每日一次缓释奥卡西平(Oxtellar XR®)单药治疗成人和儿童部分发作性癫痫的预测疗效:暴露-反应建模和模拟

IF 3.1 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications Pub Date : 2020-09-23 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CPAA.S256972
Shamia Faison, Roberto Gomeni, Shannon Mendes, Welton O'Neal, Stefan Schwabe, Azmi Nasser
{"title":"每日一次缓释奥卡西平(Oxtellar XR®)单药治疗成人和儿童部分发作性癫痫的预测疗效:暴露-反应建模和模拟","authors":"Shamia Faison, Roberto Gomeni, Shannon Mendes, Welton O'Neal, Stefan Schwabe, Azmi Nasser","doi":"10.2147/CPAA.S256972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We conducted exposure-response modeling and simulations to compare the predicted efficacy of extended-release oxcarbazepine (OXC-XR), an oral once-daily (qd) antiepileptic drug, with that of immediate-release (IR) OXC twice-daily (bid) when the agents are used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy characterized by partial-onset seizures (POS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Modeling assessed percent change from baseline 28-day seizure frequency (PCH) as a function of minimum concentration (C<sub>min</sub>) of monohydroxy derivative (MHD), the clinically relevant metabolite of OXC. For OXC-IR, the model used historical data; values for OXC-XR were derived from observed data. The model was simulated (N=100) to predict PCH at MHD C<sub>min</sub> concentrations achieved with 1200 and 2400 mg/day in adults and children receiving OXC-XR qd or OXC-IR bid. Mean PCH and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predicted efficacy was not different (ie, 95% CI of mean PCH overlapped) for OXC-XR qd vs OXC-IR bid at mean MHD C<sub>min</sub> concentrations achieved with 1200 and 2400 mg/day adjunctive OXC-XR (47.4 and 76.4 µmol/L) and at target MHD C<sub>min</sub> concentrations for OXC-IR monotherapy (59.1 and 112 µmol/L) in adults. Predicted efficacy in adults vs children was not different between formulations. Depending on MHD C<sub>min</sub>, the predicted mean PCH in adults ranged from -51.4% to -73.4% with OXC-XR qd and -53.2% to -78.5% with OXC-IR bid. In children, the predicted mean PCH ranged from -48.4% to -58.1% (OXC-XR qd) and -32.5% to -70.4% (OXC-IR bid).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This model-based analysis predicted comparable efficacy for OXC-XR qd vs OXC-IR bid at MHD C<sub>min</sub> concentrations corresponding to 1200 and 2400 mg/day as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. Based on this analysis, the US Food & Drug Administration approved OXC-XR for use as monotherapy in adults and children ≥6 years of age with POS.</p>","PeriodicalId":10406,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","volume":"12 ","pages":"135-147"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S256972","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicted Efficacy of Once-Daily Extended-Release Oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XR<sup>®</sup>) Monotherapy in Adults and Children with Partial-Onset Seizures: Exposure-Response Modeling and Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Shamia Faison, Roberto Gomeni, Shannon Mendes, Welton O'Neal, Stefan Schwabe, Azmi Nasser\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CPAA.S256972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We conducted exposure-response modeling and simulations to compare the predicted efficacy of extended-release oxcarbazepine (OXC-XR), an oral once-daily (qd) antiepileptic drug, with that of immediate-release (IR) OXC twice-daily (bid) when the agents are used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy characterized by partial-onset seizures (POS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Modeling assessed percent change from baseline 28-day seizure frequency (PCH) as a function of minimum concentration (C<sub>min</sub>) of monohydroxy derivative (MHD), the clinically relevant metabolite of OXC. For OXC-IR, the model used historical data; values for OXC-XR were derived from observed data. The model was simulated (N=100) to predict PCH at MHD C<sub>min</sub> concentrations achieved with 1200 and 2400 mg/day in adults and children receiving OXC-XR qd or OXC-IR bid. Mean PCH and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Predicted efficacy was not different (ie, 95% CI of mean PCH overlapped) for OXC-XR qd vs OXC-IR bid at mean MHD C<sub>min</sub> concentrations achieved with 1200 and 2400 mg/day adjunctive OXC-XR (47.4 and 76.4 µmol/L) and at target MHD C<sub>min</sub> concentrations for OXC-IR monotherapy (59.1 and 112 µmol/L) in adults. Predicted efficacy in adults vs children was not different between formulations. Depending on MHD C<sub>min</sub>, the predicted mean PCH in adults ranged from -51.4% to -73.4% with OXC-XR qd and -53.2% to -78.5% with OXC-IR bid. In children, the predicted mean PCH ranged from -48.4% to -58.1% (OXC-XR qd) and -32.5% to -70.4% (OXC-IR bid).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This model-based analysis predicted comparable efficacy for OXC-XR qd vs OXC-IR bid at MHD C<sub>min</sub> concentrations corresponding to 1200 and 2400 mg/day as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. Based on this analysis, the US Food & Drug Administration approved OXC-XR for use as monotherapy in adults and children ≥6 years of age with POS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"135-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S256972\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S256972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S256972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:我们通过暴露反应建模和模拟来比较缓释奥卡西平(OXC- xr)(一种口服每日一次(qd)的抗癫痫药物)与速释OXC (IR)每日两次(bid)在部分发作性癫痫(POS)的癫痫患者中作为单药或辅助治疗时的预测疗效。方法:建模评估从基线28天癫痫发作频率(PCH)的百分比变化作为单羟基衍生物(MHD)最低浓度(Cmin)的函数,该衍生物是OXC的临床相关代谢物。对于OXC-IR,模型使用历史数据;OXC-XR值由观测数据得出。该模型被模拟(N=100),以预测接受OXC-XR qd或OXC-IR bid的成人和儿童在MHD Cmin浓度为1200和2400 mg/d时的PCH。生成并比较平均PCH和95%置信区间(ci)。结果:OXC-XR qd和OXC-IR bid在1200和2400 mg/天辅助OXC-XR达到的平均MHD Cmin浓度(47.4和76.4µmol/L)和OXC-IR单药治疗的目标MHD Cmin浓度(59.1和112µmol/L)下的预测疗效没有差异(即平均PCH重叠的95% CI)。不同配方对成人和儿童的预测疗效没有差异。根据MHD Cmin, OXC-XR qd预测成人平均PCH为-51.4%至-73.4%,OXC-IR bid为-53.2%至-78.5%。在儿童中,预测的平均PCH范围为-48.4%至-58.1% (OXC-XR qd)和-32.5%至-70.4% (OXC-IR bid)。结论:该基于模型的分析预测,在MHD Cmin浓度分别为1200和2400 mg/天时,OXC-XR qd与OXC-IR bid作为单一治疗或辅助治疗的疗效相当。基于这一分析,美国食品和药物管理局批准OXC-XR作为单药治疗成人和6岁以上POS患儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicted Efficacy of Once-Daily Extended-Release Oxcarbazepine (Oxtellar XR®) Monotherapy in Adults and Children with Partial-Onset Seizures: Exposure-Response Modeling and Simulation.

