来自CPIC和DPWG指南的药物基因组学信息及其在药物标签上的应用。

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-11 DOI:10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e18
Deok Yong Yoon, Soyoung Lee, Mu Seong Ban, In-Jin Jang, SeungHwan Lee
{"title":"来自CPIC和DPWG指南的药物基因组学信息及其在药物标签上的应用。","authors":"Deok Yong Yoon,&nbsp;Soyoung Lee,&nbsp;Mu Seong Ban,&nbsp;In-Jin Jang,&nbsp;SeungHwan Lee","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are several hurdles to overcome before implementing pharmacogenomics (PGx) in precision medicine. One of the hurdles is unawareness of PGx by clinicians due to insufficient pharmacogenomic information on drug labels. Therefore, it might be important to implement PGx that reflects pharmacogenomic information on drug labels, standard of prescription for clinicians. This study aimed to evaluate the level at which PGx was being used in clinical practice by comparing the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group guidelines and drug labels of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). Two PGx guidelines and drugs labels were scrutinized, and the concordance of the pharmacogenomic information between guidelines and drug labels was confirmed. The concordance of the label between FDA and MFDS was analyzed. In FDA labels, the number of concordant drug with guidelines was 24, while 13 drugs were concordant with MFDS labels. The number of drugs categorized as contraindication, change dose, and biomarker testing required was 7, 12 and 12 for the FDA and 8, 5 and 4 for the MFDS, respectively. The pharmacogenomic information of 9 drugs approved by both FDA and MFDS was identical. In conclusion, pharmacogenomic information on clinical implementation guidelines was limited on both FDA and MFDS labels because of various reasons including the characteristics of the guidelines and the drug labels. Therefore, more effort from pharmaceutical companies, academia and regulatory affairs needs to be made to implement pharmacogenomic information on drug labels.</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/28/tcp-28-189.PMC7781807.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacogenomic information from CPIC and DPWG guidelines and its application on drug labels.\",\"authors\":\"Deok Yong Yoon,&nbsp;Soyoung Lee,&nbsp;Mu Seong Ban,&nbsp;In-Jin Jang,&nbsp;SeungHwan Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are several hurdles to overcome before implementing pharmacogenomics (PGx) in precision medicine. One of the hurdles is unawareness of PGx by clinicians due to insufficient pharmacogenomic information on drug labels. Therefore, it might be important to implement PGx that reflects pharmacogenomic information on drug labels, standard of prescription for clinicians. This study aimed to evaluate the level at which PGx was being used in clinical practice by comparing the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group guidelines and drug labels of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). Two PGx guidelines and drugs labels were scrutinized, and the concordance of the pharmacogenomic information between guidelines and drug labels was confirmed. The concordance of the label between FDA and MFDS was analyzed. In FDA labels, the number of concordant drug with guidelines was 24, while 13 drugs were concordant with MFDS labels. The number of drugs categorized as contraindication, change dose, and biomarker testing required was 7, 12 and 12 for the FDA and 8, 5 and 4 for the MFDS, respectively. The pharmacogenomic information of 9 drugs approved by both FDA and MFDS was identical. In conclusion, pharmacogenomic information on clinical implementation guidelines was limited on both FDA and MFDS labels because of various reasons including the characteristics of the guidelines and the drug labels. Therefore, more effort from pharmaceutical companies, academia and regulatory affairs needs to be made to implement pharmacogenomic information on drug labels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/28/tcp-28-189.PMC7781807.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2020.28.e18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

在精准医学中实施药物基因组学(PGx)之前,有几个障碍需要克服。其中一个障碍是由于药物标签上的药物基因组学信息不足,临床医生对PGx的认识不足。因此,在药物标签、临床医生处方标准上实施反映药物基因组学信息的PGx可能很重要。本研究旨在通过比较临床药物遗传学实施联盟和荷兰药物遗传学工作组的指南以及美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和韩国食品药品安全部(MFDS)的药物标签,评估PGx在临床实践中的使用水平。审查了两份PGx指南和药物标签,确认了指南和药物标签之间的药物基因组学信息的一致性。分析了FDA与MFDS标签的一致性。在FDA标签中,与指南一致的药物有24种,与MFDS标签一致的药物有13种。FDA分类为禁忌症、改变剂量和生物标志物检测的药物数量分别为7种、12种和12种,MFDS分类为8种、5种和4种。FDA和MFDS批准的9种药物的药物基因组学信息相同。综上所述,由于指南和药物标签的特点等各种原因,FDA和MFDS标签上关于临床实施指南的药物基因组学信息有限。因此,在药品标签上实施药物基因组学信息需要制药公司、学术界和监管部门的更多努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacogenomic information from CPIC and DPWG guidelines and its application on drug labels.

There are several hurdles to overcome before implementing pharmacogenomics (PGx) in precision medicine. One of the hurdles is unawareness of PGx by clinicians due to insufficient pharmacogenomic information on drug labels. Therefore, it might be important to implement PGx that reflects pharmacogenomic information on drug labels, standard of prescription for clinicians. This study aimed to evaluate the level at which PGx was being used in clinical practice by comparing the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group guidelines and drug labels of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). Two PGx guidelines and drugs labels were scrutinized, and the concordance of the pharmacogenomic information between guidelines and drug labels was confirmed. The concordance of the label between FDA and MFDS was analyzed. In FDA labels, the number of concordant drug with guidelines was 24, while 13 drugs were concordant with MFDS labels. The number of drugs categorized as contraindication, change dose, and biomarker testing required was 7, 12 and 12 for the FDA and 8, 5 and 4 for the MFDS, respectively. The pharmacogenomic information of 9 drugs approved by both FDA and MFDS was identical. In conclusion, pharmacogenomic information on clinical implementation guidelines was limited on both FDA and MFDS labels because of various reasons including the characteristics of the guidelines and the drug labels. Therefore, more effort from pharmaceutical companies, academia and regulatory affairs needs to be made to implement pharmacogenomic information on drug labels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Development of in-silico drug cardiac toxicity evaluation system with consideration of inter-individual variability. Enhancing drug administration flexibility: evaluation of pharmacokinetic properties of tegoprazan orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) administered via nasogastric tube or oral dosing. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of candesartan cilexetil tablet in Chinese volunteers under fasting condition: an open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-period crossover study. Data science through natural language with ChatGPT's Code Interpreter. Emerging and upcoming therapies in insomnia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1