使用压力生物反馈装置进行4周腿筋拉伸的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-03-05 DOI:10.1142/S1013702520500092
Jin-Oh Ahn, Jong-Hyuck Weon, Eun-Kyung Koh, Do-Young Jung
{"title":"使用压力生物反馈装置进行4周腿筋拉伸的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Jin-Oh Ahn,&nbsp;Jong-Hyuck Weon,&nbsp;Eun-Kyung Koh,&nbsp;Do-Young Jung","doi":"10.1142/S1013702520500092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stretching and length test of hamstring muscles have been performed commonly to manage lower back pain (LBP) in sports rehabilitation. Previous literatures addressed that stretching techniques and length test of hamstring muscles should be performed with the pelvic maintained in an anterior tilt position. However, there is no study to determine the effectiveness of pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) to maintain in anterior pelvic tilting (APT) on length test and stretching of hamstring muscles.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of hamstring muscles stretching using a PBU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty participants with shortness of hamstrings randomized into two groups. Participants performed the active knee extension (AKE) stretching without (control group) or with PBU (intervention group) for four weeks. AKE tests without and with PBU were administered three times before and after hamstrings stretching by each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AKE test without PBU showed a significant main effect of time ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>01</mn></math> ) but not of group ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>55</mn></math> ) on the AKE angle. The AKE test with PBU showed a significant increase in the AKE angle in the post-intervention compared to the pre-intervention assessments in both groups ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>01</mn></math> ). The difference of AKE angle between the pre- and post-intervention results was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>01</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend the use of a PBU to maintain the pelvic anterior tilting position when performing the AKE test or AKE stretching.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1013702520500092","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of hamstring stretching using a pressure biofeedback unit for 4 weeks: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jin-Oh Ahn,&nbsp;Jong-Hyuck Weon,&nbsp;Eun-Kyung Koh,&nbsp;Do-Young Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S1013702520500092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stretching and length test of hamstring muscles have been performed commonly to manage lower back pain (LBP) in sports rehabilitation. Previous literatures addressed that stretching techniques and length test of hamstring muscles should be performed with the pelvic maintained in an anterior tilt position. However, there is no study to determine the effectiveness of pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) to maintain in anterior pelvic tilting (APT) on length test and stretching of hamstring muscles.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effectiveness of hamstring muscles stretching using a PBU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty participants with shortness of hamstrings randomized into two groups. Participants performed the active knee extension (AKE) stretching without (control group) or with PBU (intervention group) for four weeks. AKE tests without and with PBU were administered three times before and after hamstrings stretching by each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AKE test without PBU showed a significant main effect of time ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>01</mn></math> ) but not of group ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo>=</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>55</mn></math> ) on the AKE angle. The AKE test with PBU showed a significant increase in the AKE angle in the post-intervention compared to the pre-intervention assessments in both groups ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>01</mn></math> ). The difference of AKE angle between the pre- and post-intervention results was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group ( <math><mi>p</mi> <mo><</mo> <mn>0</mn> <mo>.</mo> <mn>01</mn></math> ).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We recommend the use of a PBU to maintain the pelvic anterior tilting position when performing the AKE test or AKE stretching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1142/S1013702520500092\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702520500092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/3/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S1013702520500092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在运动康复中,腘绳肌拉伸和长度测试是治疗腰痛的常用方法。先前的文献指出,拉伸技术和腘绳肌长度测试应在骨盆保持前倾位的情况下进行。然而,目前还没有研究确定压力生物反馈装置(PBU)在骨盆前倾(APT)长度测试和腘绳肌拉伸中的有效性。目的:探讨用PBU进行腘绳肌拉伸的效果。方法:40例腘绳肌短者随机分为两组。参与者在没有(对照组)或有PBU(干预组)的情况下进行主动膝关节伸展(AKE)伸展,为期四周。各组在腘绳肌拉伸前后分别进行3次无PBU和有PBU的AKE试验。结果:无PBU的AKE试验显示时间的主效应显著(p < 0.05)。p = 0.01),但组间无差异(p = 0.01)。55)在AKE角上。与干预前相比,PBU的AKE测试显示干预后两组的AKE角度显著增加(p < 0.05)。01)。干预组干预前后AKE角度差异显著大于对照组(p < 0.05)。01)。结论:我们建议在进行AKE试验或AKE拉伸时使用PBU来维持骨盆前倾位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Effectiveness of hamstring stretching using a pressure biofeedback unit for 4 weeks: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: Stretching and length test of hamstring muscles have been performed commonly to manage lower back pain (LBP) in sports rehabilitation. Previous literatures addressed that stretching techniques and length test of hamstring muscles should be performed with the pelvic maintained in an anterior tilt position. However, there is no study to determine the effectiveness of pressure biofeedback unit (PBU) to maintain in anterior pelvic tilting (APT) on length test and stretching of hamstring muscles.

Objective: To determine the effectiveness of hamstring muscles stretching using a PBU.

Methods: Forty participants with shortness of hamstrings randomized into two groups. Participants performed the active knee extension (AKE) stretching without (control group) or with PBU (intervention group) for four weeks. AKE tests without and with PBU were administered three times before and after hamstrings stretching by each group.

Results: The AKE test without PBU showed a significant main effect of time ( p < 0 . 01 ) but not of group ( p = 0 . 55 ) on the AKE angle. The AKE test with PBU showed a significant increase in the AKE angle in the post-intervention compared to the pre-intervention assessments in both groups ( p < 0 . 01 ). The difference of AKE angle between the pre- and post-intervention results was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group ( p < 0 . 01 ).

Conclusion: We recommend the use of a PBU to maintain the pelvic anterior tilting position when performing the AKE test or AKE stretching.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1