José María Ramada, Ana Beltran Fonollosa, Consol Serra, Fernando G Benavides
{"title":"[某三级公立医院微生物学及临床分析实验室工作人员有刺激性症状的暴发研究]。","authors":"José María Ramada, Ana Beltran Fonollosa, Consol Serra, Fernando G Benavides","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2020.23.03.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In April 2018, an unusually high number of eye, throat and nose irritative symptoms, nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms and dizziness were identified in workers in the microbiology (LAM) and clinical analysis (LCA) laboratories of a tertiary public hospital in Mallorca; these symptoms were also associated with perception of unusual odors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To confirm the presence of an outbreak, identify its causes, and contribute to itsprevention and control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Epidemiological study of the outbreak involving qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative component was based on conducting focus groups The quantitative study allowed us to develop epidemic curves, based on employee visits to the hospital'soccupational health service (OHS) due to either symptoms or episodes of sickness absence (SA). Lastly, available industrial hygiene reports were reviewed to examine possible relationships with the distribution of cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two operational case definitions were established through the focus groups, along with identification of possible explanations for the outbreak based on employee perception.The quantitative study confirmed the outbreak in the LAM, but not in the LCA. The SA episodes in the LAM between weeks 16 and 39 exceeded the number of expected cases fourfold. We also detected an excess of visits to the OHS during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quantitative study confirmed an epidemic outbreak that has since ended, although the qualitative study indicated the persistence of bad smell and discomfort. The improvement of epidemiological surveillance systems as a result of the study will facilitate the monitoring and control of future possible outbreaks.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":"23 3","pages":"330-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Outbreak study of workers with irritative symptomswoking in the microbiology and clinical analysis laboratories of a tertiary public hospital].\",\"authors\":\"José María Ramada, Ana Beltran Fonollosa, Consol Serra, Fernando G Benavides\",\"doi\":\"10.12961/aprl.2020.23.03.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In April 2018, an unusually high number of eye, throat and nose irritative symptoms, nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms and dizziness were identified in workers in the microbiology (LAM) and clinical analysis (LCA) laboratories of a tertiary public hospital in Mallorca; these symptoms were also associated with perception of unusual odors.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To confirm the presence of an outbreak, identify its causes, and contribute to itsprevention and control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Epidemiological study of the outbreak involving qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative component was based on conducting focus groups The quantitative study allowed us to develop epidemic curves, based on employee visits to the hospital'soccupational health service (OHS) due to either symptoms or episodes of sickness absence (SA). Lastly, available industrial hygiene reports were reviewed to examine possible relationships with the distribution of cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two operational case definitions were established through the focus groups, along with identification of possible explanations for the outbreak based on employee perception.The quantitative study confirmed the outbreak in the LAM, but not in the LCA. The SA episodes in the LAM between weeks 16 and 39 exceeded the number of expected cases fourfold. We also detected an excess of visits to the OHS during the same time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quantitative study confirmed an epidemic outbreak that has since ended, although the qualitative study indicated the persistence of bad smell and discomfort. The improvement of epidemiological surveillance systems as a result of the study will facilitate the monitoring and control of future possible outbreaks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"330-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2020.23.03.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2020.23.03.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Outbreak study of workers with irritative symptomswoking in the microbiology and clinical analysis laboratories of a tertiary public hospital].
Background: In April 2018, an unusually high number of eye, throat and nose irritative symptoms, nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms and dizziness were identified in workers in the microbiology (LAM) and clinical analysis (LCA) laboratories of a tertiary public hospital in Mallorca; these symptoms were also associated with perception of unusual odors.
Objective: To confirm the presence of an outbreak, identify its causes, and contribute to itsprevention and control.
Methods: Epidemiological study of the outbreak involving qualitative and quantitative methods. The qualitative component was based on conducting focus groups The quantitative study allowed us to develop epidemic curves, based on employee visits to the hospital'soccupational health service (OHS) due to either symptoms or episodes of sickness absence (SA). Lastly, available industrial hygiene reports were reviewed to examine possible relationships with the distribution of cases.
Results: Two operational case definitions were established through the focus groups, along with identification of possible explanations for the outbreak based on employee perception.The quantitative study confirmed the outbreak in the LAM, but not in the LCA. The SA episodes in the LAM between weeks 16 and 39 exceeded the number of expected cases fourfold. We also detected an excess of visits to the OHS during the same time period.
Conclusions: The quantitative study confirmed an epidemic outbreak that has since ended, although the qualitative study indicated the persistence of bad smell and discomfort. The improvement of epidemiological surveillance systems as a result of the study will facilitate the monitoring and control of future possible outbreaks.