冲击波疗法对增生性烧伤疤痕的影响:随机对照试验。

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2020-12-02 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2059513120975624
Peter Moortgat, Mieke Anthonissen, Ulrike Van Daele, Tine Vanhullebusch, Koen Maertens, Lieve De Cuyper, Cynthia Lafaire, Jill Meirte
{"title":"冲击波疗法对增生性烧伤疤痕的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Peter Moortgat, Mieke Anthonissen, Ulrike Van Daele, Tine Vanhullebusch, Koen Maertens, Lieve De Cuyper, Cynthia Lafaire, Jill Meirte","doi":"10.1177/2059513120975624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of hypertrophic burn scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a new non-invasive type of mechanotherapy to treat wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the objective and subjective scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early remodelling phase.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Evaluations included the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for scar quality, tri-stimulus colorimetry for redness, tewametry for trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and cutometry for elasticity. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group, and were tested at baseline, after one, three and six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results for 20 patients in each group after six months are presented. The objective assessments showed a statistically significant effect of ESWT compared with placebo on elasticity (<i>P</i> = 0.011, η2<i>P</i>=0.107) but revealed no significant effects on redness and TEWL. Results of the clinical assessments showed no significant interactions between intervention and time for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of hypertrophic scars, more specifically to improve elasticity when the treatment was already started in the first three months after wound closure.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>Pathological scarring is a common problem after a burn injury. A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of these scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy of these interventions has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a relatively new non-invasive therapy to treat both wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early phase of healing.The scars were subjectively assessed for scar quality by the patient and an observer using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Objective assessments included measurements to assess redness, water loss and elasticity. Forty patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group (the device simulated the sound of an ESWT treatment but no real shocks were applied), and were tested at four timepoints up to six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks.The objective assessments showed a significant improvement of elasticity in the intervention group when compared with placebo but revealed no significant effects on redness and water loss. Results of the clinical assessments showed no differences between the groups for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores.ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of pathological scars more specifically to improve elasticity in the early phase of healing.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/ca/10.1177_2059513120975624.PMC7716075.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Moortgat, Mieke Anthonissen, Ulrike Van Daele, Tine Vanhullebusch, Koen Maertens, Lieve De Cuyper, Cynthia Lafaire, Jill Meirte\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2059513120975624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of hypertrophic burn scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a new non-invasive type of mechanotherapy to treat wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the objective and subjective scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early remodelling phase.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Evaluations included the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for scar quality, tri-stimulus colorimetry for redness, tewametry for trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and cutometry for elasticity. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group, and were tested at baseline, after one, three and six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results for 20 patients in each group after six months are presented. The objective assessments showed a statistically significant effect of ESWT compared with placebo on elasticity (<i>P</i> = 0.011, η2<i>P</i>=0.107) but revealed no significant effects on redness and TEWL. Results of the clinical assessments showed no significant interactions between intervention and time for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of hypertrophic scars, more specifically to improve elasticity when the treatment was already started in the first three months after wound closure.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>Pathological scarring is a common problem after a burn injury. A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of these scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy of these interventions has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a relatively new non-invasive therapy to treat both wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early phase of healing.The scars were subjectively assessed for scar quality by the patient and an observer using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Objective assessments included measurements to assess redness, water loss and elasticity. Forty patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group (the device simulated the sound of an ESWT treatment but no real shocks were applied), and were tested at four timepoints up to six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks.The objective assessments showed a significant improvement of elasticity in the intervention group when compared with placebo but revealed no significant effects on redness and water loss. Results of the clinical assessments showed no differences between the groups for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores.ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of pathological scars more specifically to improve elasticity in the early phase of healing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/ca/10.1177_2059513120975624.PMC7716075.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120975624\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120975624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:针对增生性烧伤疤痕的治疗,人们提出了多种非侵入性治疗方法。遗憾的是,所报道的疗效并不一致,尤其是在伤口愈合后的头三个月,疤痕皮肤的脆弱性限制了治疗方案的选择。体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)是一种治疗伤口和疤痕的新型非侵入性机械疗法。本研究旨在探讨 ESWT 在早期重塑阶段对烧伤疤痕的客观和主观影响:评估包括患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)(用于评估疤痕质量)、三刺激比色法(用于评估发红程度)、透表皮失水率(TEWL)测量法(Tewametry)和切口弹性测量法(Cutometry)。患者被随机分配到两组中的一组,即低能量干预组或安慰剂对照组,并在基线、1 个月、3 个月和 6 个月后接受测试。所有患者都接受了压力衣、硅胶和润肤剂治疗。两组患者均接受 ESWT 治疗(实际治疗或安慰剂治疗),每周一次,为期 10 周:结果:每组 20 名患者在 6 个月后的治疗结果如下。客观评估显示,与安慰剂相比,ESWT 对弹性的影响具有统计学意义(P = 0.011,η2P = 0.107),但对发红和 TEWL 没有显著影响。临床评估结果表明,在POSAS患者和观察者评分方面,干预与时间之间没有明显的交互作用:结论:ESWT 可以为增生性疤痕的无创治疗带来附加值,尤其是在伤口闭合后的前三个月开始治疗时,可以改善疤痕的弹性。为治疗这些疤痕,人们提出了各种各样的非侵入性治疗方法。遗憾的是,这些治疗方法的疗效并不一致,尤其是在伤口闭合后的头三个月,疤痕皮肤的脆弱性限制了治疗方案的选择。体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)是一种相对较新的治疗伤口和疤痕的非侵入性疗法。本研究旨在探讨 ESWT 在烧伤疤痕愈合早期阶段对疤痕的相关影响。疤痕质量由患者和观察者使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表 (POSAS) 进行主观评估。客观评估包括对发红、失水和弹性的测量。40 名患者被随机分配到两组中的一组,即低能量干预组或安慰剂对照组(该装置模拟了 ESWT 治疗的声音,但没有施加真正的冲击),并在四个时间点进行测试,测试时间长达六个月。所有患者都接受了压力衣、硅胶和润肤剂治疗。客观评估结果显示,与安慰剂相比,干预组的皮肤弹性明显改善,但对皮肤发红和失水没有明显影响。临床评估结果表明,在 POSAS 患者评分和观察者评分方面,干预组之间没有差异。ESWT 可以为病理性疤痕的非侵入性治疗带来附加值,特别是在愈合的早期阶段改善弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of shock wave therapy applied on hypertrophic burn scars: a randomised controlled trial.

