近端指间关节的新方法:外侧斜切口--一项回顾性队列研究。

Scars, burns & healing Pub Date : 2020-12-28 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2059513120981941
Tomas J Saun, Jessica L Truong, Romy Ahluwalia, Robert R Richards
{"title":"近端指间关节的新方法:外侧斜切口--一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Tomas J Saun, Jessica L Truong, Romy Ahluwalia, Robert R Richards","doi":"10.1177/2059513120981941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical approach to the volar structures in the digits must be designed to provide adequate exposure of tendons, vessels and nerves but also in a way that prevents flexion contracture of the digit as the scar contracts. This is traditionally done using a zigzag 'Bruner' incision, first described by Dr Julian M Bruner in 1967. In this paper, we describe an alternative approach, the Volar Oblique incision, and present a single institutional cohort of patients who have undergone procedures beginning with this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed on eight cases that involved a Bruner incision and eight similar cases that involved a volar oblique incision. Charts were reviewed for demographic data. Patients were asked to return to clinic postoperatively for scar assessment using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), where lower scores correspond to more favourable scar characteristics. The average follow-up period was 22 months. While in clinic, standard joint measurements were taken to assess for any proximal interphalangeal joint contracture. Demographics and questionnaire data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data and quantitative joint measurements were analysed using Student's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in flexion contracture between the two groups. The POSAS patient score for scar irregularity was lower in the volar oblique group compared to the Bruner group, but there was no difference in any of the other subcategories, the total patient score, nor the overall patient opinion. The total POSAS observer score was lower in the volar oblique group compared to the Bruner group, with lower scores in the scar thickness, observed relief and observed pliability subcategories as well as the overall observer opinion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The volar oblique incision appears to be satisfactory alternative to the classic Bruner incision in hand surgery that requires volar exposure of the digits. Future studies are needed to assess the validity of these findings on a larger scale.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>There are various types of incisions that surgeons use when they operate on fingers. When choosing an incision, it is important that the incision provides good exposure to the deeper structures but does not form a tight scar that limits movement of the finger (contracture).A commonly used incision for the palmar side of the finger is the zig-zag or 'Bruner' incision. Some people, however, find this zig-zag scar unappealing. We started using a single diagonal incision, which we have called the volar oblique, instead of the zig-zag Bruner for access to the middle joint of the finger. We wanted to describe the volar oblique technique and then compare the quality of these two scars and also assess if one limits movement of the finger more than the other.Our research found no differences in finger contracture between groups. We did, however, find that patients reported scar irregularity more favourably in the volar oblique group and that surgeons rated scar thickness, relief (roughness) and pliability of the volar oblique scar higher than that of the zig-zag Bruner scar.This research presents a novel surgical technique and compares its results with respect to scar quality and finger contracture to the more traditional zig-zag Bruner approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":21495,"journal":{"name":"Scars, burns & healing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/67/10.1177_2059513120981941.PMC7780168.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel approach to the proximal interphalangeal joint: The volar oblique incision - a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Tomas J Saun, Jessica L Truong, Romy Ahluwalia, Robert R Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2059513120981941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical approach to the volar structures in the digits must be designed to provide adequate exposure of tendons, vessels and nerves but also in a way that prevents flexion contracture of the digit as the scar contracts. This is traditionally done using a zigzag 'Bruner' incision, first described by Dr Julian M Bruner in 1967. In this paper, we describe an alternative approach, the Volar Oblique incision, and present a single institutional cohort of patients who have undergone procedures beginning with this approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed on eight cases that involved a Bruner incision and eight similar cases that involved a volar oblique incision. Charts were reviewed for demographic data. Patients were asked to return to clinic postoperatively for scar assessment using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), where lower scores correspond to more favourable scar characteristics. The average follow-up period was 22 months. While in clinic, standard joint measurements were taken to assess for any proximal interphalangeal joint contracture. Demographics and questionnaire data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data and quantitative joint measurements were analysed using Student's <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in flexion contracture between the two groups. The POSAS patient score for scar irregularity was lower in the volar oblique group compared to the Bruner group, but there was no difference in any of the other subcategories, the total patient score, nor the overall patient opinion. The total POSAS observer score was lower in the volar oblique group compared to the Bruner group, with lower scores in the scar thickness, observed relief and observed pliability subcategories as well as the overall observer opinion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The volar oblique incision appears to be satisfactory alternative to the classic Bruner incision in hand surgery that requires volar exposure of the digits. Future studies are needed to assess the validity of these findings on a larger scale.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>There are various types of incisions that surgeons use when they operate on fingers. When choosing an incision, it is important that the incision provides good exposure to the deeper structures but does not form a tight scar that limits movement of the finger (contracture).A commonly used incision for the palmar side of the finger is the zig-zag or 'Bruner' incision. Some people, however, find this zig-zag scar unappealing. We started using a single diagonal incision, which we have called the volar oblique, instead of the zig-zag Bruner for access to the middle joint of the finger. We wanted to describe the volar oblique technique and then compare the quality of these two scars and also assess if one limits movement of the finger more than the other.Our research found no differences in finger contracture between groups. We did, however, find that patients reported scar irregularity more favourably in the volar oblique group and that surgeons rated scar thickness, relief (roughness) and pliability of the volar oblique scar higher than that of the zig-zag Bruner scar.This research presents a novel surgical technique and compares its results with respect to scar quality and finger contracture to the more traditional zig-zag Bruner approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/67/10.1177_2059513120981941.PMC7780168.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scars, burns & healing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120981941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scars, burns & healing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120981941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对指腹结构进行手术时,必须充分暴露肌腱、血管和神经,同时还要防止因疤痕收缩而导致指腹屈曲挛缩。传统的做法是采用 "布鲁纳 "人字形切口,该切口由 Julian M Bruner 医生于 1967 年首次描述。在本文中,我们介绍了另一种方法,即 "沃尔斜切口",并展示了采用这种方法进行手术的单个机构患者队列:方法:我们对 8 例采用布鲁纳切口的病例和 8 例采用沃尔斜切口的类似病例进行了回顾性队列研究。研究人员查阅了病历以了解人口统计学数据。要求患者术后复诊,使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)进行疤痕评估,得分越低,疤痕特征越好。平均随访时间为 22 个月。在门诊期间,对患者的关节进行了标准测量,以评估是否存在近端指间关节挛缩。人口统计学和问卷调查数据采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验进行非参数数据分析,定量关节测量数据采用 Student's t 检验进行分析:结果:两组患者在屈曲挛缩方面没有差异。与 Bruner 组相比,POSAS 患者在疤痕不规则性方面的评分在沃尔斜组较低,但在其他子类别、患者总分和患者总体意见方面均无差异。与布鲁纳组相比,沃尔斜切口组的 POSAS 观察员总分较低,在疤痕厚度、观察到的松弛度和观察到的柔韧度子类别以及观察员的总体意见方面得分也较低:结论:在需要暴露指骨外侧的手部手术中,伏侧斜切口似乎是经典布鲁纳切口的理想替代方案。今后需要进行更大规模的研究,以评估这些发现的有效性。总结:外科医生在进行手指手术时会使用各种类型的切口。在选择切口时,重要的是切口既能很好地暴露深层结构,又不会形成紧绷的疤痕,从而限制手指的活动(挛缩)。但有些人认为这种 "之 "字形疤痕不美观。我们开始使用单个对角切口,我们称之为 "伏侧斜切口",而不是 "之 "字形布鲁纳切口,以便进入手指中关节。我们想描述一下伏侧斜切技术,然后比较这两种疤痕的质量,并评估其中一种是否比另一种更限制手指的活动。不过,我们确实发现,患者更倾向于评价伏侧斜切组的疤痕不规则性,外科医生对伏侧斜切疤痕的疤痕厚度、松弛度(粗糙度)和柔韧性的评价也高于 "之 "字形布鲁纳疤痕。这项研究介绍了一种新颖的手术技术,并将其在疤痕质量和手指挛缩方面的效果与更传统的 "之 "字形布鲁纳方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A novel approach to the proximal interphalangeal joint: The volar oblique incision - a retrospective cohort study.

