静脉血栓栓塞风险的荟萃分析:卵巢癌患者在诊断时的分期、组织学、细胞减少和腹水。

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and Gynecology International Pub Date : 2020-09-03 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/2374716
Kristin S Weeks, Emma Herbach, Megan McDonald, Mary Charlton, Marin L Schweizer
{"title":"静脉血栓栓塞风险的荟萃分析:卵巢癌患者在诊断时的分期、组织学、细胞减少和腹水。","authors":"Kristin S Weeks,&nbsp;Emma Herbach,&nbsp;Megan McDonald,&nbsp;Mary Charlton,&nbsp;Marin L Schweizer","doi":"10.1155/2020/2374716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) have been a leading secondary cause of death among ovarian cancer patients, prompting multiple studies of risk factors. The objective of this meta-analysis is to quantify the associations between VTE and the most commonly reported risk factors among ovarian cancer patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were used to identify observational studies. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality via the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios for VTE with each of the following exposures: advanced cancer stage, clear cell histology, serous histology, ascites at diagnosis, and complete cytoreduction. The <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> and <i>Q</i> tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Twenty cohort studies with 6,324 total ovarian cancer patients, 769 of whom experienced a VTE, were included. The odds of VTE in ovarian cancer patients were higher among patients with cancer stage III/IV (versus cancer stage I/II, pooled odds ratio (OR) 2.73; 95% CI 1.84-4.06; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>= 64%), clear cell (versus nonclear cell) histology (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.55-2.89; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 6%), and ascites (versus no ascites) at diagnosis (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.51-2.96; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 32%). Serous (versus nonserous) histology (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.91-1.75; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 42%) and complete (versus incomplete) cytoreduction (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.27-4.11; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 88%) were not associated with VTE. This meta-analysis quantifies the significantly elevated odds of VTE in ovarian cancer patients with advanced stage at diagnosis, clear cell histology, and ascites at diagnosis. Further studies are needed to account for confounders and inform clinical decision-making tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/2374716","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis of VTE Risk: Ovarian Cancer Patients by Stage, Histology, Cytoreduction, and Ascites at Diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin S Weeks,&nbsp;Emma Herbach,&nbsp;Megan McDonald,&nbsp;Mary Charlton,&nbsp;Marin L Schweizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/2374716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) have been a leading secondary cause of death among ovarian cancer patients, prompting multiple studies of risk factors. The objective of this meta-analysis is to quantify the associations between VTE and the most commonly reported risk factors among ovarian cancer patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were used to identify observational studies. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality via the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios for VTE with each of the following exposures: advanced cancer stage, clear cell histology, serous histology, ascites at diagnosis, and complete cytoreduction. The <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> and <i>Q</i> tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Twenty cohort studies with 6,324 total ovarian cancer patients, 769 of whom experienced a VTE, were included. The odds of VTE in ovarian cancer patients were higher among patients with cancer stage III/IV (versus cancer stage I/II, pooled odds ratio (OR) 2.73; 95% CI 1.84-4.06; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup>= 64%), clear cell (versus nonclear cell) histology (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.55-2.89; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 6%), and ascites (versus no ascites) at diagnosis (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.51-2.96; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 32%). Serous (versus nonserous) histology (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.91-1.75; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 42%) and complete (versus incomplete) cytoreduction (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.27-4.11; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 88%) were not associated with VTE. This meta-analysis quantifies the significantly elevated odds of VTE in ovarian cancer patients with advanced stage at diagnosis, clear cell histology, and ascites at diagnosis. Further studies are needed to account for confounders and inform clinical decision-making tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/2374716\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2374716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2374716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

静脉血栓栓塞(vte)已成为卵巢癌患者死亡的主要次要原因,促使多项危险因素的研究。本荟萃分析的目的是量化VTE与卵巢癌患者中最常见的危险因素之间的关系。使用PubMed、Embase和护理及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)来确定观察性研究。两名审稿人独立提取数据并通过Newcastle-Ottawa工具评估质量。采用随机效应模型计算以下暴露情况下静脉血栓栓塞的合并优势比:晚期癌症、透明细胞组织学、浆液组织学、诊断时腹水和完全细胞减少。采用I 2和Q检验评价异质性。20项队列研究共纳入6324例卵巢癌患者,其中769例经历过静脉血栓栓塞。卵巢癌III/IV期患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的几率更高(与I/II期相比,合并优势比(OR) 2.73;95% ci 1.84-4.06;I 2= 64%),透明细胞(相对于非透明细胞)组织学(OR 2.11;95% ci 1.55-2.89;I 2 = 6%),诊断时出现腹水(相对于无腹水)(OR 2.12;95% ci 1.51-2.96;i2 = 32%)。浆液性(vs .非浆液性)组织学(OR 1.26;95% ci 0.91-1.75;I 2 = 42%)和完全(相对于不完全)细胞减少(OR 1.05;95% ci 0.27-4.11;I 2 = 88%)与VTE无关。该荟萃分析量化了诊断为晚期、细胞组织学清晰、诊断为腹水的卵巢癌患者发生静脉血栓栓塞的几率显著升高。需要进一步的研究来解释混杂因素并为临床决策工具提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meta-Analysis of VTE Risk: Ovarian Cancer Patients by Stage, Histology, Cytoreduction, and Ascites at Diagnosis.

Venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) have been a leading secondary cause of death among ovarian cancer patients, prompting multiple studies of risk factors. The objective of this meta-analysis is to quantify the associations between VTE and the most commonly reported risk factors among ovarian cancer patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were used to identify observational studies. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and assessed quality via the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios for VTE with each of the following exposures: advanced cancer stage, clear cell histology, serous histology, ascites at diagnosis, and complete cytoreduction. The I 2 and Q tests were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Twenty cohort studies with 6,324 total ovarian cancer patients, 769 of whom experienced a VTE, were included. The odds of VTE in ovarian cancer patients were higher among patients with cancer stage III/IV (versus cancer stage I/II, pooled odds ratio (OR) 2.73; 95% CI 1.84-4.06; I 2= 64%), clear cell (versus nonclear cell) histology (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.55-2.89; I 2 = 6%), and ascites (versus no ascites) at diagnosis (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.51-2.96; I 2 = 32%). Serous (versus nonserous) histology (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.91-1.75; I 2 = 42%) and complete (versus incomplete) cytoreduction (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.27-4.11; I 2 = 88%) were not associated with VTE. This meta-analysis quantifies the significantly elevated odds of VTE in ovarian cancer patients with advanced stage at diagnosis, clear cell histology, and ascites at diagnosis. Further studies are needed to account for confounders and inform clinical decision-making tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Obstetrics and Gynecology International OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of "Motivational Interviewing" and "Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills Model" Counseling Interventions on the Choice of Delivery Mode in Pregnant Women Using Face-to-Face Training vs. Mobile App: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Factors Influencing Induction of Labor Success in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccine Impact on Women's Menstrual Health within an 18-Month Follow-Up. Association of Hormonal Contraceptives with Depression among Women in Reproductive Age Groups: A Cross-Sectional Analytic Study. Comparison of Time to Pregnancy in In Vitro Fertilisation between Endometriosis and Nonendometriosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1