Rebecca T Clark, Christine M Mullins, Jean C Hemphill
{"title":"监测阿巴拉契亚农村地区两家初级保健诊所的糖尿病筛查:质量改进过程。","authors":"Rebecca T Clark, Christine M Mullins, Jean C Hemphill","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One-third of the U.S. population has prediabetes, but 90% remain undiagnosed because healthcare providers are not screening for this condition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this quality improvement project was to monitor prediabetes screening and identification, and implement evidence-based recommendations including registered dietician referral.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project involved using an evidence-based screening tool to measure individual risk of prediabetes. Aggregate data was collected to evaluate screening implementation, evidence-based recommendations offered by providers, and assess patient risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of patients at risk for prediabetes was 41.3% (<i>n</i> = 111). The most frequent risks were identified as overweight, history of hypertension, family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and older age. Providers offered education on weight loss 68.5% (<i>n</i> = 76) and exercise 76.6% (<i>n</i> = 85) but referred 33.3% (<i>n</i> = 37) patients for nutrition education. The screening rates were 52.3% (<i>n</i> = 176) and 72.5% (<i>n</i> = 244) in clinics A and B respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A gap remains in using evidence-based recommendations to decrease risk of prediabetes. Prediabetes screening identified a greater percentage of persons in this population.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>There is a need for consistent practice of evidence-based recommendations. This project set the benchmark for future efforts to educate, encourage, and measure providers successes.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring Prediabetes Screening in Two Primary Care Offices in Rural Appalachia: A Quality Improvement Process.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca T Clark, Christine M Mullins, Jean C Hemphill\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One-third of the U.S. population has prediabetes, but 90% remain undiagnosed because healthcare providers are not screening for this condition.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this quality improvement project was to monitor prediabetes screening and identification, and implement evidence-based recommendations including registered dietician referral.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project involved using an evidence-based screening tool to measure individual risk of prediabetes. Aggregate data was collected to evaluate screening implementation, evidence-based recommendations offered by providers, and assess patient risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of patients at risk for prediabetes was 41.3% (<i>n</i> = 111). The most frequent risks were identified as overweight, history of hypertension, family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and older age. Providers offered education on weight loss 68.5% (<i>n</i> = 76) and exercise 76.6% (<i>n</i> = 85) but referred 33.3% (<i>n</i> = 37) patients for nutrition education. The screening rates were 52.3% (<i>n</i> = 176) and 72.5% (<i>n</i> = 244) in clinics A and B respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A gap remains in using evidence-based recommendations to decrease risk of prediabetes. Prediabetes screening identified a greater percentage of persons in this population.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>There is a need for consistent practice of evidence-based recommendations. This project set the benchmark for future efforts to educate, encourage, and measure providers successes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monitoring Prediabetes Screening in Two Primary Care Offices in Rural Appalachia: A Quality Improvement Process.
Background: One-third of the U.S. population has prediabetes, but 90% remain undiagnosed because healthcare providers are not screening for this condition.
Objective: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to monitor prediabetes screening and identification, and implement evidence-based recommendations including registered dietician referral.
Methods: This project involved using an evidence-based screening tool to measure individual risk of prediabetes. Aggregate data was collected to evaluate screening implementation, evidence-based recommendations offered by providers, and assess patient risk factors.
Results: The percentage of patients at risk for prediabetes was 41.3% (n = 111). The most frequent risks were identified as overweight, history of hypertension, family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and older age. Providers offered education on weight loss 68.5% (n = 76) and exercise 76.6% (n = 85) but referred 33.3% (n = 37) patients for nutrition education. The screening rates were 52.3% (n = 176) and 72.5% (n = 244) in clinics A and B respectively.
Conclusions: A gap remains in using evidence-based recommendations to decrease risk of prediabetes. Prediabetes screening identified a greater percentage of persons in this population.
Implications for nursing: There is a need for consistent practice of evidence-based recommendations. This project set the benchmark for future efforts to educate, encourage, and measure providers successes.