生物膜的机械去除:刮除器仍然是黄金标准吗?

Q2 Dentistry Monographs in Oral Science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-21 DOI:10.1159/000510187
Klaus-Dieter Bastendorf, Nadine Strafela-Bastendorf, Adrian Lussi
{"title":"生物膜的机械去除:刮除器仍然是黄金标准吗?","authors":"Klaus-Dieter Bastendorf,&nbsp;Nadine Strafela-Bastendorf,&nbsp;Adrian Lussi","doi":"10.1159/000510187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of modern periodontal therapy, both during the initial stages and during maintenance, is to create biologically acceptable tooth surfaces through sub- and supragingival cleaning, which enables binding of the connective tissue to the greatest extent possible. In past centuries, the focus of periodontal treatment was on the removal of the supposed cause of periodontal disease, the supra- and supragingival calculus and \"infected\" root cementum. The findings on the importance of biofilm<A51_FootRef>1</A51_FootRef> (plaque) and the endogenous responses to biofilm metabolism have shifted the therapeutic focus to elimination of the biofilm. The importance of avoiding injury to the hard and soft dental tissue is nowadays of upmost importance. For classical scaling and root planing to remove mineralized deposits and \"infected\" cementum, only hand instruments were available in the past. The regular, long-term use of these tools is associated with changes in the hard and soft tooth tissues, and with pain and sensitivity experienced by the patient during and after treatment. Modern root-surface debridement primarily uses ultrasound systems to remove hard mineralized deposits. For biofilm management, air polishing devices with low-abrasive powders are increasingly gaining acceptance. With this new technology, biofilm management can now be performed much more effectively and efficiently, using materials more sparingly; this also causes less pain and discomfort for patients during and after treatment, and less fatigue for practitioners. The modern systems allow gentle, optimal biofilm management, whereas the traditional hand instruments (curettes, scalers) and classic rotating instruments used for polishing do not. Current knowledge suggests that these instruments are not best suited for biofilm management.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":"29 ","pages":"105-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical Removal of the Biofilm: Is the Curette Still the Gold Standard?\",\"authors\":\"Klaus-Dieter Bastendorf,&nbsp;Nadine Strafela-Bastendorf,&nbsp;Adrian Lussi\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000510187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The goal of modern periodontal therapy, both during the initial stages and during maintenance, is to create biologically acceptable tooth surfaces through sub- and supragingival cleaning, which enables binding of the connective tissue to the greatest extent possible. In past centuries, the focus of periodontal treatment was on the removal of the supposed cause of periodontal disease, the supra- and supragingival calculus and \\\"infected\\\" root cementum. The findings on the importance of biofilm<A51_FootRef>1</A51_FootRef> (plaque) and the endogenous responses to biofilm metabolism have shifted the therapeutic focus to elimination of the biofilm. The importance of avoiding injury to the hard and soft dental tissue is nowadays of upmost importance. For classical scaling and root planing to remove mineralized deposits and \\\"infected\\\" cementum, only hand instruments were available in the past. The regular, long-term use of these tools is associated with changes in the hard and soft tooth tissues, and with pain and sensitivity experienced by the patient during and after treatment. Modern root-surface debridement primarily uses ultrasound systems to remove hard mineralized deposits. For biofilm management, air polishing devices with low-abrasive powders are increasingly gaining acceptance. With this new technology, biofilm management can now be performed much more effectively and efficiently, using materials more sparingly; this also causes less pain and discomfort for patients during and after treatment, and less fatigue for practitioners. The modern systems allow gentle, optimal biofilm management, whereas the traditional hand instruments (curettes, scalers) and classic rotating instruments used for polishing do not. Current knowledge suggests that these instruments are not best suited for biofilm management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"volume\":\"29 \",\"pages\":\"105-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000510187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000510187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

现代牙周治疗的目标,无论是在初始阶段还是在维护过程中,都是通过龈下和龈上清洁来创造生物上可接受的牙齿表面,从而使结缔组织的结合达到最大程度。在过去的几个世纪里,牙周治疗的重点是去除所谓的牙周病的原因,即龈上和龈上的结石和“感染”的牙根骨质。关于生物膜1(斑块)的重要性和对生物膜代谢的内源性反应的发现已将治疗重点转移到消除生物膜上。避免损伤软硬牙组织的重要性是当今最重要的。为了清除矿化沉积物和“受感染”的牙骨质,传统的除垢和刨根术在过去只能使用手动器械。定期、长期使用这些工具与硬牙和软牙组织的变化以及患者在治疗期间和治疗后所经历的疼痛和敏感有关。现代根表面清创主要使用超声系统去除硬矿化沉积物。对于生物膜管理,低磨蚀性粉末的空气抛光装置越来越被接受。有了这项新技术,生物膜管理现在可以更有效和高效地进行,更节省材料;这也减少了患者在治疗期间和治疗后的疼痛和不适,减少了从业者的疲劳。现代系统允许温和的,最佳的生物膜管理,而传统的手动仪器(刮管,缩放器)和用于抛光的经典旋转仪器则不行。目前的知识表明,这些仪器不是最适合生物膜管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mechanical Removal of the Biofilm: Is the Curette Still the Gold Standard?

The goal of modern periodontal therapy, both during the initial stages and during maintenance, is to create biologically acceptable tooth surfaces through sub- and supragingival cleaning, which enables binding of the connective tissue to the greatest extent possible. In past centuries, the focus of periodontal treatment was on the removal of the supposed cause of periodontal disease, the supra- and supragingival calculus and "infected" root cementum. The findings on the importance of biofilm1 (plaque) and the endogenous responses to biofilm metabolism have shifted the therapeutic focus to elimination of the biofilm. The importance of avoiding injury to the hard and soft dental tissue is nowadays of upmost importance. For classical scaling and root planing to remove mineralized deposits and "infected" cementum, only hand instruments were available in the past. The regular, long-term use of these tools is associated with changes in the hard and soft tooth tissues, and with pain and sensitivity experienced by the patient during and after treatment. Modern root-surface debridement primarily uses ultrasound systems to remove hard mineralized deposits. For biofilm management, air polishing devices with low-abrasive powders are increasingly gaining acceptance. With this new technology, biofilm management can now be performed much more effectively and efficiently, using materials more sparingly; this also causes less pain and discomfort for patients during and after treatment, and less fatigue for practitioners. The modern systems allow gentle, optimal biofilm management, whereas the traditional hand instruments (curettes, scalers) and classic rotating instruments used for polishing do not. Current knowledge suggests that these instruments are not best suited for biofilm management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
期刊最新文献
Chapter 8: Risk Assessment: Considerations for Coronal Caries. Chapter 9.4: Operative Treatment and Monitoring of Coronal Caries in Daily Practice. Chapter 9.3: Current Concepts of Caries Removal in Daily Practice. Chapter 9.1: The Use of Fluorides in the Control of Coronal Caries. Chapter 6: Diagnostic Considerations regarding Coronal Caries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1