通过显色和一期试验评估延长半衰期凝血因子VIII、FC融合蛋白在沙特血友病A患者中的表现

Q3 Medicine Advances in Hematology Pub Date : 2020-09-09 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/8768074
Tarek M Owaidah, Hazzaa A Alzahrani, Nouf S Al-Numair, Abdulmjeed O Alnosair, Amelita M Aguilos, Mahasen Saleh
{"title":"通过显色和一期试验评估延长半衰期凝血因子VIII、FC融合蛋白在沙特血友病A患者中的表现","authors":"Tarek M Owaidah,&nbsp;Hazzaa A Alzahrani,&nbsp;Nouf S Al-Numair,&nbsp;Abdulmjeed O Alnosair,&nbsp;Amelita M Aguilos,&nbsp;Mahasen Saleh","doi":"10.1155/2020/8768074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The one-stage assay is the most common method to measure factor VIII activity (FVIII : C) in hemophilia A patients. The chromogenic assay is another two-stage test involving purified coagulation factors followed by factor Xa-specific chromogenic substrate.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the discrepancy and correlation between the chromogenic and one-stage assays in measuring FVIII : C levels in hemophilia patients receiving Extended Half-Life Elocta® as a recombinant extended half-life coagulation factor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a study comparing the measurements of FVIII : C levels by the chromogenic versus the one-stage assays at different drug levels. Data of FVIII : C levels, dosage, and the time interval from administration to measurement were retrieved from the hospital records. The correlation, mean differences, and discrepancy between the two assays were calculated. The linear regression analysis was used to predict the time interval till reaching 1% FVIII : C.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients with 56 samples were included in the study. Of them, 13 patients were receiving Elocta® as a prophylactic, while one was receiving Elocta® on demand. One-third of these samples showed a discrepancy between the chromogenic and one-stage assays. The two assays were well correlated. Mean differences were significant at the individual and the time interval level. The time since the last Elocta® injection could significantly predict FVIII : C levels (<i>β</i> = 0.366, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggested a significant difference between both methods; the FVIII : C levels measured by the one-stage assay were less than those estimated by the chromogenic assay. However, the measurements of FVIII levels by the two assays were well correlated but discrepant in one-third of the samples. The levels of FVIII : C reach 1% after 5.4 days since the last Elocta® administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":7325,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Hematology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"8768074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/8768074","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Performance of Extended Half-Life Coagulation Factor VIII, FC Fusion Protein by Using Chromogenic and One-Stage Assays in Saudi Hemophilia A Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Tarek M Owaidah,&nbsp;Hazzaa A Alzahrani,&nbsp;Nouf S Al-Numair,&nbsp;Abdulmjeed O Alnosair,&nbsp;Amelita M Aguilos,&nbsp;Mahasen Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/8768074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The one-stage assay is the most common method to measure factor VIII activity (FVIII : C) in hemophilia A patients. The chromogenic assay is another two-stage test involving purified coagulation factors followed by factor Xa-specific chromogenic substrate.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the discrepancy and correlation between the chromogenic and one-stage assays in measuring FVIII : C levels in hemophilia patients receiving Extended Half-Life Elocta® as a recombinant extended half-life coagulation factor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a study comparing the measurements of FVIII : C levels by the chromogenic versus the one-stage assays at different drug levels. Data of FVIII : C levels, dosage, and the time interval from administration to measurement were retrieved from the hospital records. The correlation, mean differences, and discrepancy between the two assays were calculated. The linear regression analysis was used to predict the time interval till reaching 1% FVIII : C.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen patients with 56 samples were included in the study. Of them, 13 patients were receiving Elocta® as a prophylactic, while one was receiving Elocta® on demand. One-third of these samples showed a discrepancy between the chromogenic and one-stage assays. The two assays were well correlated. Mean differences were significant at the individual and the time interval level. The time since the last Elocta® injection could significantly predict FVIII : C levels (<i>β</i> = 0.366, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggested a significant difference between both methods; the FVIII : C levels measured by the one-stage assay were less than those estimated by the chromogenic assay. However, the measurements of FVIII levels by the two assays were well correlated but discrepant in one-third of the samples. The levels of FVIII : C reach 1% after 5.4 days since the last Elocta® administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Hematology\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"8768074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/8768074\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8768074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8768074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:一期法是血友病A患者中最常用的检测因子VIII活性(FVIII: C)的方法。显色试验是另一个两阶段试验,涉及纯化的凝血因子,然后是因子xa特异性显色底物。目的:本研究旨在评估在接受延长半衰期Elocta®作为重组延长半衰期凝血因子的血友病患者中,显色法和一期法测量FVIII: C水平的差异和相关性。方法:比较显色法和一期法在不同药物水平下测定的FVIII: C水平。FVIII: C水平、剂量和从给药到测量的时间间隔数据从医院记录中检索。计算两种测定方法的相关性、平均差异和差异。采用线性回归分析预测时间间隔至1% FVIII: C。结果:14例患者56份样本纳入研究。其中,13例患者接受Elocta®作为预防用药,1例患者接受Elocta®按需用药。这些样品的三分之一显示出显色和单阶段分析之间的差异。这两种分析结果具有良好的相关性。个体和时间间隔水平上的平均差异显著。最后一次注射Elocta®后的时间可以显著预测FVIII: C水平(β = 0.366, P < 0.001)。结论:我们的研究结果表明两种方法之间存在显著差异;一期法测得的FVIII: C水平低于显色法。然而,在三分之一的样本中,两种测定法测量的FVIII水平相关性很好,但存在差异。自最后一次使用Elocta®后5.4天FVIII: C水平达到1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Performance of Extended Half-Life Coagulation Factor VIII, FC Fusion Protein by Using Chromogenic and One-Stage Assays in Saudi Hemophilia A Patients.

