娃娃治疗痴呆:事实与争议。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Annals of Clinical Psychiatry Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.12788/acp.0010
Kala Chinnaswamy, Dominic M DeMarco, George T Grossberg
{"title":"娃娃治疗痴呆:事实与争议。","authors":"Kala Chinnaswamy,&nbsp;Dominic M DeMarco,&nbsp;George T Grossberg","doi":"10.12788/acp.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD), formerly known as dementia, is of increasing concern as the elderly population continues to grow. Doll therapy (DT) is a controversial method observed in clinical practice that has both promising benefits and potential ethical concerns. To date, little research has been done on this therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search was performed using the keywords \"dementia,\" \"elderly,\" \"dolls,\" \"doll therapy,\" and \"Alzheimer's disease.\" A list of pertinent articles was assembled, with irrelevant articles excluded. References from these articles were also reviewed and additional articles were included in the final list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Research on the utility of DT for patients with MNCD is limited. Current literature suggests that DT may be beneficial in decreasing the use of pharmacologic interventions and alleviating symptoms such as agitation and anxiety. However, most studies consisted of small, unrepresentative sample populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary studies favor DT as an effective management strategy for behavioral symptoms of MNCD. However, the few existing randomized controlled trials are limited in size and demographics. Further research involving larger, more diverse study samples with more male patients is needed. Additionally, the exact parameters to guide this therapy have not been established and require investigative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50770,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"33 1","pages":"58-66"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doll therapy in dementia: Facts and controversies.\",\"authors\":\"Kala Chinnaswamy,&nbsp;Dominic M DeMarco,&nbsp;George T Grossberg\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/acp.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD), formerly known as dementia, is of increasing concern as the elderly population continues to grow. Doll therapy (DT) is a controversial method observed in clinical practice that has both promising benefits and potential ethical concerns. To date, little research has been done on this therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PubMed search was performed using the keywords \\\"dementia,\\\" \\\"elderly,\\\" \\\"dolls,\\\" \\\"doll therapy,\\\" and \\\"Alzheimer's disease.\\\" A list of pertinent articles was assembled, with irrelevant articles excluded. References from these articles were also reviewed and additional articles were included in the final list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Research on the utility of DT for patients with MNCD is limited. Current literature suggests that DT may be beneficial in decreasing the use of pharmacologic interventions and alleviating symptoms such as agitation and anxiety. However, most studies consisted of small, unrepresentative sample populations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preliminary studies favor DT as an effective management strategy for behavioral symptoms of MNCD. However, the few existing randomized controlled trials are limited in size and demographics. Further research involving larger, more diverse study samples with more male patients is needed. Additionally, the exact parameters to guide this therapy have not been established and require investigative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"58-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/acp.0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:随着老年人口的持续增长,重大神经认知障碍(MNCD)的治疗日益受到关注。娃娃疗法(DT)是临床实践中观察到的一种有争议的方法,既有希望的好处,也有潜在的伦理问题。到目前为止,关于这种疗法的研究还很少。方法:使用关键词“痴呆”、“老年”、“玩偶”、“玩偶疗法”和“阿尔茨海默病”进行PubMed搜索。汇集了一份相关文章的清单,不包括不相关的文章。还审查了这些文章的参考文献,并将其他文章列入最终清单。结果:关于DT对MNCD患者效用的研究有限。目前的文献表明,DT可能有助于减少药物干预的使用,减轻躁动和焦虑等症状。然而,大多数研究都是由小的、不具代表性的样本人群组成的。结论:初步研究支持DT作为MNCD行为症状的有效管理策略。然而,现有的少数随机对照试验在规模和人口统计学上是有限的。需要进一步的研究,包括更大、更多样化的研究样本和更多的男性患者。此外,指导这种治疗的确切参数尚未确定,需要调查研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Doll therapy in dementia: Facts and controversies.

Background: The management of major neurocognitive disorder (MNCD), formerly known as dementia, is of increasing concern as the elderly population continues to grow. Doll therapy (DT) is a controversial method observed in clinical practice that has both promising benefits and potential ethical concerns. To date, little research has been done on this therapy.

Methods: A PubMed search was performed using the keywords "dementia," "elderly," "dolls," "doll therapy," and "Alzheimer's disease." A list of pertinent articles was assembled, with irrelevant articles excluded. References from these articles were also reviewed and additional articles were included in the final list.

Results: Research on the utility of DT for patients with MNCD is limited. Current literature suggests that DT may be beneficial in decreasing the use of pharmacologic interventions and alleviating symptoms such as agitation and anxiety. However, most studies consisted of small, unrepresentative sample populations.

Conclusions: Preliminary studies favor DT as an effective management strategy for behavioral symptoms of MNCD. However, the few existing randomized controlled trials are limited in size and demographics. Further research involving larger, more diverse study samples with more male patients is needed. Additionally, the exact parameters to guide this therapy have not been established and require investigative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ANNALS publishes up-to-date information regarding the diagnosis and /or treatment of persons with mental disorders. Preferred manuscripts are those that report the results of controlled clinical trials, timely and thorough evidence-based reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports that present new appraisals of pertinent clinical topics.
期刊最新文献
Posttraumatic stress disorder comorbidity in patients undergoing ECT for major depressive disorder. Clinical characteristics of trichotillomania. Development of a mobile monitoring program for anxiety and depression in pregnancy and evaluation of 3-month results. Problematic internet use and suicidal behavior in adolescents: A review. Protest behaviors among patients placed in seclusion in a psychiatric emergency service.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1