Alexander L Williams, Michelle G Craske, Susan Mineka, Richard E Zinbarg
{"title":"大龄青少年神经质与焦虑抑郁症状的纵向轨迹。","authors":"Alexander L Williams, Michelle G Craske, Susan Mineka, Richard E Zinbarg","doi":"10.1037/abn0000638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by remarkable volatility and comorbidity in internalizing disorders. Delineating internalizing symptom change in a manner that accounts for symptoms' shared versus distinctive features is imperative to an understanding of their development. An additional question concerns how vulnerabilities for internalizing disorders relate to development of internalizing symptoms. Cross-sectional and prospective associations between neuroticism and internalizing psychopathology are well-established, yet conclusive evidence on neuroticism's relation to the progression of symptom dimensions relevant to internalizing disorders remains absent. In this investigation, we used latent growth curve modeling to characterize the trajectories of tri-level model internalizing dimensions (General Distress, Anhedonia-Apprehension, Fears, Anxious Arousal, Fears of Specific Stimuli, Social Fears, Narrow Depression, Interoceptive/Agoraphobic Fears) and examined whether a general neuroticism factor predicted their growth. We used anxiety and depressive symptom data spanning 6 years, collected from 606 high school juniors mostly vulnerable for internalizing disorders. We observed a pattern of results that varied by symptom dimension. Only Anhedonia-Apprehension showed a distinct increasing trend, on average. Neuroticism predicted an adverse symptom course for the dimension of General Distress. Our results reinforce the notion that neuroticism confers substantial risk for internalizing symptom maintenance and extend past findings by demonstrating that neuroticism forecasts a poor symptom course for General Distress but not narrower dimensions of internalizing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":14793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of abnormal psychology","volume":"130 2","pages":"126-140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroticism and the longitudinal trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms in older adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander L Williams, Michelle G Craske, Susan Mineka, Richard E Zinbarg\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0000638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by remarkable volatility and comorbidity in internalizing disorders. Delineating internalizing symptom change in a manner that accounts for symptoms' shared versus distinctive features is imperative to an understanding of their development. An additional question concerns how vulnerabilities for internalizing disorders relate to development of internalizing symptoms. Cross-sectional and prospective associations between neuroticism and internalizing psychopathology are well-established, yet conclusive evidence on neuroticism's relation to the progression of symptom dimensions relevant to internalizing disorders remains absent. In this investigation, we used latent growth curve modeling to characterize the trajectories of tri-level model internalizing dimensions (General Distress, Anhedonia-Apprehension, Fears, Anxious Arousal, Fears of Specific Stimuli, Social Fears, Narrow Depression, Interoceptive/Agoraphobic Fears) and examined whether a general neuroticism factor predicted their growth. We used anxiety and depressive symptom data spanning 6 years, collected from 606 high school juniors mostly vulnerable for internalizing disorders. We observed a pattern of results that varied by symptom dimension. Only Anhedonia-Apprehension showed a distinct increasing trend, on average. Neuroticism predicted an adverse symptom course for the dimension of General Distress. Our results reinforce the notion that neuroticism confers substantial risk for internalizing symptom maintenance and extend past findings by demonstrating that neuroticism forecasts a poor symptom course for General Distress but not narrower dimensions of internalizing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of abnormal psychology\",\"volume\":\"130 2\",\"pages\":\"126-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of abnormal psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000638\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of abnormal psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000638","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
摘要
青春期是一个发育时期,其特点是显著的波动性和内化障碍的合并症。以一种解释症状的共同特征和独特特征的方式描述内化症状变化对于理解其发展是必不可少的。另一个问题涉及内化障碍的脆弱性与内化症状的发展之间的关系。神经过敏症和内化精神病理之间的横断面和前瞻性关联已得到证实,但仍缺乏关于神经过敏症与内化障碍相关症状维度进展之间关系的确凿证据。在本研究中,我们使用潜在增长曲线模型来表征三层次模型内化维度(一般焦虑、快感缺失-恐惧、恐惧、焦虑唤醒、特定刺激恐惧、社会恐惧、狭窄抑郁、内感受性/广场恐惧)的轨迹,并检验一般神经质因素是否预测了它们的增长。我们使用了606年的焦虑和抑郁症状数据,这些数据来自606名最容易出现内化障碍的初中生。我们观察到不同症状维度的结果模式。平均而言,只有快感缺乏-恐惧表现出明显的上升趋势。神经质预示了一般窘迫维度的不良症状过程。我们的研究结果强化了神经质给内化症状维持带来巨大风险的概念,并扩展了过去的研究结果,证明神经质预示着一般窘迫的不良症状病程,但内化的狭窄维度却没有。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
Neuroticism and the longitudinal trajectories of anxiety and depressive symptoms in older adolescents.
Adolescence is a developmental period characterized by remarkable volatility and comorbidity in internalizing disorders. Delineating internalizing symptom change in a manner that accounts for symptoms' shared versus distinctive features is imperative to an understanding of their development. An additional question concerns how vulnerabilities for internalizing disorders relate to development of internalizing symptoms. Cross-sectional and prospective associations between neuroticism and internalizing psychopathology are well-established, yet conclusive evidence on neuroticism's relation to the progression of symptom dimensions relevant to internalizing disorders remains absent. In this investigation, we used latent growth curve modeling to characterize the trajectories of tri-level model internalizing dimensions (General Distress, Anhedonia-Apprehension, Fears, Anxious Arousal, Fears of Specific Stimuli, Social Fears, Narrow Depression, Interoceptive/Agoraphobic Fears) and examined whether a general neuroticism factor predicted their growth. We used anxiety and depressive symptom data spanning 6 years, collected from 606 high school juniors mostly vulnerable for internalizing disorders. We observed a pattern of results that varied by symptom dimension. Only Anhedonia-Apprehension showed a distinct increasing trend, on average. Neuroticism predicted an adverse symptom course for the dimension of General Distress. Our results reinforce the notion that neuroticism confers substantial risk for internalizing symptom maintenance and extend past findings by demonstrating that neuroticism forecasts a poor symptom course for General Distress but not narrower dimensions of internalizing. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Abnormal Psychology® publishes articles on basic research and theory in the broad field of abnormal behavior, its determinants, and its correlates. The following general topics fall within its area of major focus: - psychopathology—its etiology, development, symptomatology, and course; - normal processes in abnormal individuals; - pathological or atypical features of the behavior of normal persons; - experimental studies, with human or animal subjects, relating to disordered emotional behavior or pathology; - sociocultural effects on pathological processes, including the influence of gender and ethnicity; and - tests of hypotheses from psychological theories that relate to abnormal behavior.