以蒽环类和吉西他滨为基础的化疗辅助治疗I期子宫平滑肌肉瘤:两个参考中心的回顾性分析

Clinical Sarcoma Research Pub Date : 2020-08-28 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s13569-020-00139-3
Giovanni Fucà, Chiara Fabbroni, Rosanna Mancari, Sara Manglaviti, Giorgio Bogani, Elena Fumagalli, Rossella Bertulli, Carlo Morosi, Paola Collini, Francesco Raspagliesi, Nicoletta Colombo, Paolo G Casali, Roberta Sanfilippo
{"title":"以蒽环类和吉西他滨为基础的化疗辅助治疗I期子宫平滑肌肉瘤:两个参考中心的回顾性分析","authors":"Giovanni Fucà,&nbsp;Chiara Fabbroni,&nbsp;Rosanna Mancari,&nbsp;Sara Manglaviti,&nbsp;Giorgio Bogani,&nbsp;Elena Fumagalli,&nbsp;Rossella Bertulli,&nbsp;Carlo Morosi,&nbsp;Paola Collini,&nbsp;Francesco Raspagliesi,&nbsp;Nicoletta Colombo,&nbsp;Paolo G Casali,&nbsp;Roberta Sanfilippo","doi":"10.1186/s13569-020-00139-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radically resected early uterine leiomyosarcoma (eULMS) is still marked by a poor prognosis. Adjuvant strategies investigated up to now have not been corroborated by controlled studies. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of eULMS patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at two Italian reference centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this explorative, retrospective, cohort analysis, we included all the consecutive patients with radically resected eULMS treated at two centers between 1997 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 consecutive patients were included. Sixty-six (60%) received an anthracycline-based regimen, whereas 43 (40%) received a gemcitabine-based regimen. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 41.3 months with anthracycline-based regimens compared to 20.9 months with gemcitabine-based regimens (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.30-0.80; <i>P</i> = 0.004). In the multivariable model, anthracycline-based regimens were independently associated with a better DFS. No difference in terms of overall survival was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DFS was not the same by using an anthracycline-based or a gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with radically resected eULMS. The results of our study are in line with recent prospective controlled evidence in limb and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas. The role of anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy should still be viewed as a research issue in eULMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10684,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-020-00139-3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anthracycline-based and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting for stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective analysis at two reference centers.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Fucà,&nbsp;Chiara Fabbroni,&nbsp;Rosanna Mancari,&nbsp;Sara Manglaviti,&nbsp;Giorgio Bogani,&nbsp;Elena Fumagalli,&nbsp;Rossella Bertulli,&nbsp;Carlo Morosi,&nbsp;Paola Collini,&nbsp;Francesco Raspagliesi,&nbsp;Nicoletta Colombo,&nbsp;Paolo G Casali,&nbsp;Roberta Sanfilippo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13569-020-00139-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radically resected early uterine leiomyosarcoma (eULMS) is still marked by a poor prognosis. Adjuvant strategies investigated up to now have not been corroborated by controlled studies. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of eULMS patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at two Italian reference centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this explorative, retrospective, cohort analysis, we included all the consecutive patients with radically resected eULMS treated at two centers between 1997 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 109 consecutive patients were included. Sixty-six (60%) received an anthracycline-based regimen, whereas 43 (40%) received a gemcitabine-based regimen. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 41.3 months with anthracycline-based regimens compared to 20.9 months with gemcitabine-based regimens (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.30-0.80; <i>P</i> = 0.004). In the multivariable model, anthracycline-based regimens were independently associated with a better DFS. No difference in terms of overall survival was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DFS was not the same by using an anthracycline-based or a gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with radically resected eULMS. The results of our study are in line with recent prospective controlled evidence in limb and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas. The role of anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy should still be viewed as a research issue in eULMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13569-020-00139-3\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Sarcoma Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-020-00139-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Sarcoma Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13569-020-00139-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:根治性切除的早期子宫平滑肌肉瘤(eULMS)仍然以预后不良为特征。到目前为止,对辅助治疗策略的研究还没有得到对照研究的证实。我们回顾性地回顾了在意大利两个参考中心接受蒽环类或吉西他滨辅助化疗的eULMS患者的临床结果。方法:在这项探索性、回顾性、队列分析中,我们纳入了1997年至2017年在两个中心接受根治性切除的所有连续患者。结果:共纳入109例连续患者。66人(60%)接受了基于蒽环类药物的方案,而43人(40%)接受了基于吉西他滨的方案。蒽环类药物方案的中位无病生存期(DFS)为41.3个月,而吉西他滨方案的中位无病生存期为20.9个月(HR: 0.49;95% ci: 0.30-0.80;p = 0.004)。在多变量模型中,以蒽环类药物为基础的方案与更好的DFS独立相关。在总生存期方面没有观察到差异。结论:对于根治性切除的eULMS患者,以蒽环类药物为基础或以吉西他滨为基础的辅助化疗的DFS是不同的。我们的研究结果与最近肢体和浅表躯干软组织肉瘤的前瞻性对照证据一致。蒽环类药物辅助化疗在eULMS中的作用仍应被视为一个研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anthracycline-based and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting for stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma: a retrospective analysis at two reference centers.

Background: Radically resected early uterine leiomyosarcoma (eULMS) is still marked by a poor prognosis. Adjuvant strategies investigated up to now have not been corroborated by controlled studies. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcome of eULMS patients treated with adjuvant anthracycline-based or gemcitabine-based chemotherapy at two Italian reference centers.

Methods: In this explorative, retrospective, cohort analysis, we included all the consecutive patients with radically resected eULMS treated at two centers between 1997 and 2017.

Results: A total of 109 consecutive patients were included. Sixty-six (60%) received an anthracycline-based regimen, whereas 43 (40%) received a gemcitabine-based regimen. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 41.3 months with anthracycline-based regimens compared to 20.9 months with gemcitabine-based regimens (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.30-0.80; P = 0.004). In the multivariable model, anthracycline-based regimens were independently associated with a better DFS. No difference in terms of overall survival was observed.

Conclusions: DFS was not the same by using an anthracycline-based or a gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with radically resected eULMS. The results of our study are in line with recent prospective controlled evidence in limb and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas. The role of anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy should still be viewed as a research issue in eULMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Sarcoma Research considers for publication articles related to research on sarcomas, including both soft tissue and bone. The journal publishes original articles and review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of sarcomas along with new insights in sarcoma research, which may be of immediate or future interest for diagnosis and treatment. The journal also considers negative results, especially those from studies on new agents, as it is vital for the medical community to learn whether new agents have been proven effective or ineffective within subtypes of sarcomas. The journal also aims to offer a forum for active discussion on topics of major interest for the sarcoma community, which may be related to both research results and methodological topics.
期刊最新文献
Partial response to erlotinib in a patient with imatinib-refractory sacral chordoma. Locally recurrent extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the shoulder: a case of complete neoadjuvant radiotherapy response. The role of prognostic nutritional index in the management of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma. Ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy: the EEG with frontal intermittent delta activity, and rapid resolution with methylene blue: A case report. Simultaneous diagnosis of liver PEComa in a family with known Li-Fraumeni syndrome: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1