Introduction: A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of hypertrophic burn scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a new non-invasive type of mechanotherapy to treat wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the objective and subjective scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early remodelling phase.

Material and methods: Evaluations included the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) for scar quality, tri-stimulus colorimetry for redness, tewametry for trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) and cutometry for elasticity. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group, and were tested at baseline, after one, three and six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks.

Results: Results for 20 patients in each group after six months are presented. The objective assessments showed a statistically significant effect of ESWT compared with placebo on elasticity (P = 0.011, η2P=0.107) but revealed no significant effects on redness and TEWL. Results of the clinical assessments showed no significant interactions between intervention and time for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores.

Conclusion: ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of hypertrophic scars, more specifically to improve elasticity when the treatment was already started in the first three months after wound closure.

Lay summary: Pathological scarring is a common problem after a burn injury. A wide variety of non-invasive treatments has been proposed for the management of these scars. Unfortunately, the reported efficacy of these interventions has not been consistent, and especially in the first three months after wound closure, fragility of the scarred skin limits the treatment options. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a relatively new non-invasive therapy to treat both wounds and scars. The aim of the present study was to examine the scar-related effects of ESWT on burn scars in the early phase of healing.The scars were subjectively assessed for scar quality by the patient and an observer using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Objective assessments included measurements to assess redness, water loss and elasticity. Forty patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups, the low-energy intervention group or the placebo control group (the device simulated the sound of an ESWT treatment but no real shocks were applied), and were tested at four timepoints up to six months. All patients were treated with pressure garments, silicone and moisturisers. Both groups received the ESWT treatment (real or placebo) once a week for 10 weeks.The objective assessments showed a significant improvement of elasticity in the intervention group when compared with placebo but revealed no significant effects on redness and water loss. Results of the clinical assessments showed no differences between the groups for the POSAS Patient and Observer scores.ESWT can give added value to the non-invasive treatment of pathological scars more specifically to improve elasticity in the early phase of healing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1