Victoria T Rizk, Arash O Naghavi, Andrew S Brohl, David M Joyce, Odion Binitie, Youngchul Kim, John P Hanna, Jennifer Swank, Ricardo J Gonzalez, Damon R Reed, Mihaela Druta
{"title":"化疗改善了肢体/躯干局部高级别软组织肉瘤的远程控制。","authors":"Victoria T Rizk, Arash O Naghavi, Andrew S Brohl, David M Joyce, Odion Binitie, Youngchul Kim, John P Hanna, Jennifer Swank, Ricardo J Gonzalez, Damon R Reed, Mihaela Druta","doi":"10.1186/s13569-020-00132-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and heterogeneous tumors making chemotherapy use controversial. Our goal was to identify a subset of patients with primary STS that benefit with the addition of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review included intermediate to high-grade localized primary STS of the extremity/trunk, and tumor size > 5 cm. The effect of chemotherapy was evaluated for local control (LC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort (n = 273), patients were treated with surgery (98%), radiation (81%), and chemotherapy (24.5%). With a median follow-up of 51 months, the entire cohort's 5-year LC, DC, PFS, and OS are 79.1%, 59.9%, 43.8%, and 68.7%, respectively. The addition of chemotherapy did not provide a DC benefit (p = 0.238) for the entire cohort. High-grade disease (n = 210) experienced a 5-year benefit in DC (68% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.04), which was more pronounced with MAI (Mesna, Adriamycin, Ifosfamide) based regimens (74.2%, p = 0.016), and a 5-year PFS (50.8% vs 45%, p = 0.025) and OS benefit (76.2% vs 70%, p = 0.067) vs. no chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis of the high-grade subset, chemotherapy independently predicted for a DC benefit (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.26-89, p = 0.019). The benefit of chemotherapy was more pronounced with MAI, showing a significant benefit in DC (HR 0.333 95% CI 0.145-0.767, p = 0.01) and PFS (HR 0.52 95% CI 0.28-0.99, p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with localized STS > 5 cm, the high-grade subset had a distant control benefit with the addition of chemotherapy, leading to improved progression free survival. This is more pronounced with the use of MAI and should be considered in patients eligible for this regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":10684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-020-00132-w","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemotherapy improves distant control in localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity/trunk.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria T Rizk, Arash O Naghavi, Andrew S Brohl, David M Joyce, Odion Binitie, Youngchul Kim, John P Hanna, Jennifer Swank, Ricardo J Gonzalez, Damon R Reed, Mihaela Druta\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13569-020-00132-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and heterogeneous tumors making chemotherapy use controversial. Our goal was to identify a subset of patients with primary STS that benefit with the addition of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review included intermediate to high-grade localized primary STS of the extremity/trunk, and tumor size > 5 cm. The effect of chemotherapy was evaluated for local control (LC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort (n = 273), patients were treated with surgery (98%), radiation (81%), and chemotherapy (24.5%). With a median follow-up of 51 months, the entire cohort's 5-year LC, DC, PFS, and OS are 79.1%, 59.9%, 43.8%, and 68.7%, respectively. The addition of chemotherapy did not provide a DC benefit (p = 0.238) for the entire cohort. High-grade disease (n = 210) experienced a 5-year benefit in DC (68% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.04), which was more pronounced with MAI (Mesna, Adriamycin, Ifosfamide) based regimens (74.2%, p = 0.016), and a 5-year PFS (50.8% vs 45%, p = 0.025) and OS benefit (76.2% vs 70%, p = 0.067) vs. no chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis of the high-grade subset, chemotherapy independently predicted for a DC benefit (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.26-89, p = 0.019). The benefit of chemotherapy was more pronounced with MAI, showing a significant benefit in DC (HR 0.333 95% CI 0.145-0.767, p = 0.01) and PFS (HR 0.52 95% CI 0.28-0.99, p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with localized STS > 5 cm, the high-grade subset had a distant control benefit with the addition of chemotherapy, leading to improved progression free survival. This is more pronounced with the use of MAI and should be considered in patients eligible for this regimen.