乳房切除术后放射治疗在乳房重建:韩国放射肿瘤学组的护理模式研究。

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-16 DOI:10.3857/roj.2020.00738
Gowoon Yang, Jee Suk Chang, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Kyubo Kim, Ik Jae Lee, Won Sup Yoon, Jihye Cha, Kyu-Chan Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Sung-Ja Ahn, Boram Ha, Sun Young Lee, Dong Soo Lee, Jeongshim Lee, Sei One Shin, Yong Bae Kim
{"title":"乳房切除术后放射治疗在乳房重建:韩国放射肿瘤学组的护理模式研究。","authors":"Gowoon Yang, Jee Suk Chang, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Kyubo Kim, Ik Jae Lee, Won Sup Yoon, Jihye Cha, Kyu-Chan Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Sung-Ja Ahn, Boram Ha, Sun Young Lee, Dong Soo Lee, Jeongshim Lee, Sei One Shin, Yong Bae Kim","doi":"10.3857/roj.2020.00738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The details of breast reconstruction and radiation therapy (RT) vary between institutions; therefore, we sought to investigate the practice patterns of radiation oncologists who specialize in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified the practice patterns and inter-hospital variations from a multi-center cohort of women with breast cancer who underwent post-mastectomy RT (PMRT) to the reconstructed breast at 16 institutions between 2015 and 2016. The institutions were requested to contour the target volume and produce RT plans for one representative case with five different clinical scenarios and answer questionnaires which elicited infrastructural information. We assessed the inter-institutional variations in RT in terms of the target, normal organ delineation, and dose-volume histograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fourteen patients were included; 99% of them underwent immediate reconstruction. The most irradiated material was tissue expander (36.9%) followed by transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (23.9%) and silicone implant (12.1%). In prosthetic-based reconstruction with tissue expander, most patients received PMRT following partial deflation. Conventional fractionation and hypofractionation RT were used in 66.6% and 33.4% patients, respectively (commonest: 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions [17.5%]). Furthermore, 15.6% of the patients received boost RT and 53.5% were treated with bolus. Overall, 15 physicians responded to the questionnaires and six submitted their contours and RT plans. There was a significant variability in target delineations and RT plans between physicians, and between clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant RT following post-mastectomy reconstruction has become a common practice in Korea. The details vary significantly between institutions, which highlights an urgent need for standard protocol in this clinical setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":"38 4","pages":"236-243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/dc/roj-2020-00738.PMC7785842.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast reconstruction: a patterns of care study of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group.\",\"authors\":\"Gowoon Yang, Jee Suk Chang, Kyung Hwan Shin, Jin Ho Kim, Won Park, Haeyoung Kim, Kyubo Kim, Ik Jae Lee, Won Sup Yoon, Jihye Cha, Kyu-Chan Lee, Jin Hee Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Sung-Ja Ahn, Boram Ha, Sun Young Lee, Dong Soo Lee, Jeongshim Lee, Sei One Shin, Yong Bae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3857/roj.2020.00738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The details of breast reconstruction and radiation therapy (RT) vary between institutions; therefore, we sought to investigate the practice patterns of radiation oncologists who specialize in breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We identified the practice patterns and inter-hospital variations from a multi-center cohort of women with breast cancer who underwent post-mastectomy RT (PMRT) to the reconstructed breast at 16 institutions between 2015 and 2016. The institutions were requested to contour the target volume and produce RT plans for one representative case with five different clinical scenarios and answer questionnaires which elicited infrastructural information. We assessed the inter-institutional variations in RT in terms of the target, normal organ delineation, and dose-volume histograms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred fourteen patients were included; 99% of them underwent immediate reconstruction. The most irradiated material was tissue expander (36.9%) followed by transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (23.9%) and silicone implant (12.1%). In prosthetic-based reconstruction with tissue expander, most patients received PMRT following partial deflation. Conventional fractionation and hypofractionation RT were used in 66.6% and 33.4% patients, respectively (commonest: 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions [17.5%]). Furthermore, 15.6% of the patients received boost RT and 53.5% were treated with bolus. Overall, 15 physicians responded to the questionnaires and six submitted their contours and RT plans. There was a significant variability in target delineations and RT plans between physicians, and between clinical scenarios.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adjuvant RT following post-mastectomy reconstruction has become a common practice in Korea. The details vary significantly between institutions, which highlights an urgent need for standard protocol in this clinical setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46572,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"236-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b9/dc/roj-2020-00738.PMC7785842.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:乳房重建和放射治疗(RT)的细节因机构而异;因此,我们试图调查专门研究乳腺癌的放射肿瘤学家的实践模式。材料和方法:我们确定了2015年至2016年间在16家机构接受乳房切除术后RT (PMRT)重建乳房的乳腺癌妇女的多中心队列的实践模式和医院间差异。这些机构被要求勾画出目标体积的轮廓,并为一个具有代表性的病例提供五种不同的临床方案,并回答有关基础设施信息的问卷。我们根据靶区、正常器官描绘和剂量-体积直方图评估了RT的机构间差异。结果:共纳入314例患者;99%的患者立即接受了重建。辐照材料最多的是组织扩张器(36.9%),其次是腹直肌皮瓣(23.9%)和硅胶植入物(12.1%)。在以组织扩张器为基础的假体重建中,大多数患者在部分收缩后接受PMRT。常规分割放疗和低分割放疗分别占66.6%和33.4%(最常见:15个分割40.05 Gy[17.5%])。此外,15.6%的患者接受了增强放疗,53.5%的患者接受了丸剂治疗。总共有15名医生回答了问卷,6名医生提交了他们的轮廓和RT计划。在不同的医生和不同的临床情况之间,靶区划分和放疗计划存在显著的差异。结论:乳房切除术后重建的辅助放射治疗在韩国已成为一种普遍的做法。不同机构之间的细节差异很大,这突出了迫切需要在这种临床环境中制定标准方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-mastectomy radiation therapy in breast reconstruction: a patterns of care study of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group.

