbsp;Steven M Asch,&nbsp;Marcy Winget","doi":"10.1177/2381468320933576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Shared decision making is a cornerstone of an informed consent process for cancer treatment, yet there are often many physician and patient-related barriers to participation in the process. Decisions in cancer care are often perceived as relating to a discrete, treatment decision event, yet there is evidence that decisions are longitudinal in nature and reflect a multifactorial experience. <b>Objective.</b> To explore patient and caregiver perceptions of the choices and decision-making opportunities within cancer care. <b>Design.</b> Qualitative in-depth interviews with 37 cancer patients and 7 caregivers carried out as part of an evaluation of a cancer center's effort to improve patient experience. <b>Results.</b> Participants described decision making related to four distinct phases in complex cancer care, with physicians leading, and often limiting, decisions related to disease assessment and treatment options and access, and patients leading decisions related to physician selection. Though physicians led many decisions, patients had a moderating influence on treatment, such that if patients did not like options presented, they would reconsider their options and sometimes switch physicians. Patients had various strategies for dealing with uncertainty when faced with decisions, such as seeking additional information to make an informed choice or making a conscious choice to defer decision making to the physician. <b>Limitations.</b> Patients were sampled from one academic cancer center that serves a predominantly Caucasian, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino population and received complex treatment. <b>Conclusion.</b> Because of the complexity of cancer treatment, many patients felt as though they were a \"passenger\" in decision making about care and did not lead many of the decisions, though many patients trusted their doctors to make the best decisions and were comforted by their expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"2381468320933576"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2381468320933576","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Along for the Ride\\\": A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Decision Making in Cancer Care.\",\"authors\":\"Laura M Holdsworth,&nbsp;Dani Zionts,&nbsp;Steven M Asch,&nbsp;Marcy Winget\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2381468320933576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Shared decision making is a cornerstone of an informed consent process for cancer treatment, yet there are often many physician and patient-related barriers to participation in the process. Decisions in cancer care are often perceived as relating to a discrete, treatment decision event, yet there is evidence that decisions are longitudinal in nature and reflect a multifactorial experience. <b>Objective.</b> To explore patient and caregiver perceptions of the choices and decision-making opportunities within cancer care. <b>Design.</b> Qualitative in-depth interviews with 37 cancer patients and 7 caregivers carried out as part of an evaluation of a cancer center's effort to improve patient experience. <b>Results.</b> Participants described decision making related to four distinct phases in complex cancer care, with physicians leading, and often limiting, decisions related to disease assessment and treatment options and access, and patients leading decisions related to physician selection. Though physicians led many decisions, patients had a moderating influence on treatment, such that if patients did not like options presented, they would reconsider their options and sometimes switch physicians. Patients had various strategies for dealing with uncertainty when faced with decisions, such as seeking additional information to make an informed choice or making a conscious choice to defer decision making to the physician. <b>Limitations.</b> Patients were sampled from one academic cancer center that serves a predominantly Caucasian, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino population and received complex treatment. <b>Conclusion.</b> Because of the complexity of cancer treatment, many patients felt as though they were a \\\"passenger\\\" in decision making about care and did not lead many of the decisions, though many patients trusted their doctors to make the best decisions and were comforted by their expertise.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"2381468320933576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2381468320933576\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MDM Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468320933576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468320933576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景。共同决策是癌症治疗知情同意过程的基石,但参与这一过程往往存在许多与医生和患者相关的障碍。癌症治疗中的决策通常被认为与离散的治疗决策事件有关,但有证据表明,决策本质上是纵向的,反映了多因素的经验。目标。探讨患者和护理人员对癌症护理中选择和决策机会的看法。设计。对37名癌症患者和7名护理人员进行了定性深入访谈,作为评估癌症中心改善患者体验的努力的一部分。结果。参与者描述了与复杂癌症治疗的四个不同阶段相关的决策,其中医生主导并通常限制与疾病评估、治疗方案和获取相关的决策,而患者主导与医生选择相关的决策。虽然医生主导了许多决定,但患者对治疗的影响是适度的,因此,如果患者不喜欢所提供的选择,他们会重新考虑他们的选择,有时会更换医生。当面对决定时,患者有不同的策略来处理不确定性,比如寻求额外的信息来做出明智的选择,或者有意识地选择将决策推迟给医生。的局限性。患者样本来自一个学术癌症中心,该中心主要服务于高加索人、亚洲人和西班牙/拉丁裔人群,并接受了复杂的治疗。结论。由于癌症治疗的复杂性,许多患者觉得自己在护理决策中只是一个“乘客”,并没有主导很多决定,尽管许多患者相信他们的医生会做出最好的决定,并对他们的专业知识感到欣慰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Along for the Ride": A Qualitative Study Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of Decision Making in Cancer Care.

Background. Shared decision making is a cornerstone of an informed consent process for cancer treatment, yet there are often many physician and patient-related barriers to participation in the process. Decisions in cancer care are often perceived as relating to a discrete, treatment decision event, yet there is evidence that decisions are longitudinal in nature and reflect a multifactorial experience. Objective. To explore patient and caregiver perceptions of the choices and decision-making opportunities within cancer care. Design. Qualitative in-depth interviews with 37 cancer patients and 7 caregivers carried out as part of an evaluation of a cancer center's effort to improve patient experience. Results. Participants described decision making related to four distinct phases in complex cancer care, with physicians leading, and often limiting, decisions related to disease assessment and treatment options and access, and patients leading decisions related to physician selection. Though physicians led many decisions, patients had a moderating influence on treatment, such that if patients did not like options presented, they would reconsider their options and sometimes switch physicians. Patients had various strategies for dealing with uncertainty when faced with decisions, such as seeking additional information to make an informed choice or making a conscious choice to defer decision making to the physician. Limitations. Patients were sampled from one academic cancer center that serves a predominantly Caucasian, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino population and received complex treatment. Conclusion. Because of the complexity of cancer treatment, many patients felt as though they were a "passenger" in decision making about care and did not lead many of the decisions, though many patients trusted their doctors to make the best decisions and were comforted by their expertise.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prioritizing Patients from the Most Deprived Areas on Elective Waiting Lists in the NHS in England: Estimating the Health and Health Inequality Impact. Optimizing Masks and Random Screening Test Usage within K-12 Schools. Associations of Concordant and Shared Lung Cancer Screening Decision Making with Decisional Conflict: A Multi-Institution Cross-Sectional Analysis. Implications of Diminishing Lifespan Marginal Utility for Valuing Equity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Evaluation of the Soda Tax on Obesity and Diabetes in California: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1