在一个大型泌尿外科社区实践中建立一个集中的、具有成本效益的呼叫中心。

Reviews in urology Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Stephen F Kappa, Chris McClain, Krista Wallace, Paul Cinquina, Don Lawson, Mary M Smith, Earl Walz, Brooke Edwards, Gary M Kirsh
{"title":"在一个大型泌尿外科社区实践中建立一个集中的、具有成本效益的呼叫中心。","authors":"Stephen F Kappa,&nbsp;Chris McClain,&nbsp;Krista Wallace,&nbsp;Paul Cinquina,&nbsp;Don Lawson,&nbsp;Mary M Smith,&nbsp;Earl Walz,&nbsp;Brooke Edwards,&nbsp;Gary M Kirsh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Call centers provide front-line care and service to patients. This study compared call-answering efficiency and costs between the implementation of an internal, centralized call center (January to July 2019) and previously outsourced call-center services (January to July 2018) for a large urology community practice. Retrospective review of call metrics and cost data was performed. Internal call-center leadership, training, and culture was examined through survey of staff and management. A total of 299,028 calls with an average of 5751 calls per week were answered during the study periods. The Average Speed of Answer (ASA) was 1:42 (min:s) for the outsourced call center and 0:14 for the internal call center (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with 70% of outsourced calls answered under 2 minutes compared with 99% of calls for the internal call center (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The Average Handle Time (AHT) for each outsourced call was 5:32 versus 3:41 for the internal call center (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The total operating expenses were 7.7% lower for the internal call center. Surveys revealed the importance of engaged leadership and staff training with feedback, simplified work algorithms, and expanded clinical roles. We found that internal, centralized call centers may provide a call-answering solution with greater efficiency and lower total operating expense versus an outsourced call center for large surgical practices. A culture that emphasizes continuous improvement and empowers call-center staff with expanded clinical roles may ultimately enhance patient communication and service.</p>","PeriodicalId":21185,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in urology","volume":"22 2","pages":"67-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393684/pdf/RiU022002_0067.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a Centralized, Cost-effective Call Center in a Large Urology Community Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen F Kappa,&nbsp;Chris McClain,&nbsp;Krista Wallace,&nbsp;Paul Cinquina,&nbsp;Don Lawson,&nbsp;Mary M Smith,&nbsp;Earl Walz,&nbsp;Brooke Edwards,&nbsp;Gary M Kirsh\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Call centers provide front-line care and service to patients. This study compared call-answering efficiency and costs between the implementation of an internal, centralized call center (January to July 2019) and previously outsourced call-center services (January to July 2018) for a large urology community practice. Retrospective review of call metrics and cost data was performed. Internal call-center leadership, training, and culture was examined through survey of staff and management. A total of 299,028 calls with an average of 5751 calls per week were answered during the study periods. The Average Speed of Answer (ASA) was 1:42 (min:s) for the outsourced call center and 0:14 for the internal call center (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with 70% of outsourced calls answered under 2 minutes compared with 99% of calls for the internal call center (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The Average Handle Time (AHT) for each outsourced call was 5:32 versus 3:41 for the internal call center (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The total operating expenses were 7.7% lower for the internal call center. Surveys revealed the importance of engaged leadership and staff training with feedback, simplified work algorithms, and expanded clinical roles. We found that internal, centralized call centers may provide a call-answering solution with greater efficiency and lower total operating expense versus an outsourced call center for large surgical practices. A culture that emphasizes continuous improvement and empowers call-center staff with expanded clinical roles may ultimately enhance patient communication and service.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in urology\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"67-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7393684/pdf/RiU022002_0067.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

呼叫中心为患者提供一线护理和服务。本研究比较了大型泌尿科社区实践的内部集中式呼叫中心(2019年1月至7月)和以前外包的呼叫中心服务(2018年1月至7月)之间的呼叫应答效率和成本。对呼叫指标和成本数据进行了回顾性审查。通过对员工和管理人员的调查,考察了内部呼叫中心的领导能力、培训和文化。在研究期间,共有299,028个电话被接听,平均每周5751个电话被接听。外包呼叫中心的平均应答速度(ASA)为1:42 (min:s),内部呼叫中心为0:14 (P < 0.001), 70%的外包呼叫在2分钟内应答,而内部呼叫中心的这一比例为99% (P < 0.001)。每个外包呼叫的平均处理时间(AHT)为5:32,而内部呼叫中心为3:41 (P < 0.001)。内部呼叫中心的总运营费用下降了7.7%。调查显示了敬业的领导和员工培训的重要性,包括反馈、简化的工作算法和扩大的临床角色。我们发现,与大型外科手术的外包呼叫中心相比,内部集中式呼叫中心可以提供效率更高、总运营费用更低的呼叫应答解决方案。一种强调持续改进并赋予呼叫中心工作人员更多临床角色的文化可能最终会提高患者的沟通和服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of a Centralized, Cost-effective Call Center in a Large Urology Community Practice.

Call centers provide front-line care and service to patients. This study compared call-answering efficiency and costs between the implementation of an internal, centralized call center (January to July 2019) and previously outsourced call-center services (January to July 2018) for a large urology community practice. Retrospective review of call metrics and cost data was performed. Internal call-center leadership, training, and culture was examined through survey of staff and management. A total of 299,028 calls with an average of 5751 calls per week were answered during the study periods. The Average Speed of Answer (ASA) was 1:42 (min:s) for the outsourced call center and 0:14 for the internal call center (P < 0.001), with 70% of outsourced calls answered under 2 minutes compared with 99% of calls for the internal call center (P < 0.001). The Average Handle Time (AHT) for each outsourced call was 5:32 versus 3:41 for the internal call center (P < 0.001). The total operating expenses were 7.7% lower for the internal call center. Surveys revealed the importance of engaged leadership and staff training with feedback, simplified work algorithms, and expanded clinical roles. We found that internal, centralized call centers may provide a call-answering solution with greater efficiency and lower total operating expense versus an outsourced call center for large surgical practices. A culture that emphasizes continuous improvement and empowers call-center staff with expanded clinical roles may ultimately enhance patient communication and service.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Obesity and Its Impact on Kidney Stone Formation. Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Stage IB Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor: NYU Case of the Month, April 2020. Management of Low-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Unmet Need. Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses. Benchmarking-We've Come a Long Way.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1