基于正念的认知疗法治疗广泛性焦虑障碍:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

Q3 Medicine East Asian Archives of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.12809/eaap1885
S Ghahari, K Mohammadi-Hasel, S K Malakouti, M Roshanpajouh
{"title":"基于正念的认知疗法治疗广泛性焦虑障碍:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"S Ghahari,&nbsp;K Mohammadi-Hasel,&nbsp;S K Malakouti,&nbsp;M Roshanpajouh","doi":"10.12809/eaap1885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) has harmful effects on physical and mental health and quality of life. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a treatment option for GAD. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of MBCT on GAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two authors independently performed the eligibility, quality assessment, and data extraction processes, and consensus was reached in case of discrepancies. Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies (randomised controlled trials, randomised trials, cluster randomised controlled trials, and clinical trials) up to November 2018 using keywords: mindfulness-based cognitive therapy OR mindfulness based cognitive therapy OR MBCT AND general anxiety disorder OR GAD*. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the revised Jadad scale. Cohen's formula was used to determine the effect size based on the mean and standard deviation of the changes in the study groups before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies that compared the effectiveness between MBCT and controls were included for analysis. The mean revised Jadad score of the six studies was 4.3 (range, 3-6). The overall mean effect size was -0.65. The funnel plot of effect sizes in relation to the effect size standard error showed a symmetrical distribution. Compared with controls, MBCT significantly improved the treatment outcome of GAD in all studies, except one.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MBCT was effective for treating GAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":39171,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Generalised Anxiety Disorder: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"S Ghahari,&nbsp;K Mohammadi-Hasel,&nbsp;S K Malakouti,&nbsp;M Roshanpajouh\",\"doi\":\"10.12809/eaap1885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) has harmful effects on physical and mental health and quality of life. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a treatment option for GAD. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of MBCT on GAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two authors independently performed the eligibility, quality assessment, and data extraction processes, and consensus was reached in case of discrepancies. Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies (randomised controlled trials, randomised trials, cluster randomised controlled trials, and clinical trials) up to November 2018 using keywords: mindfulness-based cognitive therapy OR mindfulness based cognitive therapy OR MBCT AND general anxiety disorder OR GAD*. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the revised Jadad scale. Cohen's formula was used to determine the effect size based on the mean and standard deviation of the changes in the study groups before and after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies that compared the effectiveness between MBCT and controls were included for analysis. The mean revised Jadad score of the six studies was 4.3 (range, 3-6). The overall mean effect size was -0.65. The funnel plot of effect sizes in relation to the effect size standard error showed a symmetrical distribution. Compared with controls, MBCT significantly improved the treatment outcome of GAD in all studies, except one.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MBCT was effective for treating GAD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap1885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap1885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

背景:广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)对身心健康和生活质量有不良影响。正念认知疗法(MBCT)是广泛性焦虑症的一种治疗选择。本荟萃分析旨在确定MBCT治疗广泛性焦虑症的有效性。方法:两名作者独立进行资格、质量评估和数据提取过程,如有差异,达成共识。电子数据库检索符合条件的研究(随机对照试验,随机试验,聚类随机对照试验和临床试验),截止2018年11月,使用关键词:基于正念的认知疗法或基于正念的认知疗法或MBCT和一般焦虑症或GAD*。采用修订后的Jadad量表评估研究的方法学质量。根据实验组干预前后变化的均值和标准差,采用Cohen公式确定效应大小。结果:六项比较MBCT与对照组疗效的研究纳入分析。6项研究的修正Jadad平均评分为4.3(范围3-6)。总体平均效应值为-0.65。效应量与效应量标准误差的漏斗图呈对称分布。与对照组相比,除一项研究外,MBCT在所有研究中均显著改善了GAD的治疗效果。结论:MBCT治疗广泛性焦虑症疗效显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Generalised Anxiety Disorder: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) has harmful effects on physical and mental health and quality of life. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is a treatment option for GAD. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of MBCT on GAD.

Methods: Two authors independently performed the eligibility, quality assessment, and data extraction processes, and consensus was reached in case of discrepancies. Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies (randomised controlled trials, randomised trials, cluster randomised controlled trials, and clinical trials) up to November 2018 using keywords: mindfulness-based cognitive therapy OR mindfulness based cognitive therapy OR MBCT AND general anxiety disorder OR GAD*. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the revised Jadad scale. Cohen's formula was used to determine the effect size based on the mean and standard deviation of the changes in the study groups before and after the intervention.

Results: Six studies that compared the effectiveness between MBCT and controls were included for analysis. The mean revised Jadad score of the six studies was 4.3 (range, 3-6). The overall mean effect size was -0.65. The funnel plot of effect sizes in relation to the effect size standard error showed a symmetrical distribution. Compared with controls, MBCT significantly improved the treatment outcome of GAD in all studies, except one.

Conclusion: MBCT was effective for treating GAD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Developing the Youth Mental Health Clinic in Hong Kong: refocus and revisit of clinical practice for youth in the new millennium. Factor analysis of the Chinese version of the Autism Spectrum Quotient 10 and its association with schizotypal traits in adolescents and young adults in Hong Kong. Normal pressure hydrocephalus disguising psychosis: a case report. Paediatric bipolar disorder with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a case report. Rivastigmine for treatment-refractory posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1