烧伤中心对坏死性筋膜炎的管理:结果是否有所不同?

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2020-06-30 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2059513120924749
Joseph A Ward, John A G Gibson, Dai Q Nguyen
{"title":"烧伤中心对坏死性筋膜炎的管理:结果是否有所不同?","authors":"Joseph A Ward, John A G Gibson, Dai Q Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/2059513120924749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution's designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008-2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, <i>P</i>=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, <i>P</i>=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, <i>P</i>=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/92/10.1177_2059513120924749.PMC7328481.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A Ward, John A G Gibson, Dai Q Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2059513120924749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution's designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008-2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, <i>P</i>=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, <i>P</i>=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, <i>P</i>=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/92/10.1177_2059513120924749.PMC7328481.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120924749\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120924749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:坏死性筋膜炎(NF)患者的护理与烧伤患者的护理有许多相似之处。每类患者人数不多,但病情复杂,需要多次前往医院、进行专业重建、细致的伤口护理和多学科管理。在六年的时间里,我们试图研究在烧伤中心治疗的 NF 患者与在整形外科服务机构治疗的 NF 患者的临床疗效:我们对 2008-2014 年间转诊至本机构指定烧伤中心或整形外科的所有可识别患者进行了回顾性病例记录审查。对患者特征、住院时间、伤口相关结果和临床结果进行了提取和描述,并对存活率和住院时间进行了统计分析:研究共纳入 29 名患者(烧伤中心[B]:17 名患者;整形外科[P]:12 名患者)。总住院时间中位数(B:37 天 vs. P:50 天,P=0.38)、局部住院时间中位数(27 天 vs. 19 天,P=0.29)和出院存活率中位数(94.4% vs. 100%,P=0.73)在统计学上没有显著差异:结论:在烧伤中心治疗 NF 患者更容易获得专业的重建知识和多学科护理,但在住院时间或存活率方面并没有统计学意义上的显著差异。在烧伤中心对 NF 患者进行管理有助于为这一极具挑战性的患者群体提供高质量的护理服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?

Introduction: Many similarities exist between the care of necrotising fasciitis (NF) and burn injury patients. Each group represents a small but complex cohort requiring multiple theatre trips, specialist reconstruction, meticulous wound care and multidisciplinary management. Over a six-year period, we sought to examine the clinical outcomes of NF patients managed within a burns centre against those managed by a plastic surgery service.

Methods: A retrospective case-note review was performed for all identifiable patients referred to our institution's designated burns centre or plastic surgery service between 2008-2014. Patient characteristics, length of stay, wound-related and clinical outcomes were extracted and descriptively presented with statistical analysis performed for survival and length of stay.

Results: Twenty-nine patients were included in the study (burns centre [B]: 17 patients; plastic surgery service [P]: 12 patients). Median total length of stay (B: 37 vs. P: 50 days, P=0.38), local length of stay (27 vs. 19 days, P=0.29) and survival till discharge (94.4% vs. 100%, P=0.73) demonstrated no statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: Caring for NF patients within a burns centre facilitated easier access to specialist reconstructive expertise and multidisciplinary care but did not lead to statistically significant differences in length of stay or survival. The management of NF within a burns centre facilitated provision of high-quality care to a highly challenging patient group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1