左非诺普利与雷米普利在急性心肌梗死合并收缩功能障碍早期的对比:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1177/1470320320946530
Xiaoyang Liu, Xiaoling Xu, Yi Chu, Yingang Ren, Liping Wang
{"title":"左非诺普利与雷米普利在急性心肌梗死合并收缩功能障碍早期的对比:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Xiaoyang Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoling Xu,&nbsp;Yi Chu,&nbsp;Yingang Ren,&nbsp;Liping Wang","doi":"10.1177/1470320320946530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prognostic benefits of zofenopril over ramipril in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction have been reported by the SMILE study, but these benefits have not been tested in clinical practice in the Chinese population. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of zofenopril plus aspirin against ramipril plus aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction received 30 mg zofenopril (ZF cohort, <i>N</i>=191) or 5 mg ramipril (RP cohort, <i>N</i>=256) b.i.d. plus 100 mg aspirin/day. Data regarding hospitalisation for cardiovascular disease, non-cardiovascular events and mortality were collected and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 1 year of treatment, 47 (25%) patients in the ZF cohort and 97 (40%) patients in the RP cohort were hospitalised due to cardiovascular disease (<i>p</i>=0.002), and three (2%) patients in the ZF cohort and 14 (6%) patients in the RP cohort died (<i>p</i>=0.043). Lower incidences of dry cough (<i>p</i>=0.001) and anaemia (<i>p</i>=0.049) were reported in the ZF cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study recommends zofenopril with 100 mg aspirin for a longer period in patients with acute myocardial infarction with systolic dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":17330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1470320320946530","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zofenopril versus ramipril in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction with systolic dysfunction: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyang Liu,&nbsp;Xiaoling Xu,&nbsp;Yi Chu,&nbsp;Yingang Ren,&nbsp;Liping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1470320320946530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prognostic benefits of zofenopril over ramipril in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction have been reported by the SMILE study, but these benefits have not been tested in clinical practice in the Chinese population. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of zofenopril plus aspirin against ramipril plus aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction received 30 mg zofenopril (ZF cohort, <i>N</i>=191) or 5 mg ramipril (RP cohort, <i>N</i>=256) b.i.d. plus 100 mg aspirin/day. Data regarding hospitalisation for cardiovascular disease, non-cardiovascular events and mortality were collected and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During 1 year of treatment, 47 (25%) patients in the ZF cohort and 97 (40%) patients in the RP cohort were hospitalised due to cardiovascular disease (<i>p</i>=0.002), and three (2%) patients in the ZF cohort and 14 (6%) patients in the RP cohort died (<i>p</i>=0.043). Lower incidences of dry cough (<i>p</i>=0.001) and anaemia (<i>p</i>=0.049) were reported in the ZF cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study recommends zofenopril with 100 mg aspirin for a longer period in patients with acute myocardial infarction with systolic dysfunction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1470320320946530\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320320946530\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1470320320946530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

SMILE研究报告了急性心肌梗死早期佐非诺普利优于雷米普利的预后益处,但这些益处尚未在中国人群的临床实践中进行测试。本研究的目的是比较急性心肌梗死患者佐非诺普利加阿司匹林与雷米普利加阿司匹林的有效性和安全性。方法:急性心肌梗死早期患者每日服用唑非诺普利30 mg (ZF组,N=191)或雷米普利5 mg (RP组,N=256),外加阿司匹林100 mg /d。收集和分析了有关心血管疾病住院、非心血管事件和死亡率的数据。结果:1年治疗期间,ZF组47例(25%)和RP组97例(40%)患者因心血管疾病住院(p=0.002), ZF组3例(2%)和RP组14例(6%)患者死亡(p=0.043)。在ZF队列中,干咳(p=0.001)和贫血(p=0.049)的发生率较低。结论:该研究建议急性心肌梗死合并收缩功能障碍患者长期服用唑非普利与100mg阿司匹林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zofenopril versus ramipril in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction with systolic dysfunction: A retrospective study.

Introduction: Prognostic benefits of zofenopril over ramipril in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction have been reported by the SMILE study, but these benefits have not been tested in clinical practice in the Chinese population. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of zofenopril plus aspirin against ramipril plus aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Methods: Patients in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction received 30 mg zofenopril (ZF cohort, N=191) or 5 mg ramipril (RP cohort, N=256) b.i.d. plus 100 mg aspirin/day. Data regarding hospitalisation for cardiovascular disease, non-cardiovascular events and mortality were collected and analysed.

Results: During 1 year of treatment, 47 (25%) patients in the ZF cohort and 97 (40%) patients in the RP cohort were hospitalised due to cardiovascular disease (p=0.002), and three (2%) patients in the ZF cohort and 14 (6%) patients in the RP cohort died (p=0.043). Lower incidences of dry cough (p=0.001) and anaemia (p=0.049) were reported in the ZF cohort.

Conclusions: The study recommends zofenopril with 100 mg aspirin for a longer period in patients with acute myocardial infarction with systolic dysfunction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JRAAS is a peer-reviewed, open access journal, serving as a resource for biomedical professionals, primarily with an active interest in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in humans and other mammals. It publishes original research and reviews on the normal and abnormal function of this system and its pharmacology and therapeutics, mostly in a cardiovascular context but including research in all areas where this system is present, including the brain, lungs and gastro-intestinal tract.
期刊最新文献
Relationship between Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism and the Risk of COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis. Genetic Variants Associated with High Susceptibility of Premature Ischemic Stroke. Timing Matters: Effects of Early and Late Estrogen Replacement Therapy on Glucose Metabolism and Vascular Reactivity in Ovariectomized Aged Wistar Rats. Renin Trajectories and Outcome in Stable Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) on Contemporary Therapy: A Monocentric Study from an Austrian Tertiary Hospital Outpatient Clinic. New Viral Diseases and New Possible Remedies by Means of the Pharmacology of the Renin-Angiotensin System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1