Purpose: We conducted exposure-response modeling and simulations to compare the predicted efficacy of extended-release oxcarbazepine (OXC-XR), an oral once-daily (qd) antiepileptic drug, with that of immediate-release (IR) OXC twice-daily (bid) when the agents are used as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy characterized by partial-onset seizures (POS).

Methods: Modeling assessed percent change from baseline 28-day seizure frequency (PCH) as a function of minimum concentration (Cmin) of monohydroxy derivative (MHD), the clinically relevant metabolite of OXC. For OXC-IR, the model used historical data; values for OXC-XR were derived from observed data. The model was simulated (N=100) to predict PCH at MHD Cmin concentrations achieved with 1200 and 2400 mg/day in adults and children receiving OXC-XR qd or OXC-IR bid. Mean PCH and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were generated and compared.

Results: Predicted efficacy was not different (ie, 95% CI of mean PCH overlapped) for OXC-XR qd vs OXC-IR bid at mean MHD Cmin concentrations achieved with 1200 and 2400 mg/day adjunctive OXC-XR (47.4 and 76.4 µmol/L) and at target MHD Cmin concentrations for OXC-IR monotherapy (59.1 and 112 µmol/L) in adults. Predicted efficacy in adults vs children was not different between formulations. Depending on MHD Cmin, the predicted mean PCH in adults ranged from -51.4% to -73.4% with OXC-XR qd and -53.2% to -78.5% with OXC-IR bid. In children, the predicted mean PCH ranged from -48.4% to -58.1% (OXC-XR qd) and -32.5% to -70.4% (OXC-IR bid).

Conclusion: This model-based analysis predicted comparable efficacy for OXC-XR qd vs OXC-IR bid at MHD Cmin concentrations corresponding to 1200 and 2400 mg/day as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy. Based on this analysis, the US Food & Drug Administration approved OXC-XR for use as monotherapy in adults and children ≥6 years of age with POS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Severe Hypertensive Response to Atropine Therapy for Bradycardia Associated with Dexmedetomidine: Case Report and Literature Review. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Dronedarone and Amiodarone Used During the Blind Period in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation Ipratropium Bromide/Salbutamol-Induced Acute Urinary Retention as a Result of Medication Error: A Case Report and Review of Cases in the Literature. Allopurinol-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS). Systematic Review of Safety of RTS,S with AS01 and AS02 Adjuvant Systems Using Data from Randomized Controlled Trials in Infants, Children, and Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1