更均匀地分配acgme授权的病例,提高了居民对公平和平衡的看法。

Lauren K Buhl, Ala Nozari
{"title":"更均匀地分配acgme授权的病例,提高了居民对公平和平衡的看法。","authors":"Lauren K Buhl,&nbsp;Ala Nozari","doi":"10.46374/volxxii-issue4-buhl","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates minimum numbers of cases in many specialties, including anesthesiology, but resident scheduling is often done on the basis of time spent on each rotation rather the number of opportunities for specific cases, risking uneven case distribution, particularly for low-volume cases. We used the neuroanesthesia rotation as a model to evaluate a system to more evenly distribute ACGME-mandated cases among residents and assessed the effects on their perceptions of their experience on the rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In November 2018, we instituted a targeted operating room scheduling system at our institution by making specific daily assignment requests for anesthesia residents on the neuroanesthesia rotation. We used Shewhart control charts to analyze the variation in case distribution among all resident rotations (N = 91) from January 2018 to October 2019. We then surveyed residents who had experienced both systems (n = 15) and those who had experienced only the old system (n = 16).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shewhart p-charts of the proportion of ACGME-mandated cases assigned to each resident showed wide variation under the old scheduling system and a more even distribution under the new system. Residents reported significantly greater perceived fairness of case distribution and balance between their education and service obligations under the new system (response rates: 10/16 [62.5%] and 13/15 [86.7%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeted resident scheduling based on ACGME-mandated case numbers rather than solely time spent on a rotation is feasible and can improve resident perceptions of fairness and balance between education and service, a top priority of the ACGME.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"22 4","pages":"E649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792562/pdf/i2333-0406-22-4-buhl.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Even Distribution of ACGME-mandated Cases Improves Residents' Perceptions of Fairness and Balance.\",\"authors\":\"Lauren K Buhl,&nbsp;Ala Nozari\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxii-issue4-buhl\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates minimum numbers of cases in many specialties, including anesthesiology, but resident scheduling is often done on the basis of time spent on each rotation rather the number of opportunities for specific cases, risking uneven case distribution, particularly for low-volume cases. We used the neuroanesthesia rotation as a model to evaluate a system to more evenly distribute ACGME-mandated cases among residents and assessed the effects on their perceptions of their experience on the rotation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In November 2018, we instituted a targeted operating room scheduling system at our institution by making specific daily assignment requests for anesthesia residents on the neuroanesthesia rotation. We used Shewhart control charts to analyze the variation in case distribution among all resident rotations (N = 91) from January 2018 to October 2019. We then surveyed residents who had experienced both systems (n = 15) and those who had experienced only the old system (n = 16).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Shewhart p-charts of the proportion of ACGME-mandated cases assigned to each resident showed wide variation under the old scheduling system and a more even distribution under the new system. Residents reported significantly greater perceived fairness of case distribution and balance between their education and service obligations under the new system (response rates: 10/16 [62.5%] and 13/15 [86.7%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Targeted resident scheduling based on ACGME-mandated case numbers rather than solely time spent on a rotation is feasible and can improve resident perceptions of fairness and balance between education and service, a top priority of the ACGME.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"E649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792562/pdf/i2333-0406-22-4-buhl.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii-issue4-buhl\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii-issue4-buhl","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)规定了包括麻醉学在内的许多专业的最低病例数,但住院医师的安排通常是根据每次轮转所花费的时间而不是具体病例的机会数量来完成的,这有可能导致病例分布不均匀,特别是对于小数量的病例。我们使用神经麻醉轮转作为模型来评估一个系统,以更均匀地在住院医师中分配acgme授权的病例,并评估他们对轮转经验的看法的影响。方法:2018年11月,我们在我院建立了有针对性的手术室调度系统,对神经麻醉轮转的麻醉住院医师提出了具体的日常分配要求。我们使用Shewhart控制图分析2018年1月至2019年10月所有住院轮换(N = 91)的病例分布变化。然后,我们调查了两种系统都经历过的居民(n = 15)和那些只经历过旧系统的居民(n = 16)。结果:分配给每位住院医师的acgme授权病例比例的Shewhart p图显示,在旧的调度系统下变化很大,而在新系统下分布更均匀。居民报告说,在新制度下,他们对案件分配的公平性和教育与服务义务之间的平衡有了显著提高(回复率:10/16[62.5%]和13/15[86.7%])。结论:基于ACGME授权的病例数而不是仅仅是轮转时间的有针对性的住院医生安排是可行的,可以提高住院医生对教育和服务之间的公平和平衡的看法,这是ACGME的重中之重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
More Even Distribution of ACGME-mandated Cases Improves Residents' Perceptions of Fairness and Balance.

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) mandates minimum numbers of cases in many specialties, including anesthesiology, but resident scheduling is often done on the basis of time spent on each rotation rather the number of opportunities for specific cases, risking uneven case distribution, particularly for low-volume cases. We used the neuroanesthesia rotation as a model to evaluate a system to more evenly distribute ACGME-mandated cases among residents and assessed the effects on their perceptions of their experience on the rotation.

Methods: In November 2018, we instituted a targeted operating room scheduling system at our institution by making specific daily assignment requests for anesthesia residents on the neuroanesthesia rotation. We used Shewhart control charts to analyze the variation in case distribution among all resident rotations (N = 91) from January 2018 to October 2019. We then surveyed residents who had experienced both systems (n = 15) and those who had experienced only the old system (n = 16).

Results: Shewhart p-charts of the proportion of ACGME-mandated cases assigned to each resident showed wide variation under the old scheduling system and a more even distribution under the new system. Residents reported significantly greater perceived fairness of case distribution and balance between their education and service obligations under the new system (response rates: 10/16 [62.5%] and 13/15 [86.7%]).

Conclusions: Targeted resident scheduling based on ACGME-mandated case numbers rather than solely time spent on a rotation is feasible and can improve resident perceptions of fairness and balance between education and service, a top priority of the ACGME.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1