对埃塞俄比亚死产和早期新生儿死亡错误分类的患者-提供者沟通和提供者报告进行定性评估。

IF 1 Q2 Medicine Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04549-9
Andreea A Creanga, Madeline Woo, Abiy Seifu Estifanos, Hanna Feleke, Dorka Woldesenbet, Eskinder Kebede, Habibat Oguntade, Li Liu, Mahlet Y Gebremariam
{"title":"对埃塞俄比亚死产和早期新生儿死亡错误分类的患者-提供者沟通和提供者报告进行定性评估。","authors":"Andreea A Creanga,&nbsp;Madeline Woo,&nbsp;Abiy Seifu Estifanos,&nbsp;Hanna Feleke,&nbsp;Dorka Woldesenbet,&nbsp;Eskinder Kebede,&nbsp;Habibat Oguntade,&nbsp;Li Liu,&nbsp;Mahlet Y Gebremariam","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04549-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor communication between patients and providers can lead to misunderstanding and misclassification of clinical information, including pregnancy outcomes by women. This qualitative study with maternity care providers explores patient-provider communications regarding stillbirths (SB) and early neonatal deaths (END) and potential SB-END misclassification in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data were collected through 8 in-depth interviews and 3 focus group discussions with maternity care providers at Tikur Anbessa and Gandhi Memorial hospitals in Addis-Ababa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six maternity care providers (10 physicians;16 nurses/midwives) were interviewed. Providers noted that high patient loads negatively influence their provision of quality care to patients. Yet, despite patients generally not asking many questions during their delivery hospitalization, maternity care providers reported offering information about pregnancy outcomes at hospital discharge. The level of education was the most cited factor influencing patients' understanding of the information communicated to them, especially with regard to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Respondents reported that women do not have significant misconceptions about either SB or END. Nevertheless, they also revealed that both purposeful and accidental SB-END misclassification occurs. Reports of the direction of such misclassification differed by type of provider - physicians noted that misclassification of SB as END is most common, while nurses and midwives identified the opposite direction for this type of misclassification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maternity care providers' reporting practices and the quality of their communication with patients contribute to the SB-END misclassification in Ethiopia. There is need to increase providers' awareness of the importance of capturing and reporting reliable and valid information on pregnancy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"72 3","pages":"138-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative assessment of patient-provider communication and provider reporting on misclassification of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths in Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Andreea A Creanga,&nbsp;Madeline Woo,&nbsp;Abiy Seifu Estifanos,&nbsp;Hanna Feleke,&nbsp;Dorka Woldesenbet,&nbsp;Eskinder Kebede,&nbsp;Habibat Oguntade,&nbsp;Li Liu,&nbsp;Mahlet Y Gebremariam\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04549-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Poor communication between patients and providers can lead to misunderstanding and misclassification of clinical information, including pregnancy outcomes by women. This qualitative study with maternity care providers explores patient-provider communications regarding stillbirths (SB) and early neonatal deaths (END) and potential SB-END misclassification in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data were collected through 8 in-depth interviews and 3 focus group discussions with maternity care providers at Tikur Anbessa and Gandhi Memorial hospitals in Addis-Ababa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six maternity care providers (10 physicians;16 nurses/midwives) were interviewed. Providers noted that high patient loads negatively influence their provision of quality care to patients. Yet, despite patients generally not asking many questions during their delivery hospitalization, maternity care providers reported offering information about pregnancy outcomes at hospital discharge. The level of education was the most cited factor influencing patients' understanding of the information communicated to them, especially with regard to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Respondents reported that women do not have significant misconceptions about either SB or END. Nevertheless, they also revealed that both purposeful and accidental SB-END misclassification occurs. Reports of the direction of such misclassification differed by type of provider - physicians noted that misclassification of SB as END is most common, while nurses and midwives identified the opposite direction for this type of misclassification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maternity care providers' reporting practices and the quality of their communication with patients contribute to the SB-END misclassification in Ethiopia. There is need to increase providers' awareness of the importance of capturing and reporting reliable and valid information on pregnancy outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva ginecologica\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"138-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva ginecologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04549-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04549-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:患者和医疗服务提供者之间沟通不畅可能导致临床信息的误解和错误分类,包括妇女的妊娠结局。本定性研究与产科护理提供者探讨死产(SB)和早期新生儿死亡(END)的患者-提供者沟通和潜在的SB-END错误分类在埃塞俄比亚。方法:对亚的斯亚贝巴提库尔安贝萨医院和甘地纪念医院的产科护理人员进行8次深度访谈和3次焦点小组讨论,收集定性数据。结果:采访了26名产科服务提供者(10名医生,16名护士/助产士)。提供者指出,高病人负荷对他们为病人提供高质量护理产生负面影响。然而,尽管患者在分娩住院期间通常不会问很多问题,但据报道,产科护理提供者在出院时提供了有关妊娠结局的信息。受教育程度是影响患者理解传达给他们的信息的最主要因素,尤其是关于不良妊娠结局的信息。受访者表示,女性对SB或END都没有明显的误解。然而,他们也揭示了有目的和偶然的SB-END错误分类的发生。这种错误分类方向的报告因提供者的类型而异-医生注意到将SB错误分类为END是最常见的,而护士和助产士则认为这种类型的错误分类方向相反。结论:产妇保健提供者的报告实践和他们与患者沟通的质量有助于埃塞俄比亚的SB-END错误分类。有必要提高提供者对获取和报告有关妊娠结果的可靠和有效信息的重要性的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qualitative assessment of patient-provider communication and provider reporting on misclassification of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths in Ethiopia.

Background: Poor communication between patients and providers can lead to misunderstanding and misclassification of clinical information, including pregnancy outcomes by women. This qualitative study with maternity care providers explores patient-provider communications regarding stillbirths (SB) and early neonatal deaths (END) and potential SB-END misclassification in Ethiopia.

Methods: Qualitative data were collected through 8 in-depth interviews and 3 focus group discussions with maternity care providers at Tikur Anbessa and Gandhi Memorial hospitals in Addis-Ababa.

Results: Twenty-six maternity care providers (10 physicians;16 nurses/midwives) were interviewed. Providers noted that high patient loads negatively influence their provision of quality care to patients. Yet, despite patients generally not asking many questions during their delivery hospitalization, maternity care providers reported offering information about pregnancy outcomes at hospital discharge. The level of education was the most cited factor influencing patients' understanding of the information communicated to them, especially with regard to adverse pregnancy outcomes. Respondents reported that women do not have significant misconceptions about either SB or END. Nevertheless, they also revealed that both purposeful and accidental SB-END misclassification occurs. Reports of the direction of such misclassification differed by type of provider - physicians noted that misclassification of SB as END is most common, while nurses and midwives identified the opposite direction for this type of misclassification.

Conclusions: Maternity care providers' reporting practices and the quality of their communication with patients contribute to the SB-END misclassification in Ethiopia. There is need to increase providers' awareness of the importance of capturing and reporting reliable and valid information on pregnancy outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Minilaparoscopy in gynecology: applications, benefits and limitations. Re-birth in a Covid hospital: a point of view. Endometriosis-associated infertility: surgery or IVF? Cesarean delivery: an evidence-based review on of the technique. Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1