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-020-00132-w\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-020-00132-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-020-00132-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:软组织肉瘤(STS)是一种罕见且异质性的肿瘤,使得化疗的使用存在争议。我们的目标是确定原发性STS患者的亚群,这些患者可以从化疗中获益。方法:回顾性回顾包括中度至高度局限性原发性四肢/躯干STS,肿瘤大小> 5cm。评估化疗的局部控制(LC)、远处控制(DC)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果:在该队列(n = 273)中,患者接受了手术(98%)、放疗(81%)和化疗(24.5%)。中位随访为51个月,整个队列的5年LC、DC、PFS和OS分别为79.1%、59.9%、43.8%和68.7%。化疗的增加并没有为整个队列提供DC获益(p = 0.238)。高级别疾病(n = 210)在DC中经历了5年的获益(68%对54.4%,p = 0.04),这在MAI (Mesna,阿霉素,异环磷酰胺)为基础的方案中更为明显(74.2%,p = 0.016), 5年PFS(50.8%对45%,p = 0.025)和OS获益(76.2%对70%,p = 0.067)与无化疗相比。在高级别亚组的多变量分析中,化疗独立预测DC获益(HR 0.48 95% CI 0.26-89, p = 0.019)。化疗的益处在MAI中更为明显,在DC (HR 0.333 95% CI 0.145-0.767, p = 0.01)和PFS (HR 0.52 95% CI 0.28-0.99, p = 0.047)中显示出显著的益处。结论:在局限性STS > 5 cm的患者中,随着化疗的增加,高级别亚组具有远期控制优势,导致无进展生存期的改善。这在使用MAI时更为明显,在符合该方案的患者中应予以考虑。
Chemotherapy improves distant control in localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity/trunk.
Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and heterogeneous tumors making chemotherapy use controversial. Our goal was to identify a subset of patients with primary STS that benefit with the addition of chemotherapy.
Methods: A retrospective chart review included intermediate to high-grade localized primary STS of the extremity/trunk, and tumor size > 5 cm. The effect of chemotherapy was evaluated for local control (LC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
Results: In this cohort (n = 273), patients were treated with surgery (98%), radiation (81%), and chemotherapy (24.5%). With a median follow-up of 51 months, the entire cohort's 5-year LC, DC, PFS, and OS are 79.1%, 59.9%, 43.8%, and 68.7%, respectively. The addition of chemotherapy did not provide a DC benefit (p = 0.238) for the entire cohort. High-grade disease (n = 210) experienced a 5-year benefit in DC (68% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.04), which was more pronounced with MAI (Mesna, Adriamycin, Ifosfamide) based regimens (74.2%, p = 0.016), and a 5-year PFS (50.8% vs 45%, p = 0.025) and OS benefit (76.2% vs 70%, p = 0.067) vs. no chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis of the high-grade subset, chemotherapy independently predicted for a DC benefit (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.26-89, p = 0.019). The benefit of chemotherapy was more pronounced with MAI, showing a significant benefit in DC (HR 0.333 95% CI 0.145-0.767, p = 0.01) and PFS (HR 0.52 95% CI 0.28-0.99, p = 0.047).
Conclusion: In patients with localized STS > 5 cm, the high-grade subset had a distant control benefit with the addition of chemotherapy, leading to improved progression free survival. This is more pronounced with the use of MAI and should be considered in patients eligible for this regimen.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Sarcoma Research considers for publication articles related to research on sarcomas, including both soft tissue and bone. The journal publishes original articles and review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas along with new insights in sarcoma research, which may be of immediate or future interest for diagnosis and treatment. The journal also considers negative results, especially those from studies on new agents, as it is vital for the medical community to learn whether new agents have been proven effective or ineffective within subtypes of sarcomas. The journal also aims to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest for the sarcoma community, which may be related to both research results and methodological topics.