Purpose: The details of breast reconstruction and radiation therapy (RT) vary between institutions; therefore, we sought to investigate the practice patterns of radiation oncologists who specialize in breast cancer.

Materials and methods: We identified the practice patterns and inter-hospital variations from a multi-center cohort of women with breast cancer who underwent post-mastectomy RT (PMRT) to the reconstructed breast at 16 institutions between 2015 and 2016. The institutions were requested to contour the target volume and produce RT plans for one representative case with five different clinical scenarios and answer questionnaires which elicited infrastructural information. We assessed the inter-institutional variations in RT in terms of the target, normal organ delineation, and dose-volume histograms.

Results: Three hundred fourteen patients were included; 99% of them underwent immediate reconstruction. The most irradiated material was tissue expander (36.9%) followed by transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (23.9%) and silicone implant (12.1%). In prosthetic-based reconstruction with tissue expander, most patients received PMRT following partial deflation. Conventional fractionation and hypofractionation RT were used in 66.6% and 33.4% patients, respectively (commonest: 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions [17.5%]). Furthermore, 15.6% of the patients received boost RT and 53.5% were treated with bolus. Overall, 15 physicians responded to the questionnaires and six submitted their contours and RT plans. There was a significant variability in target delineations and RT plans between physicians, and between clinical scenarios.

Conclusion: Adjuvant RT following post-mastectomy reconstruction has become a common practice in Korea. The details vary significantly between institutions, which highlights an urgent need for standard protocol in this clinical setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents Different approaches to target volume definition and boost delivery in surgery de-escalation clinical trial in breast cancer patients with pathological complete response Target movement according to cervical lymph node level in head and neck cancer and its clinical significance Comparison of radiotherapy techniques in patients with thymic epithelial tumor who underwent postoperative radiotherapy Pulmonary function and toxicities of proton versus photon for limited-stage small cell lung cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1