翻转课堂,优化教学中的临床决策。

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2021-01-19 DOI:10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00050
Karen Marie Arca-Contreras
{"title":"翻转课堂,优化教学中的临床决策。","authors":"Karen Marie Arca-Contreras","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deliberate inclusion of clinical decision-making nursing skills in the didactic setting will assist students in potentially making better patient care decisions. This can be optimized through use of the flipped learning andragogy. Flipped learning promotes an interactive classroom environment. It fosters teamwork and collaboration. Direct content instruction is the responsibility of students.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cohort pilot study investigated how the flipped and nonflipped approach to teaching impacted clinical decision-making and student participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS) was administered to the students in the flipped classroom and the nonflipped classroom on week 1 and week 6. A student participation checklist was used to observe class activities at three separate intervals (baseline, mid-semester, and end-semester). A repeated measures analysis of covariance was conducted with Instruction Group as the between subjects factor (Flipped and Nonflipped) and Time (preinstruction and postinstruction) as the within subjects factor, and covarying age. The Time by the Instruction group was significant. The Flipped group showed an increase in Clinical decision-making scores (<i>p</i> < .001) after instruction while the Nonflipped group did not (<i>p</i> = .40).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Flipped group (<i>n</i> = 24) showed an increase in Clinical decision-making scores (<i>p</i> < .001) after instruction while the Nonflipped group (<i>n</i> = 23) did not (<i>p</i> = .40). The Flipped classroom showed 100% participation at baseline, mid-semester, and end of semester. The Nonflipped classroom showed overall lower levels of participation, with 42%, 33%, and 39% at each point respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications for nursing: </strong>Students who were taught using the flipped instruction were able to apply what they learned in relevant case studies, virtual simulations, and practice National Council Licensure Examination RN (NCLEX-RN) type questions. Through teamwork and collaboration, students had time to practice clinical decision-making skills. This was evident in the increased CDMNS scores and increased levels of participation over time in the flipped group when compared to the nonflipped group.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flipping the Classroom to Optimize Clinical Decision-Making in the Didactic Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Karen Marie Arca-Contreras\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deliberate inclusion of clinical decision-making nursing skills in the didactic setting will assist students in potentially making better patient care decisions. This can be optimized through use of the flipped learning andragogy. Flipped learning promotes an interactive classroom environment. It fosters teamwork and collaboration. Direct content instruction is the responsibility of students.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This cohort pilot study investigated how the flipped and nonflipped approach to teaching impacted clinical decision-making and student participation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS) was administered to the students in the flipped classroom and the nonflipped classroom on week 1 and week 6. A student participation checklist was used to observe class activities at three separate intervals (baseline, mid-semester, and end-semester). A repeated measures analysis of covariance was conducted with Instruction Group as the between subjects factor (Flipped and Nonflipped) and Time (preinstruction and postinstruction) as the within subjects factor, and covarying age. The Time by the Instruction group was significant. The Flipped group showed an increase in Clinical decision-making scores (<i>p</i> < .001) after instruction while the Nonflipped group did not (<i>p</i> = .40).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Flipped group (<i>n</i> = 24) showed an increase in Clinical decision-making scores (<i>p</i> < .001) after instruction while the Nonflipped group (<i>n</i> = 23) did not (<i>p</i> = .40). The Flipped classroom showed 100% participation at baseline, mid-semester, and end of semester. The Nonflipped classroom showed overall lower levels of participation, with 42%, 33%, and 39% at each point respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications for nursing: </strong>Students who were taught using the flipped instruction were able to apply what they learned in relevant case studies, virtual simulations, and practice National Council Licensure Examination RN (NCLEX-RN) type questions. Through teamwork and collaboration, students had time to practice clinical decision-making skills. This was evident in the increased CDMNS scores and increased levels of participation over time in the flipped group when compared to the nonflipped group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-D-20-00050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在教学中有意识地加入临床决策护理技能,将有助于学生做出更好的病人护理决策。这可以通过使用翻转学习和教学法来优化。翻转学习促进了互动的课堂环境。它能促进团队合作与协作。直接的教学内容由学生负责:这项队列试点研究调查了翻转教学法和非翻转教学法对临床决策和学生参与的影响:在第 1 周和第 6 周,对翻转课堂和非翻转课堂的学生进行了护理临床决策量表(CDMNS)测试。在三个不同的时间段(基线、学期中和学期末),使用学生参与检查表来观察课堂活动。以教学组(翻转课堂和非翻转课堂)为学科间因素,以时间(教学前和教学后)为学科内因素,以年龄为协方差因素,进行了重复测量协方差分析。教学组的时间显著。翻转教学组在教学后临床决策得分有所提高(p < .001),而非翻转教学组没有提高(p = .40):结果:翻转课堂组(n = 24)的临床决策得分在教学后有所提高(p < .001),而非翻转课堂组(n = 23)的临床决策得分没有提高(p = .40)。翻转课堂在基线、学期中和学期末的参与率均为 100%。非翻转课堂的整体参与率较低,在每个阶段分别为 42%、33% 和 39%:采用翻转式教学的学生能够将所学知识应用于相关案例研究、虚拟模拟和全国护士执照考试(NCLEX-RN)类型的练习题中。通过团队合作和协作,学生有时间练习临床决策技能。与非翻转教学组相比,随着时间的推移,翻转教学组的 CDMNS 分数和参与程度都有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Flipping the Classroom to Optimize Clinical Decision-Making in the Didactic Setting.

Background: Deliberate inclusion of clinical decision-making nursing skills in the didactic setting will assist students in potentially making better patient care decisions. This can be optimized through use of the flipped learning andragogy. Flipped learning promotes an interactive classroom environment. It fosters teamwork and collaboration. Direct content instruction is the responsibility of students.

Objective: This cohort pilot study investigated how the flipped and nonflipped approach to teaching impacted clinical decision-making and student participation.

Methods: The Clinical Decision-Making in Nursing Scale (CDMNS) was administered to the students in the flipped classroom and the nonflipped classroom on week 1 and week 6. A student participation checklist was used to observe class activities at three separate intervals (baseline, mid-semester, and end-semester). A repeated measures analysis of covariance was conducted with Instruction Group as the between subjects factor (Flipped and Nonflipped) and Time (preinstruction and postinstruction) as the within subjects factor, and covarying age. The Time by the Instruction group was significant. The Flipped group showed an increase in Clinical decision-making scores (p < .001) after instruction while the Nonflipped group did not (p = .40).

Results: The Flipped group (n = 24) showed an increase in Clinical decision-making scores (p < .001) after instruction while the Nonflipped group (n = 23) did not (p = .40). The Flipped classroom showed 100% participation at baseline, mid-semester, and end of semester. The Nonflipped classroom showed overall lower levels of participation, with 42%, 33%, and 39% at each point respectively.

Conclusion/implications for nursing: Students who were taught using the flipped instruction were able to apply what they learned in relevant case studies, virtual simulations, and practice National Council Licensure Examination RN (NCLEX-RN) type questions. Through teamwork and collaboration, students had time to practice clinical decision-making skills. This was evident in the increased CDMNS scores and increased levels of participation over time in the flipped group when compared to the nonflipped group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of a Virtual Seminar Series for Doctor of Nursing Students to Promote Advanced Nursing Practice. Effect of Cold Vapor Application on Postoperative Sore Throat, Dry Throat, and Difficulty Swallowing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Improving Person-Centered Depression Screening and Care in an Urban Faith-Based Community. Interactive Nursing Education to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding. Increasing Effective Primary Care Screenings in the U.S. Virgin Islands Department of Health Community Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1