印度农村计划生育量表人际关系质量的验证

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100035
Nicole E. Johns , Anvita Dixit , Mohan Ghule , Shahina Begum , Madhusudana Battala , Gennifer Kully , Jay Silverman , Christine Dehlendorf , Anita Raj , Sarah Averbach
{"title":"印度农村计划生育量表人际关系质量的验证","authors":"Nicole E. Johns ,&nbsp;Anvita Dixit ,&nbsp;Mohan Ghule ,&nbsp;Shahina Begum ,&nbsp;Madhusudana Battala ,&nbsp;Gennifer Kully ,&nbsp;Jay Silverman ,&nbsp;Christine Dehlendorf ,&nbsp;Anita Raj ,&nbsp;Sarah Averbach","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The provision of high-quality family planning (FP) counseling can both enhance clients' experience of care and improve their ability to make and act on their contraceptive decisions. The Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning (IQFP) scale measures FP counseling quality and has been validated in the United States. We aimed to explore whether it remains appropriate for use in a low-/middle-income country (LMIC).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We surveyed 1201 nonsterilized married women ages 18–29 in Maharashtra, India, between September 2018 and June 2019. Respondents rated their FP provider from “poor” (1) to “excellent” (5) across 11 IQFP items. We assessed scale reliability via Cronbach's <em>α</em> test and used exploratory factor analysis to evaluate unidimensionality and regression models of plausibly related outcomes to assess construct validity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five hundred four women (42%) had seen an FP provider within the past year, 491 (97%) of whom answered all items. Mean IQFP score was 2.62 out of 5 (SD 0.94, range 1–5). Scale reliability was high (<em>α</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.97). Exploratory factor analyses support unidimensionality (all factor loadings &gt;<!--> <!-->0.4). A 1-point increase in average IQFP score was associated with nearly double the odds of current modern contraceptive use (adjusted odds ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.73, 95% confidence interval<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.36–2.19).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The IQFP scale shows good reliability and construct validity in this context, and its use in LMIC settings should be broadly considered. A higher IQFP score was associated with greater odds of contraceptive use. The reported FP counseling quality was low, so future public health efforts should aim to increase counseling quality to better meet the needs of women in low-resource settings like rural India. Measurement tools like IQFP can support success evaluation of the quality of care provided by family planning programs.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>The Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning scale is a useful tool in rural India, a different context than the one in which it was developed. Use of the IQFP scale should be considered in other low-/middle-income countries to better measure the quality of family planning care provided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100035"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100035","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning Scale in a rural Indian setting\",\"authors\":\"Nicole E. Johns ,&nbsp;Anvita Dixit ,&nbsp;Mohan Ghule ,&nbsp;Shahina Begum ,&nbsp;Madhusudana Battala ,&nbsp;Gennifer Kully ,&nbsp;Jay Silverman ,&nbsp;Christine Dehlendorf ,&nbsp;Anita Raj ,&nbsp;Sarah Averbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The provision of high-quality family planning (FP) counseling can both enhance clients' experience of care and improve their ability to make and act on their contraceptive decisions. The Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning (IQFP) scale measures FP counseling quality and has been validated in the United States. We aimed to explore whether it remains appropriate for use in a low-/middle-income country (LMIC).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We surveyed 1201 nonsterilized married women ages 18–29 in Maharashtra, India, between September 2018 and June 2019. Respondents rated their FP provider from “poor” (1) to “excellent” (5) across 11 IQFP items. We assessed scale reliability via Cronbach's <em>α</em> test and used exploratory factor analysis to evaluate unidimensionality and regression models of plausibly related outcomes to assess construct validity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five hundred four women (42%) had seen an FP provider within the past year, 491 (97%) of whom answered all items. Mean IQFP score was 2.62 out of 5 (SD 0.94, range 1–5). Scale reliability was high (<em>α</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.97). Exploratory factor analyses support unidimensionality (all factor loadings &gt;<!--> <!-->0.4). A 1-point increase in average IQFP score was associated with nearly double the odds of current modern contraceptive use (adjusted odds ratio<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.73, 95% confidence interval<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.36–2.19).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The IQFP scale shows good reliability and construct validity in this context, and its use in LMIC settings should be broadly considered. A higher IQFP score was associated with greater odds of contraceptive use. The reported FP counseling quality was low, so future public health efforts should aim to increase counseling quality to better meet the needs of women in low-resource settings like rural India. Measurement tools like IQFP can support success evaluation of the quality of care provided by family planning programs.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>The Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning scale is a useful tool in rural India, a different context than the one in which it was developed. Use of the IQFP scale should be considered in other low-/middle-income countries to better measure the quality of family planning care provided.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100035\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的提供高质量的计划生育咨询服务,既能提高患者的护理体验,又能提高患者的避孕决策能力和行动能力。计划生育人际质量(IQFP)量表衡量计划生育咨询质量,并已在美国得到验证。我们的目的是探讨它是否仍然适用于中低收入国家(LMIC)。我们在2018年9月至2019年6月期间调查了印度马哈拉施特拉邦1201名18-29岁未绝育的已婚女性。受访者在11个IQFP项目中将他们的计划生育提供者评为“差”(1)到“优秀”(5)。我们通过Cronbach's α检验评估量表信度,并使用探索性因子分析评估单维性,并使用回归模型评估似然相关结果的结构效度。结果在过去一年中,有5400名妇女(42%)就诊过计划生育服务提供者,其中491名(97%)回答了所有问题。平均IQFP得分为2.62 (SD 0.94,范围1-5)。量表信度高(α = 0.97)。探索性因子分析支持单维度(所有因子负载);0.4)。平均IQFP得分每增加1分,使用现代避孕药具的几率就增加近一倍(调整后的优势比= 1.73,95%可信区间= 1.36-2.19)。结论IQFP量表具有良好的信度和结构效度,应广泛考虑其在低mic环境中的应用。IQFP得分越高,使用避孕措施的几率越大。报告的计划生育咨询质量较低,因此未来的公共卫生工作应致力于提高咨询质量,以更好地满足印度农村等资源匮乏地区妇女的需求。像IQFP这样的测量工具可以支持对计划生育项目提供的护理质量的成功评估。计划生育人际关系质量量表在印度农村是一个有用的工具,这与它开发的背景不同。其他低收入/中等收入国家应考虑使用IQFP量表,以便更好地衡量所提供的计划生育护理的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning Scale in a rural Indian setting