Background: The surgical approach to the volar structures in the digits must be designed to provide adequate exposure of tendons, vessels and nerves but also in a way that prevents flexion contracture of the digit as the scar contracts. This is traditionally done using a zigzag 'Bruner' incision, first described by Dr Julian M Bruner in 1967. In this paper, we describe an alternative approach, the Volar Oblique incision, and present a single institutional cohort of patients who have undergone procedures beginning with this approach.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on eight cases that involved a Bruner incision and eight similar cases that involved a volar oblique incision. Charts were reviewed for demographic data. Patients were asked to return to clinic postoperatively for scar assessment using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), where lower scores correspond to more favourable scar characteristics. The average follow-up period was 22 months. While in clinic, standard joint measurements were taken to assess for any proximal interphalangeal joint contracture. Demographics and questionnaire data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test for non-parametric data and quantitative joint measurements were analysed using Student's t-test.

Results: There was no difference in flexion contracture between the two groups. The POSAS patient score for scar irregularity was lower in the volar oblique group compared to the Bruner group, but there was no difference in any of the other subcategories, the total patient score, nor the overall patient opinion. The total POSAS observer score was lower in the volar oblique group compared to the Bruner group, with lower scores in the scar thickness, observed relief and observed pliability subcategories as well as the overall observer opinion.

Conclusion: The volar oblique incision appears to be satisfactory alternative to the classic Bruner incision in hand surgery that requires volar exposure of the digits. Future studies are needed to assess the validity of these findings on a larger scale.

Lay summary: There are various types of incisions that surgeons use when they operate on fingers. When choosing an incision, it is important that the incision provides good exposure to the deeper structures but does not form a tight scar that limits movement of the finger (contracture).A commonly used incision for the palmar side of the finger is the zig-zag or 'Bruner' incision. Some people, however, find this zig-zag scar unappealing. We started using a single diagonal incision, which we have called the volar oblique, instead of the zig-zag Bruner for access to the middle joint of the finger. We wanted to describe the volar oblique technique and then compare the quality of these two scars and also assess if one limits movement of the finger more than the other.Our research found no differences in finger contracture between groups. We did, however, find that patients reported scar irregularity more favourably in the volar oblique group and that surgeons rated scar thickness, relief (roughness) and pliability of the volar oblique scar higher than that of the zig-zag Bruner scar.This research presents a novel surgical technique and compares its results with respect to scar quality and finger contracture to the more traditional zig-zag Bruner approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of oral Calendula officinalis on second-degree burn wound healing. To bleed or not to bleed? Case series and discussion of haemorrhage risk with enzymatic debridement in burn injuries. An evaluation of clinical psychology input into burns multidisciplinary follow-up clinics. The efficacy of combined ultrasound and electric field stimulation therapy in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Protocol for clinical diagnosis and empiric treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis in severely burned patients: observations and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1