背景原型:根据原型类型、利益相关者群体和问题类型探索利益相关者的反馈。

IF 2.3 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Research in Engineering Design Pub Date : 2019-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-18 DOI:10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5
Michael Deininger, Shanna R Daly, Jennifer C Lee, Colleen M Seifert, Kathleen H Sienko
{"title":"背景原型:根据原型类型、利益相关者群体和问题类型探索利益相关者的反馈。","authors":"Michael Deininger,&nbsp;Shanna R Daly,&nbsp;Jennifer C Lee,&nbsp;Colleen M Seifert,&nbsp;Kathleen H Sienko","doi":"10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Engineering designers frequently use prototypes to gather input from stakeholders. Design guidelines recommend the use of quick and simple prototypes early and often in a design process. However, the type and quality of a prototype can influence how stakeholders perceive a new design concept and can therefore impact their responses. Additionally, different levels of experience, expertise, and preparedness for providing input to designers may lead stakeholders from different geographical or cultural settings to provide different responses, making the format of a prototype even more influential. Although design practitioners are known to intentionally align their prototyping approach with the specific design question to be answered, it is unclear the extent to which prototyping approaches should vary based on the stakeholders, context, and setting of a design project. To investigate how the format and quality of prototypes influence stakeholders' responses, we conducted a field study with various medical professionals in Ghana. We presented prototypes for a medical device in different formats to stakeholders and collected responses to the design through semi-structured interviews. We found that professional expertise, prototype format, and question type influenced the types of responses that stakeholders provided. These findings suggest that designers seeking input from stakeholders on new concepts should consider context-specific prototyping strategies, especially when designing at distance and across cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":49629,"journal":{"name":"Research in Engineering Design","volume":"30 4","pages":"453-471"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prototyping for context: exploring stakeholder feedback based on prototype type, stakeholder group and question type.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Deininger,&nbsp;Shanna R Daly,&nbsp;Jennifer C Lee,&nbsp;Colleen M Seifert,&nbsp;Kathleen H Sienko\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Engineering designers frequently use prototypes to gather input from stakeholders. Design guidelines recommend the use of quick and simple prototypes early and often in a design process. However, the type and quality of a prototype can influence how stakeholders perceive a new design concept and can therefore impact their responses. Additionally, different levels of experience, expertise, and preparedness for providing input to designers may lead stakeholders from different geographical or cultural settings to provide different responses, making the format of a prototype even more influential. Although design practitioners are known to intentionally align their prototyping approach with the specific design question to be answered, it is unclear the extent to which prototyping approaches should vary based on the stakeholders, context, and setting of a design project. To investigate how the format and quality of prototypes influence stakeholders' responses, we conducted a field study with various medical professionals in Ghana. We presented prototypes for a medical device in different formats to stakeholders and collected responses to the design through semi-structured interviews. We found that professional expertise, prototype format, and question type influenced the types of responses that stakeholders provided. These findings suggest that designers seeking input from stakeholders on new concepts should consider context-specific prototyping strategies, especially when designing at distance and across cultures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Engineering Design\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"453-471\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Engineering Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-019-00317-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

工程设计师经常使用原型从涉众那里收集信息。设计指南建议在设计过程中尽早并经常使用快速和简单的原型。然而,原型的类型和质量会影响利益相关者对新设计概念的看法,从而影响他们的反应。此外,不同层次的经验、专业知识和为设计师提供输入的准备可能会导致来自不同地理或文化背景的利益相关者提供不同的回应,从而使原型的格式更具影响力。尽管众所周知,设计实践者有意地将他们的原型方法与要回答的特定设计问题结合起来,但原型方法应该根据涉众、环境和设计项目的设置而变化的程度是不清楚的。为了调查原型的格式和质量如何影响利益相关者的反应,我们对加纳的各种医疗专业人员进行了实地研究。我们向利益相关者展示了不同格式的医疗设备原型,并通过半结构化访谈收集了对设计的回应。我们发现专业知识、原型格式和问题类型会影响利益相关者提供的回答类型。这些发现表明,设计师在寻求利益相关者对新概念的投入时,应该考虑情境特定的原型策略,尤其是在远距离和跨文化设计时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prototyping for context: exploring stakeholder feedback based on prototype type, stakeholder group and question type.

Engineering designers frequently use prototypes to gather input from stakeholders. Design guidelines recommend the use of quick and simple prototypes early and often in a design process. However, the type and quality of a prototype can influence how stakeholders perceive a new design concept and can therefore impact their responses. Additionally, different levels of experience, expertise, and preparedness for providing input to designers may lead stakeholders from different geographical or cultural settings to provide different responses, making the format of a prototype even more influential. Although design practitioners are known to intentionally align their prototyping approach with the specific design question to be answered, it is unclear the extent to which prototyping approaches should vary based on the stakeholders, context, and setting of a design project. To investigate how the format and quality of prototypes influence stakeholders' responses, we conducted a field study with various medical professionals in Ghana. We presented prototypes for a medical device in different formats to stakeholders and collected responses to the design through semi-structured interviews. We found that professional expertise, prototype format, and question type influenced the types of responses that stakeholders provided. These findings suggest that designers seeking input from stakeholders on new concepts should consider context-specific prototyping strategies, especially when designing at distance and across cultures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Engineering Design
Research in Engineering Design 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
审稿时长
18 months
期刊介绍: Research in Engineering Design is an international journal that publishes research papers on design theory and methodology in all fields of engineering, focussing on mechanical, civil, architectural, and manufacturing engineering. The journal is designed for professionals in academia, industry and government interested in research issues relevant to design practice. Papers emphasize underlying principles of engineering design and discipline-oriented research where results are of interest or extendible to other engineering domains. General areas of interest include theories of design, foundations of design environments, representations and languages, models of design processes, and integration of design and manufacturing. Representative topics include functional representation, feature-based design, shape grammars, process design, redesign, product data base models, and empirical studies. The journal also publishes state-of-the-art review articles.
期刊最新文献
The effect of targeting both quantitative and qualitative objectives in generative design tools on the design outcomes The impacts of non-perceptual cognition (NPC) on design process and ideation A new method to prioritize the QFDs’ engineering characteristics inspired by the Law of  Comparative Judgment Fostering self-efficacy through usability and emotional product design? An explorative study Evaluating the effectiveness of functional decomposition in early-stage design: development and application of problem space exploration metrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1