Background: The one-stage assay is the most common method to measure factor VIII activity (FVIII : C) in hemophilia A patients. The chromogenic assay is another two-stage test involving purified coagulation factors followed by factor Xa-specific chromogenic substrate.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the discrepancy and correlation between the chromogenic and one-stage assays in measuring FVIII : C levels in hemophilia patients receiving Extended Half-Life Elocta® as a recombinant extended half-life coagulation factor.

Methods: We performed a study comparing the measurements of FVIII : C levels by the chromogenic versus the one-stage assays at different drug levels. Data of FVIII : C levels, dosage, and the time interval from administration to measurement were retrieved from the hospital records. The correlation, mean differences, and discrepancy between the two assays were calculated. The linear regression analysis was used to predict the time interval till reaching 1% FVIII : C.

Results: Fourteen patients with 56 samples were included in the study. Of them, 13 patients were receiving Elocta® as a prophylactic, while one was receiving Elocta® on demand. One-third of these samples showed a discrepancy between the chromogenic and one-stage assays. The two assays were well correlated. Mean differences were significant at the individual and the time interval level. The time since the last Elocta® injection could significantly predict FVIII : C levels (β = 0.366, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Our findings suggested a significant difference between both methods; the FVIII : C levels measured by the one-stage assay were less than those estimated by the chromogenic assay. However, the measurements of FVIII levels by the two assays were well correlated but discrepant in one-third of the samples. The levels of FVIII : C reach 1% after 5.4 days since the last Elocta® administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Hematology
Advances in Hematology Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Variability in Notification of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Sickle Cell Trait Across the United States. Early Molecular Response to Imatinib First-Line Therapy and Predictive Factors of Poor Outcomes for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Côte d'Ivoire. Relationships Between Markers of Iron Status and Hematological Parameters in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease. A Comparative Analysis of Hydroxyurea Treatment on Coagulation Profile Among Sickle Cell Anaemia Children in Lagos, Nigeria. Advancements in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: From Signaling Pathways to Targeted Therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1