12 周及以上流产的医疗方案:系统回顾和荟萃分析

Q2 Medicine Contraception: X Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.conx.2020.100037
Katherine Whitehouse , Ashley Brant , Marita Sporstol Fonhus , Antonella Lavelanet , Bela Ganatra
{"title":"12 周及以上流产的医疗方案:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Katherine Whitehouse ,&nbsp;Ashley Brant ,&nbsp;Marita Sporstol Fonhus ,&nbsp;Antonella Lavelanet ,&nbsp;Bela Ganatra","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mifepristone and misoprostol are recommended for second-trimester medical abortion, but consensus is unclear on the ideal regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objectives were to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating efficacy, safety and satisfaction of medical abortion at ≥<!--> <!-->12 weeks' gestation.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Popline, Embase, Global Index Medicus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from January 2008 to May 2017.</p></div><div><h3>Study eligibility, participants and interventions</h3><p>We included RCTs on medical abortion at ≥<!--> <!-->12 weeks' gestation using mifepristone and/or misoprostol. We excluded studies with spontaneous abortion, fetal demise and mechanical cervical ripening and those not reporting ongoing pregnancy (OP).</p></div><div><h3>Study appraisal and synthesis methods</h3><p>After extracting prespecified data and assessing risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane handbook, we used Revman5 software to combine data and GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 43 of the 1894 references identified. Combination mifepristone–misoprostol had lower rates of OP [risk ratio (RR) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04–0.35] vs. misoprostol only. A 24-h interval between mifepristone and misoprostol had lower OP rate at 24 h than simultaneous dosing (RR 3.13, 95% CI 1.23–7.94). Every 3-h dosing had lower OP rate at 48 h (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.88).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Direct comparisons of buccal misoprostol to sublingual or vaginal routes after mifepristone were limited. Evidence from clinical trials on how to best manage women with prior uterine incisions was lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our analysis supports the use of mifepristone 200 mg 1 to 2 days before misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally every 3 h at ≥<!--> <!-->12 weeks' gestation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Where available, providers should use mifepristone plus misoprostol for second-trimester medical abortion. Vaginal misoprostol appears to be most efficacious with fewest side effects, but sublingual and buccal routes are also acceptable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100037"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100037","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical regimens for abortion at 12 weeks and above: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Whitehouse ,&nbsp;Ashley Brant ,&nbsp;Marita Sporstol Fonhus ,&nbsp;Antonella Lavelanet ,&nbsp;Bela Ganatra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mifepristone and misoprostol are recommended for second-trimester medical abortion, but consensus is unclear on the ideal regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objectives were to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating efficacy, safety and satisfaction of medical abortion at ≥<!--> <!-->12 weeks' gestation.</p></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><p>We searched PubMed, Popline, Embase, Global Index Medicus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from January 2008 to May 2017.</p></div><div><h3>Study eligibility, participants and interventions</h3><p>We included RCTs on medical abortion at ≥<!--> <!-->12 weeks' gestation using mifepristone and/or misoprostol. We excluded studies with spontaneous abortion, fetal demise and mechanical cervical ripening and those not reporting ongoing pregnancy (OP).</p></div><div><h3>Study appraisal and synthesis methods</h3><p>After extracting prespecified data and assessing risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane handbook, we used Revman5 software to combine data and GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 43 of the 1894 references identified. Combination mifepristone–misoprostol had lower rates of OP [risk ratio (RR) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04–0.35] vs. misoprostol only. A 24-h interval between mifepristone and misoprostol had lower OP rate at 24 h than simultaneous dosing (RR 3.13, 95% CI 1.23–7.94). Every 3-h dosing had lower OP rate at 48 h (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.88).</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>Direct comparisons of buccal misoprostol to sublingual or vaginal routes after mifepristone were limited. Evidence from clinical trials on how to best manage women with prior uterine incisions was lacking.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our analysis supports the use of mifepristone 200 mg 1 to 2 days before misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally every 3 h at ≥<!--> <!-->12 weeks' gestation.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Where available, providers should use mifepristone plus misoprostol for second-trimester medical abortion. Vaginal misoprostol appears to be most efficacious with fewest side effects, but sublingual and buccal routes are also acceptable.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100037\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100037\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:米非司酮和米索前列醇被推荐用于中期妊娠药物流产,但对于理想方案的共识尚不明确。目的系统回顾研究妊娠≥12 周药物流产的疗效、安全性和满意度的随机对照试验(rct)。我们检索了2008年1月至2017年5月的PubMed、Popline、Embase、Global Index Medicus、Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials和国际临床试验注册平台。研究资格、参与者和干预措施我们纳入了妊娠≥12 周使用米非司酮和/或米索前列醇进行药物流产的随机对照试验。我们排除了自然流产、胎儿死亡、机械宫颈成熟和未报告妊娠的研究。研究评价和综合方法在提取预先指定的数据并根据Cochrane手册评估偏倚风险后,我们使用Revman5软件将数据和GRADE结合起来评估证据的确定性。结果纳入1894篇文献中的43篇。米非司酮-米索前列醇联合治疗的OP发生率较单用米索前列醇低[风险比(RR) 0.12, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.04-0.35]。米非司酮和米索前列醇之间间隔24 h,在24 h时的OP率低于同时给药(RR 3.13, 95% CI 1.23-7.94)。每给药3 h,在48 h时OP率降低(RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.88)。局限性:米非司酮后口腔米索前列醇与舌下或阴道途径的直接比较是有限的。缺乏关于如何最好地处理既往子宫切口妇女的临床试验证据。结论:我们的分析支持在妊娠≥12 周时,米非司酮200 mg先于米索前列醇400 mcg每3 h阴道使用1 - 2天。在可能的情况下,提供者应使用米非司酮加米索前列醇进行中期妊娠药物流产。阴道米索前列醇似乎是最有效的,副作用最少,但舌下和口腔途径也是可以接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical regimens for abortion at 12 weeks and above: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Mifepristone and misoprostol are recommended for second-trimester medical abortion, but consensus is unclear on the ideal regimen.

