盐酸依培立松和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗急性非特异性腰痛伴肌肉痉挛的疗效:一项前瞻性、开放标签研究

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2020-11-16 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S278467
Rizaldy Taslim Pinzon, Vincent Ongko Wijaya, Dessy Paramitha, Raymondus Rangga Bagaskara
{"title":"盐酸依培立松和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗急性非特异性腰痛伴肌肉痉挛的疗效:一项前瞻性、开放标签研究","authors":"Rizaldy Taslim Pinzon,&nbsp;Vincent Ongko Wijaya,&nbsp;Dessy Paramitha,&nbsp;Raymondus Rangga Bagaskara","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S278467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) occurs as a common condition and may harm the patient's quality-of-life. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and eperisone form a drug regiment that has been reported as effective in improving low back pain, yet the evidence for its efficacy and safety is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of eperisone hydrochloride and ibuprofen compared with ibuprofen alone in reducing symptoms of patients with acute non-specific back pain with a muscle spasm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an open-label, prospective study involving 100 subjects with symptoms of back pain and muscle spasm. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to an experimental group (54 patients) and a control group (46 patients). The experimental group received eperisone 50 mg three times daily + ibuprofen 400 mg twice daily, and the control group received ibuprofen 400 mg twice daily over a 4-week duration. The primary outcomes were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS), and finger-to-floor (FTF) distance at baseline, week 2, and week 4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 4 weeks of follow-up, results from 59 subjects were collected. In both groups, VAS and FTF were decreased compared to baseline. Clinically significant pain reduction (>50% than baseline) was observed to be higher in the experimental group compared with the control group in the fourth week (72.4% vs 46.7%, <i>P</i><0.05). At the end of the study, pain reduction in the experimental group was more significant compared to the control group (28.13±24.72 vs 34.42±28.47) and participants mobility (FTF distance <10 cm) improved in both groups, especially in the experimental group (75.9% vs 70%). There was no difference in adverse events between groups (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of eperisone hydrochloride and ibuprofen effectively reduces pain and improves functional outcomes over ibuprofen alone with a similar safety profile in these patients with acute non-specific back pain with muscle spasm.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":"12 ","pages":"221-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/DHPS.S278467","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Eperisone Hydrochloride and Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for Acute Non-Specific Back Pain with Muscle Spasm: A Prospective, Open-Label Study.\",\"authors\":\"Rizaldy Taslim Pinzon,&nbsp;Vincent Ongko Wijaya,&nbsp;Dessy Paramitha,&nbsp;Raymondus Rangga Bagaskara\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DHPS.S278467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) occurs as a common condition and may harm the patient's quality-of-life. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and eperisone form a drug regiment that has been reported as effective in improving low back pain, yet the evidence for its efficacy and safety is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of eperisone hydrochloride and ibuprofen compared with ibuprofen alone in reducing symptoms of patients with acute non-specific back pain with a muscle spasm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was an open-label, prospective study involving 100 subjects with symptoms of back pain and muscle spasm. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to an experimental group (54 patients) and a control group (46 patients). The experimental group received eperisone 50 mg three times daily + ibuprofen 400 mg twice daily, and the control group received ibuprofen 400 mg twice daily over a 4-week duration. The primary outcomes were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS), and finger-to-floor (FTF) distance at baseline, week 2, and week 4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 4 weeks of follow-up, results from 59 subjects were collected. In both groups, VAS and FTF were decreased compared to baseline. Clinically significant pain reduction (>50% than baseline) was observed to be higher in the experimental group compared with the control group in the fourth week (72.4% vs 46.7%, <i>P</i><0.05). At the end of the study, pain reduction in the experimental group was more significant compared to the control group (28.13±24.72 vs 34.42±28.47) and participants mobility (FTF distance <10 cm) improved in both groups, especially in the experimental group (75.9% vs 70%). There was no difference in adverse events between groups (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of eperisone hydrochloride and ibuprofen effectively reduces pain and improves functional outcomes over ibuprofen alone with a similar safety profile in these patients with acute non-specific back pain with muscle spasm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"221-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/DHPS.S278467\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S278467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S278467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:腰痛(LBP)是一种常见的疾病,可能会影响患者的生活质量。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和依培力松组成了一个药物团,已被报道为有效改善腰痛,但其有效性和安全性的证据缺乏。目的:本研究的目的是评价盐酸依培立松和布洛芬在减轻急性非特异性背部疼痛并肌肉痉挛患者症状方面的效果,并与单独使用布洛芬进行比较。方法:这是一项开放标签的前瞻性研究,涉及100名有背痛和肌肉痉挛症状的受试者。符合条件的参与者被随机分配到实验组(54例)和对照组(46例)。实验组给予依培力松50 mg,每日3次+布洛芬400 mg,每日2次,对照组给予布洛芬400 mg,每日2次,疗程4周。主要结果在基线、第2周和第4周用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和手指到地板的距离(FTF)来测量。结果:随访4周,共收集59例受试者的结果。两组的VAS和FTF均较基线降低。第4周,实验组临床显著性疼痛减轻率(大于基线50%)高于对照组(72.4% vs 46.7%, PP>0.05)。结论:与布洛芬单用相比,盐酸依培立松联合布洛芬可有效减轻急性非特异性腰痛伴肌肉痉挛患者的疼痛,改善功能预后,且安全性相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Eperisone Hydrochloride and Non-Steroid Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for Acute Non-Specific Back Pain with Muscle Spasm: A Prospective, Open-Label Study.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) occurs as a common condition and may harm the patient's quality-of-life. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and eperisone form a drug regiment that has been reported as effective in improving low back pain, yet the evidence for its efficacy and safety is lacking.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of eperisone hydrochloride and ibuprofen compared with ibuprofen alone in reducing symptoms of patients with acute non-specific back pain with a muscle spasm.

Methods: This was an open-label, prospective study involving 100 subjects with symptoms of back pain and muscle spasm. Eligible participants were randomly allocated to an experimental group (54 patients) and a control group (46 patients). The experimental group received eperisone 50 mg three times daily + ibuprofen 400 mg twice daily, and the control group received ibuprofen 400 mg twice daily over a 4-week duration. The primary outcomes were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS), and finger-to-floor (FTF) distance at baseline, week 2, and week 4.

Results: After 4 weeks of follow-up, results from 59 subjects were collected. In both groups, VAS and FTF were decreased compared to baseline. Clinically significant pain reduction (>50% than baseline) was observed to be higher in the experimental group compared with the control group in the fourth week (72.4% vs 46.7%, P<0.05). At the end of the study, pain reduction in the experimental group was more significant compared to the control group (28.13±24.72 vs 34.42±28.47) and participants mobility (FTF distance <10 cm) improved in both groups, especially in the experimental group (75.9% vs 70%). There was no difference in adverse events between groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of eperisone hydrochloride and ibuprofen effectively reduces pain and improves functional outcomes over ibuprofen alone with a similar safety profile in these patients with acute non-specific back pain with muscle spasm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Heart Failure Patient with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: Single Center Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Response to Letter]. Baloxavir Resistance Markers in Influenza A and B Viruses in the Americas. Adverse Events Following Immunization with Novel Oral Polio Vaccine Type 2, and the Experience and Challenges of Reporting in Sierra Leone [Letter]. Adverse Drug Reactions Related with Antibiotic Medicines in Malawi: A Retrospective Analysis of Prevalence and Associated Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1