Michael Z Liao, Marloes Berkhout, Hans Prenen, Sandeep Dutta, Vijay V Upreti
{"title":"帕尼珠单抗在癌症患者中的剂量方案依据:是否基于体重。","authors":"Michael Z Liao, Marloes Berkhout, Hans Prenen, Sandeep Dutta, Vijay V Upreti","doi":"10.2147/CPAA.S262949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Body weight can affect exposure, safety and efficacy of antibody-based therapies; sometimes these effects may not be clinically relevant. Panitumumab is approved for wild-type <i>RAS</i> metastatic colorectal cancer, using a body weight-based dosing regimen. Recently, a report cited fixed-dose usage of panitumumab, rather than approved body weight-based dosing. The current work evaluates optimal dosing regimen scientifically based on clinical data, modeling and simulation. Herein, we assessed the effect of fixed and body weight-based dosing on panitumumab pharmacokinetics to determine which approach resulted in the least interpatient pharmacokinetic variability.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the Vectibix program, 352 patients enrolled in three studies were evaluated; they had received panitumumab (body weight-based dose: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and had pharmacokinetic (maximum serum [C<sub>max]</sub> and trough [C<sub>min</sub>] concentrations) and body weight data available. Additionally, concentration-time profiles at fixed (480 mg) and body weight-based doses (6 mg/kg) were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics model developed from 1200 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After administration of panitumumab 6 mg/kg, C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>min</sub> increased with increasing body weight; the mean C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>min</sub> for patients weighing <65 kg (lower quartile) were 23% and 30% lower, respectively, than for those weighing >88 kg (upper quartile). The simulated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) data also indicated that overall panitumumab exposure increased with increasing body weight for the body weight-based regimen. When AUC was simulated for a fixed dose (480 mg), the opposite effect was observed. Over the range of body weights, interpatient variability in simulated AUC was lower for the weight-based dose (29%) than for the fixed dose (34%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results demonstrate that the weight-based dose (6 mg/kg) reduced variability in panitumumab exposure across the range of body weights compared with the fixed-dose approach, indicating that a body weight-based approach is the recommended patient dosing strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10406,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","volume":"12 ","pages":"109-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S262949","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose Regimen Rationale for Panitumumab in Cancer Patients: To Be Based on Body Weight or Not.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Z Liao, Marloes Berkhout, Hans Prenen, Sandeep Dutta, Vijay V Upreti\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CPAA.S262949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Body weight can affect exposure, safety and efficacy of antibody-based therapies; sometimes these effects may not be clinically relevant. Panitumumab is approved for wild-type <i>RAS</i> metastatic colorectal cancer, using a body weight-based dosing regimen. Recently, a report cited fixed-dose usage of panitumumab, rather than approved body weight-based dosing. The current work evaluates optimal dosing regimen scientifically based on clinical data, modeling and simulation. Herein, we assessed the effect of fixed and body weight-based dosing on panitumumab pharmacokinetics to determine which approach resulted in the least interpatient pharmacokinetic variability.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From the Vectibix program, 352 patients enrolled in three studies were evaluated; they had received panitumumab (body weight-based dose: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and had pharmacokinetic (maximum serum [C<sub>max]</sub> and trough [C<sub>min</sub>] concentrations) and body weight data available. Additionally, concentration-time profiles at fixed (480 mg) and body weight-based doses (6 mg/kg) were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics model developed from 1200 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After administration of panitumumab 6 mg/kg, C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>min</sub> increased with increasing body weight; the mean C<sub>max</sub> and C<sub>min</sub> for patients weighing <65 kg (lower quartile) were 23% and 30% lower, respectively, than for those weighing >88 kg (upper quartile). The simulated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) data also indicated that overall panitumumab exposure increased with increasing body weight for the body weight-based regimen. When AUC was simulated for a fixed dose (480 mg), the opposite effect was observed. Over the range of body weights, interpatient variability in simulated AUC was lower for the weight-based dose (29%) than for the fixed dose (34%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results demonstrate that the weight-based dose (6 mg/kg) reduced variability in panitumumab exposure across the range of body weights compared with the fixed-dose approach, indicating that a body weight-based approach is the recommended patient dosing strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"109-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S262949\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S262949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S262949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dose Regimen Rationale for Panitumumab in Cancer Patients: To Be Based on Body Weight or Not.
Introduction: Body weight can affect exposure, safety and efficacy of antibody-based therapies; sometimes these effects may not be clinically relevant. Panitumumab is approved for wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer, using a body weight-based dosing regimen. Recently, a report cited fixed-dose usage of panitumumab, rather than approved body weight-based dosing. The current work evaluates optimal dosing regimen scientifically based on clinical data, modeling and simulation. Herein, we assessed the effect of fixed and body weight-based dosing on panitumumab pharmacokinetics to determine which approach resulted in the least interpatient pharmacokinetic variability.
Patients and methods: From the Vectibix program, 352 patients enrolled in three studies were evaluated; they had received panitumumab (body weight-based dose: 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and had pharmacokinetic (maximum serum [Cmax] and trough [Cmin] concentrations) and body weight data available. Additionally, concentration-time profiles at fixed (480 mg) and body weight-based doses (6 mg/kg) were simulated using a population pharmacokinetics model developed from 1200 patients.
Results: After administration of panitumumab 6 mg/kg, Cmax and Cmin increased with increasing body weight; the mean Cmax and Cmin for patients weighing <65 kg (lower quartile) were 23% and 30% lower, respectively, than for those weighing >88 kg (upper quartile). The simulated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) data also indicated that overall panitumumab exposure increased with increasing body weight for the body weight-based regimen. When AUC was simulated for a fixed dose (480 mg), the opposite effect was observed. Over the range of body weights, interpatient variability in simulated AUC was lower for the weight-based dose (29%) than for the fixed dose (34%).
Conclusion: Results demonstrate that the weight-based dose (6 mg/kg) reduced variability in panitumumab exposure across the range of body weights compared with the fixed-dose approach, indicating that a body weight-based approach is the recommended patient dosing strategy.