Objectives

The objectives were to systematically review randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating efficacy, safety and satisfaction of medical abortion at ≥ 12 weeks' gestation.

Data sources

We searched PubMed, Popline, Embase, Global Index Medicus, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from January 2008 to May 2017.

Study eligibility, participants and interventions

We included RCTs on medical abortion at ≥ 12 weeks' gestation using mifepristone and/or misoprostol. We excluded studies with spontaneous abortion, fetal demise and mechanical cervical ripening and those not reporting ongoing pregnancy (OP).

Study appraisal and synthesis methods

After extracting prespecified data and assessing risk of bias in accordance with the Cochrane handbook, we used Revman5 software to combine data and GRADE to assess certainty of evidence.

Results

We included 43 of the 1894 references identified. Combination mifepristone–misoprostol had lower rates of OP [risk ratio (RR) 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04–0.35] vs. misoprostol only. A 24-h interval between mifepristone and misoprostol had lower OP rate at 24 h than simultaneous dosing (RR 3.13, 95% CI 1.23–7.94). Every 3-h dosing had lower OP rate at 48 h (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.88).

Limitations

Direct comparisons of buccal misoprostol to sublingual or vaginal routes after mifepristone were limited. Evidence from clinical trials on how to best manage women with prior uterine incisions was lacking.

Conclusion

Our analysis supports the use of mifepristone 200 mg 1 to 2 days before misoprostol 400 mcg vaginally every 3 h at ≥ 12 weeks' gestation.

Implications

Where available, providers should use mifepristone plus misoprostol for second-trimester medical abortion. Vaginal misoprostol appears to be most efficacious with fewest side effects, but sublingual and buccal routes are also acceptable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Outpatient medical management of later second trimester abortion (18–23.6 weeks) with procedural evacuation backup: A large case series Experiences of delay-causing obstacles and mental health at the time of abortion seeking Maximizing the effectiveness of 1.5 mg levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: The case for precoital use How does person-centered maternity care relate to postpartum contraceptive counseling and use? Evidence from a longitudinal study of women delivering at health facilities in Ethiopia Dilation and evacuation versus medication abortion at 15–24 weeks of gestation in low-middle income country: A retrospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1