妇女在设施分娩期间对尊重产妇护理的看法。

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and Gynecology International Pub Date : 2020-07-04 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/5142398
Pratima Pathak, Bijaya Ghimire
{"title":"妇女在设施分娩期间对尊重产妇护理的看法。","authors":"Pratima Pathak, Bijaya Ghimire","doi":"10.1155/2020/5142398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respectful care during childbirth has been described as \"a universal human right that encompasses the principles of ethics and respect for women's feelings, dignity, choices, and preferences.\" Many women experience a lack of respectful and abusive care during childbirth across the globe.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine women's perception of respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 mothers admitted to the maternity ward of Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital using a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through an interview technique by using a validated tool containing 15 items each measured on a scale of 5. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 16 was used for data analysis. Frequency, percentage, mean score, standard deviation, chi-square test, and binary logistic regression were used to analyze descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 84.7% of the women reported that they have experienced overall RMC services with a mean score ± SD (61.70 ± 12.12). Though the majority of the women reported that they have experienced RMC services, they also revealed that they have experienced disrespectful care in various forms such as being shouted upon (30.0%), being slapped (18.7%), delayed service provision (22.7%), and not talking positively about pain and relief during childbirth (28.0%). Likewise, length of stay, parity, and time of delivery were found as factors that influenced friendly care (COR = 0.383, 95% CI: 0.157-0.934), abuse-free care (COR = 3.663, 95% CI: 1.607-8.349), and timely care (COR = 2.050, 95% CI: 1.031-4.076) dimensions of RMC, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though RMC emphasizes eliminating disrespectful and abusive environment from health facilities, 15.0% of participants perceived that they have not experienced overall RMC services. So, the health facility should focus on the interventions which ensure that every woman receives this basic human dignity during one of the most vulnerable times in their lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2020 ","pages":"5142398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/5142398","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of Women regarding Respectful Maternity Care during Facility-Based Childbirth.\",\"authors\":\"Pratima Pathak, Bijaya Ghimire\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/5142398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Respectful care during childbirth has been described as \\\"a universal human right that encompasses the principles of ethics and respect for women's feelings, dignity, choices, and preferences.\\\" Many women experience a lack of respectful and abusive care during childbirth across the globe.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine women's perception of respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 mothers admitted to the maternity ward of Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital using a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through an interview technique by using a validated tool containing 15 items each measured on a scale of 5. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 16 was used for data analysis. Frequency, percentage, mean score, standard deviation, chi-square test, and binary logistic regression were used to analyze descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 84.7% of the women reported that they have experienced overall RMC services with a mean score ± SD (61.70 ± 12.12). Though the majority of the women reported that they have experienced RMC services, they also revealed that they have experienced disrespectful care in various forms such as being shouted upon (30.0%), being slapped (18.7%), delayed service provision (22.7%), and not talking positively about pain and relief during childbirth (28.0%). Likewise, length of stay, parity, and time of delivery were found as factors that influenced friendly care (COR = 0.383, 95% CI: 0.157-0.934), abuse-free care (COR = 3.663, 95% CI: 1.607-8.349), and timely care (COR = 2.050, 95% CI: 1.031-4.076) dimensions of RMC, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even though RMC emphasizes eliminating disrespectful and abusive environment from health facilities, 15.0% of participants perceived that they have not experienced overall RMC services. So, the health facility should focus on the interventions which ensure that every woman receives this basic human dignity during one of the most vulnerable times in their lives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"5142398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/5142398\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5142398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5142398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

背景:分娩期间的尊重性护理被描述为“一项普遍的人权,包括道德原则和尊重妇女的感情、尊严、选择和偏好。”在全球范围内,许多妇女在分娩过程中缺乏尊重和虐待。目的:本研究的目的是确定妇女的感知尊重产妇护理(RMC)在设施分娩。方法:采用有目的抽样方法,对尼泊尔医学院和教学医院产科病房收治的150名母亲进行描述性横断面研究。数据通过访谈技术收集,使用一个经过验证的工具,其中包含15个项目,每个项目按5分进行测量。数据分析采用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science)第16版。采用频率、百分比、均分、标准差、卡方检验和二元logistic回归分析描述性统计和推理统计。结果:总共有84.7%的女性报告她们经历了RMC服务,平均评分±SD(61.70±12.12)。虽然大多数女性报告说她们经历过RMC服务,但她们也透露她们经历过各种形式的不尊重照顾,如被大喊大叫(30.0%),被打耳光(18.7%),延迟服务(22.7%),以及不积极谈论分娩时的疼痛和缓解(28.0%)。同样,住院时间、胎次和分娩时间分别是影响RMC友好护理(COR = 0.383, 95% CI: 0.157-0.934)、无虐待护理(COR = 3.663, 95% CI: 1.607-8.349)和及时护理(COR = 2.050, 95% CI: 1.031-4.076)维度的因素。结论:尽管RMC强调消除卫生设施中的不尊重和虐待环境,但15.0%的参与者认为他们没有体验到RMC的整体服务。因此,卫生机构应侧重于采取干预措施,确保每一位妇女在其生命中最脆弱的时期之一获得这种基本的人的尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perception of Women regarding Respectful Maternity Care during Facility-Based Childbirth.

Background: Respectful care during childbirth has been described as "a universal human right that encompasses the principles of ethics and respect for women's feelings, dignity, choices, and preferences." Many women experience a lack of respectful and abusive care during childbirth across the globe.

Objective: This study aimed to determine women's perception of respectful maternity care (RMC) during facility-based childbirth.

Method: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 mothers admitted to the maternity ward of Nepal Medical College and Teaching Hospital using a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through an interview technique by using a validated tool containing 15 items each measured on a scale of 5. Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 16 was used for data analysis. Frequency, percentage, mean score, standard deviation, chi-square test, and binary logistic regression were used to analyze descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: In total, 84.7% of the women reported that they have experienced overall RMC services with a mean score ± SD (61.70 ± 12.12). Though the majority of the women reported that they have experienced RMC services, they also revealed that they have experienced disrespectful care in various forms such as being shouted upon (30.0%), being slapped (18.7%), delayed service provision (22.7%), and not talking positively about pain and relief during childbirth (28.0%). Likewise, length of stay, parity, and time of delivery were found as factors that influenced friendly care (COR = 0.383, 95% CI: 0.157-0.934), abuse-free care (COR = 3.663, 95% CI: 1.607-8.349), and timely care (COR = 2.050, 95% CI: 1.031-4.076) dimensions of RMC, respectively.

Conclusion: Even though RMC emphasizes eliminating disrespectful and abusive environment from health facilities, 15.0% of participants perceived that they have not experienced overall RMC services. So, the health facility should focus on the interventions which ensure that every woman receives this basic human dignity during one of the most vulnerable times in their lives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Obstetrics and Gynecology International OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.
期刊最新文献
BRCA1 Protein Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer and Associated Clinicopathological Factors in Uganda. The Effect of "Motivational Interviewing" and "Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills Model" Counseling Interventions on the Choice of Delivery Mode in Pregnant Women Using Face-to-Face Training vs. Mobile App: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Factors Influencing Induction of Labor Success in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccine Impact on Women's Menstrual Health within an 18-Month Follow-Up. Association of Hormonal Contraceptives with Depression among Women in Reproductive Age Groups: A Cross-Sectional Analytic Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1