两种商业和一种室内实时PCR检测方法诊断细菌性胃肠炎的比较。

Konstantin Tanida, Andreas Hahn, Hagen Frickmann
{"title":"两种商业和一种室内实时PCR检测方法诊断细菌性胃肠炎的比较。","authors":"Konstantin Tanida,&nbsp;Andreas Hahn,&nbsp;Hagen Frickmann","doi":"10.1556/1886.2020.00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of in-house real-time PCR and commercial real-time PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics (FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen) targeting enteropathogenic bacteria from stool in preparation of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both 241 stool samples from patients and 100 samples from German laboratory control schemes (\"Ringversuche\") were used to comparatively assess in-house real-time PCR, the FTD bacterial gastroenteritis kit, and the ampliCube gastrointestinal bacterial panels 1&2 either with the in-house PCRs as gold standard and as a test comparison without gold standard applying latent class analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-assay variation and Cohen's kappa were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison with the gold standard, sensitivity was 75-100% for strongly positive samples, 20-100% for weakly positive samples, and specificity ranged from 96 to 100%. Latent class analysis suggested that sensitivity ranges from 81.2 to 100% and specificity from 58.5 to 100%. Cohen's kappa varied between moderate and nearly perfect agreement, intra- and inter-assay variation was 1-3 to 1-4 Ct values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acceptable agreement and performance characteristics suggested replaceability of the in-house PCR assays by the commercial approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":11929,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","volume":"10 4","pages":"210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/4f/eujmi-10-210.PMC7753976.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Tanida,&nbsp;Andreas Hahn,&nbsp;Hagen Frickmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/1886.2020.00030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of in-house real-time PCR and commercial real-time PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics (FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen) targeting enteropathogenic bacteria from stool in preparation of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Both 241 stool samples from patients and 100 samples from German laboratory control schemes (\\\"Ringversuche\\\") were used to comparatively assess in-house real-time PCR, the FTD bacterial gastroenteritis kit, and the ampliCube gastrointestinal bacterial panels 1&2 either with the in-house PCRs as gold standard and as a test comparison without gold standard applying latent class analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-assay variation and Cohen's kappa were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison with the gold standard, sensitivity was 75-100% for strongly positive samples, 20-100% for weakly positive samples, and specificity ranged from 96 to 100%. Latent class analysis suggested that sensitivity ranges from 81.2 to 100% and specificity from 58.5 to 100%. Cohen's kappa varied between moderate and nearly perfect agreement, intra- and inter-assay variation was 1-3 to 1-4 Ct values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Acceptable agreement and performance characteristics suggested replaceability of the in-house PCR assays by the commercial approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"210-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/4f/eujmi-10-210.PMC7753976.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2020.00030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2020.00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

该研究的目的是比较评估内部实时PCR和商业实时PCR(快速通道诊断(FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen)针对粪便中的肠致病性细菌,为体外诊断医疗器械法规(EU) 2017/746做准备。方法:采用241份患者粪便样本和100份来自德国实验室对照方案(“Ringversuche”)的样本,比较评估内部实时PCR、FTD细菌性肠胃炎试剂盒和ampliCube胃肠道细菌检测板1和2,分别以内部PCR作为金标准和不使用金标准的测试比较,应用潜在类分析。评估敏感性、特异性、测定内和测定间变异和Cohen’s kappa。结果:与金标准相比,强阳性样品的灵敏度为75-100%,弱阳性样品的灵敏度为20-100%,特异性为96 -100%。潜在分类分析表明,敏感性为81.2 - 100%,特异性为58.5 - 100%。Cohen’s kappa在中度和近乎完全一致之间变化,测定内和测定间的变化为1-3至1-4个Ct值。结论:可接受的一致性和性能特征表明内部PCR分析可被商业方法替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of two commercial and one in-house real-time PCR assays for the diagnosis of bacterial gastroenteritis.

Introduction: The aim of the study was a comparative evaluation of in-house real-time PCR and commercial real-time PCR (Fast Track Diagnostics (FTD), ampliCube/Mikrogen) targeting enteropathogenic bacteria from stool in preparation of Regulation (EU) 2017/746 on in vitro diagnostic medical devices.

Methods: Both 241 stool samples from patients and 100 samples from German laboratory control schemes ("Ringversuche") were used to comparatively assess in-house real-time PCR, the FTD bacterial gastroenteritis kit, and the ampliCube gastrointestinal bacterial panels 1&2 either with the in-house PCRs as gold standard and as a test comparison without gold standard applying latent class analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-assay variation and Cohen's kappa were assessed.

Results: In comparison with the gold standard, sensitivity was 75-100% for strongly positive samples, 20-100% for weakly positive samples, and specificity ranged from 96 to 100%. Latent class analysis suggested that sensitivity ranges from 81.2 to 100% and specificity from 58.5 to 100%. Cohen's kappa varied between moderate and nearly perfect agreement, intra- and inter-assay variation was 1-3 to 1-4 Ct values.

Conclusion: Acceptable agreement and performance characteristics suggested replaceability of the in-house PCR assays by the commercial approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
17th International Congress on Toxoplasmosis (ToxoXVII) Berlin, Germany, May 26th–29th 2024 The impact of ketogenic diet on the onset and progression of multiple sclerosis. Not only for Christmas: Prophylactic oral application of trans-cinnamaldehyde alleviates acute murine campylobacteriosis. Phytochemicals and micronutrients in suppressing infectivity caused by SARS-CoV-2 virions and seasonal coronavirus HCoV-229E in vivo. Performance of MassARRAY system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 compared to real-time PCR.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1