当前报告和解释抗核抗体间接免疫荧光(ANA IIF)模式的实验室和临床实践:一项国际调查的结果。

Q1 Medicine Auto-Immunity Highlights Pub Date : 2020-11-23 DOI:10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9
Lieve Van Hoovels, Sylvia Broeders, Edward K L Chan, Luis Andrade, Wilson de Melo Cruvinel, Jan Damoiseaux, Markku Viander, Manfred Herold, Wim Coucke, Ingmar Heijnen, Dimitrios Bogdanos, Jaime Calvo-Alén, Catharina Eriksson, Ana Kozmar, Liisa Kuhi, Carolien Bonroy, Bernard Lauwerys, Sofie Schouwers, Laurence Lutteri, Martine Vercammen, Miroslav Mayer, Dina Patel, William Egner, Kari Puolakka, Andrea Tesija-Kuna, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Maria José Rego de Sousa, Marcos Lopez Hoyos, Antonella Radice, Xavier Bossuyt
{"title":"当前报告和解释抗核抗体间接免疫荧光(ANA IIF)模式的实验室和临床实践:一项国际调查的结果。","authors":"Lieve Van Hoovels,&nbsp;Sylvia Broeders,&nbsp;Edward K L Chan,&nbsp;Luis Andrade,&nbsp;Wilson de Melo Cruvinel,&nbsp;Jan Damoiseaux,&nbsp;Markku Viander,&nbsp;Manfred Herold,&nbsp;Wim Coucke,&nbsp;Ingmar Heijnen,&nbsp;Dimitrios Bogdanos,&nbsp;Jaime Calvo-Alén,&nbsp;Catharina Eriksson,&nbsp;Ana Kozmar,&nbsp;Liisa Kuhi,&nbsp;Carolien Bonroy,&nbsp;Bernard Lauwerys,&nbsp;Sofie Schouwers,&nbsp;Laurence Lutteri,&nbsp;Martine Vercammen,&nbsp;Miroslav Mayer,&nbsp;Dina Patel,&nbsp;William Egner,&nbsp;Kari Puolakka,&nbsp;Andrea Tesija-Kuna,&nbsp;Yehuda Shoenfeld,&nbsp;Maria José Rego de Sousa,&nbsp;Marcos Lopez Hoyos,&nbsp;Antonella Radice,&nbsp;Xavier Bossuyt","doi":"10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.</p>","PeriodicalId":8655,"journal":{"name":"Auto-Immunity Highlights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey.\",\"authors\":\"Lieve Van Hoovels,&nbsp;Sylvia Broeders,&nbsp;Edward K L Chan,&nbsp;Luis Andrade,&nbsp;Wilson de Melo Cruvinel,&nbsp;Jan Damoiseaux,&nbsp;Markku Viander,&nbsp;Manfred Herold,&nbsp;Wim Coucke,&nbsp;Ingmar Heijnen,&nbsp;Dimitrios Bogdanos,&nbsp;Jaime Calvo-Alén,&nbsp;Catharina Eriksson,&nbsp;Ana Kozmar,&nbsp;Liisa Kuhi,&nbsp;Carolien Bonroy,&nbsp;Bernard Lauwerys,&nbsp;Sofie Schouwers,&nbsp;Laurence Lutteri,&nbsp;Martine Vercammen,&nbsp;Miroslav Mayer,&nbsp;Dina Patel,&nbsp;William Egner,&nbsp;Kari Puolakka,&nbsp;Andrea Tesija-Kuna,&nbsp;Yehuda Shoenfeld,&nbsp;Maria José Rego de Sousa,&nbsp;Marcos Lopez Hoyos,&nbsp;Antonella Radice,&nbsp;Xavier Bossuyt\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auto-Immunity Highlights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auto-Immunity Highlights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auto-Immunity Highlights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:国际共识抗核抗体(ANA)模式(ICAP)最近提出了命名法,以协调ANA间接免疫荧光(IIF)模式报告。ICAP将胜任级模式与专家级模式区分开来。组织了一项调查,以评估报告,熟悉程度,并考虑到ANA IIF模式的临床价值。方法:由欧洲自身免疫标准化倡议(EASI)工作组、国际ANA模式共识(ICAP)和英国NEQAS向实验室专业人员和临床医生分发两份调查。结果:来自67个国家的438名实验室专业人员和248名临床医生参与了调查。除致密细斑(DFS)外,> 85%的实验室报告了核胜任模式。除杆状和环状外,72%以上的实验室报告了细胞质的能态模式。55%的临床医生和62%的实验室专业人员认为细胞质IIF染色为ANA阳性,存在地理和专业知识相关差异。定量荧光强度被认为与临床核模式相关,但与细胞质和有丝分裂模式不太相关。将IIF与特异性可提取核抗原(ENA)/dsDNA抗体检测相结合被认为是最具信息量的。在核活性模式中,着丝粒和均匀模式的临床相关性得分最高,而DFS模式的临床相关性得分最低。在细胞质模式中,网状/线粒体样模式的临床相关性得分最高,而极性/高尔基样模式和杆状和环状模式的临床相关性得分最低。结论:这项调查证实了主要的核和细胞质ANA IIF模式被认为是临床重要的。将DFS、棒状和环状以及极性/高尔基样分类为合格模式以及将细胞质模式报告为ANA IIF阳性尚无一致意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns: results of an international survey.

Background: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns.

Methods: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians.

Results: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest.

Conclusion: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential clinical biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis with an omic approach. Effect of janus kinase inhibitors and methotrexate combination on malignancy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Short-chain fatty acids and intestinal inflammation in multiple sclerosis: modulation of female susceptibility by microbial products? Endogenous mitochondrial double-stranded RNA is not an activator of the type I interferon response in human pancreatic beta cells. Sustained clinical remission under infliximab/rituximab combination therapy in a patient with granulomatosis with polyangiitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1