Objectives

The provision of high-quality family planning (FP) counseling can both enhance clients' experience of care and improve their ability to make and act on their contraceptive decisions. The Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning (IQFP) scale measures FP counseling quality and has been validated in the United States. We aimed to explore whether it remains appropriate for use in a low-/middle-income country (LMIC).

Study design

We surveyed 1201 nonsterilized married women ages 18–29 in Maharashtra, India, between September 2018 and June 2019. Respondents rated their FP provider from “poor” (1) to “excellent” (5) across 11 IQFP items. We assessed scale reliability via Cronbach's α test and used exploratory factor analysis to evaluate unidimensionality and regression models of plausibly related outcomes to assess construct validity.

Results

Five hundred four women (42%) had seen an FP provider within the past year, 491 (97%) of whom answered all items. Mean IQFP score was 2.62 out of 5 (SD 0.94, range 1–5). Scale reliability was high (α = 0.97). Exploratory factor analyses support unidimensionality (all factor loadings > 0.4). A 1-point increase in average IQFP score was associated with nearly double the odds of current modern contraceptive use (adjusted odds ratio = 1.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.36–2.19).

Conclusions

The IQFP scale shows good reliability and construct validity in this context, and its use in LMIC settings should be broadly considered. A higher IQFP score was associated with greater odds of contraceptive use. The reported FP counseling quality was low, so future public health efforts should aim to increase counseling quality to better meet the needs of women in low-resource settings like rural India. Measurement tools like IQFP can support success evaluation of the quality of care provided by family planning programs.

Implications

The Interpersonal Quality of Family Planning scale is a useful tool in rural India, a different context than the one in which it was developed. Use of the IQFP scale should be considered in other low-/middle-income countries to better measure the quality of family planning care provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1