对SBAR量表(KA-SBAR)知识和态度的初步心理测量。

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2020-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-21 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-D-19-00058
Denise Cooper, Patricia C Clark
{"title":"对SBAR量表(KA-SBAR)知识和态度的初步心理测量。","authors":"Denise Cooper,&nbsp;Patricia C Clark","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-D-19-00058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When measuring new practice approaches for improving patient safety in the clinical setting, researchers need instruments with evidence of reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this analysis was to examine the reliability and validity of an instrument to assess knowledge and attitudes toward communication using situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR; KA-SBAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This psychometric analysis was conducted with data from an interprofessional simulation-based learning experience with doctor of nursing practice students (<i>n</i> = 19) and physical therapy students (<i>n</i> = 52). Internal consistency reliability and construct validity tests including factor analysis for the KA-SBAR were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The KA-SBAR instrument had adequate internal consistency reliability and evidence of construct validity, including identification of two factors that explained 70% of the instrument's variance. However, there may be a ceiling effect of scores, making it difficult to show change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The KA-SBAR instrument may be useful in assessing clinicians' perceptions of SBAR communication in education and practice settings.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>When selecting data collection measures, nurses need to carefully consider the purpose of the measure and evidence of the instrument's reliability and validity. Educators need to consider the clinical expertise of the students in designing challenging simulations to advance learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":"13 2","pages":"120-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary Psychometrics of the Knowledge and Attitudes Toward SBAR Instrument (KA-SBAR).\",\"authors\":\"Denise Cooper,&nbsp;Patricia C Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JDNP-D-19-00058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When measuring new practice approaches for improving patient safety in the clinical setting, researchers need instruments with evidence of reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this analysis was to examine the reliability and validity of an instrument to assess knowledge and attitudes toward communication using situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR; KA-SBAR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This psychometric analysis was conducted with data from an interprofessional simulation-based learning experience with doctor of nursing practice students (<i>n</i> = 19) and physical therapy students (<i>n</i> = 52). Internal consistency reliability and construct validity tests including factor analysis for the KA-SBAR were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The KA-SBAR instrument had adequate internal consistency reliability and evidence of construct validity, including identification of two factors that explained 70% of the instrument's variance. However, there may be a ceiling effect of scores, making it difficult to show change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The KA-SBAR instrument may be useful in assessing clinicians' perceptions of SBAR communication in education and practice settings.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>When selecting data collection measures, nurses need to carefully consider the purpose of the measure and evidence of the instrument's reliability and validity. Educators need to consider the clinical expertise of the students in designing challenging simulations to advance learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"120-124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-19-00058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-19-00058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:当在临床环境中测量新的实践方法以改善患者安全时,研究人员需要具有可靠性和有效性证据的仪器。目的:本分析的目的是检验使用情境-背景-评估-建议(SBAR)评估沟通知识和态度的工具的信度和效度;KA-SBAR)。方法:采用基于跨专业模拟学习经验的数据进行心理测量分析,这些数据来自护理实习博士学生(n = 19)和物理治疗专业学生(n = 52)。对KA-SBAR进行了内部一致性、信度和结构效度检验,包括因子分析。结果:KA-SBAR量表具有足够的内部一致性信度和结构效度证据,包括两个因素的识别,解释了量表方差的70%。然而,可能存在分数上限效应,因此很难显示变化。结论:KA-SBAR仪器可能有助于评估临床医生在教育和实践环境中对SBAR沟通的看法。对护理的启示:在选择数据收集措施时,护士需要仔细考虑措施的目的和工具的信度和效度的证据。在设计具有挑战性的模拟实验以促进学习时,教育者需要考虑学生的临床专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preliminary Psychometrics of the Knowledge and Attitudes Toward SBAR Instrument (KA-SBAR).

Background: When measuring new practice approaches for improving patient safety in the clinical setting, researchers need instruments with evidence of reliability and validity.

Objective: The purpose of this analysis was to examine the reliability and validity of an instrument to assess knowledge and attitudes toward communication using situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR; KA-SBAR).

Methods: This psychometric analysis was conducted with data from an interprofessional simulation-based learning experience with doctor of nursing practice students (n = 19) and physical therapy students (n = 52). Internal consistency reliability and construct validity tests including factor analysis for the KA-SBAR were conducted.

Results: The KA-SBAR instrument had adequate internal consistency reliability and evidence of construct validity, including identification of two factors that explained 70% of the instrument's variance. However, there may be a ceiling effect of scores, making it difficult to show change.

Conclusions: The KA-SBAR instrument may be useful in assessing clinicians' perceptions of SBAR communication in education and practice settings.

Implications for nursing: When selecting data collection measures, nurses need to carefully consider the purpose of the measure and evidence of the instrument's reliability and validity. Educators need to consider the clinical expertise of the students in designing challenging simulations to advance learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of a Virtual Seminar Series for Doctor of Nursing Students to Promote Advanced Nursing Practice. Effect of Cold Vapor Application on Postoperative Sore Throat, Dry Throat, and Difficulty Swallowing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Improving Person-Centered Depression Screening and Care in an Urban Faith-Based Community. Interactive Nursing Education to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding. Increasing Effective Primary Care Screenings in the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Health Community Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1