评估基于社区的主动监测项目的影响,解决80岁以上社区居民的护理需求:前瞻性实用试验方案和基线评估结果。

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Translational Medicine at UniSa Pub Date : 2020-10-31 eCollection Date: 2020-10-01
G Liotta, O Madaro, P Scarcella, M C Inzerilli, B Frattini, F Riccardi, N Accarino, S Mancinelli, E Terracciano, S Orlando, M C Marazzi
{"title":"评估基于社区的主动监测项目的影响,解决80岁以上社区居民的护理需求:前瞻性实用试验方案和基线评估结果。","authors":"G Liotta,&nbsp;O Madaro,&nbsp;P Scarcella,&nbsp;M C Inzerilli,&nbsp;B Frattini,&nbsp;F Riccardi,&nbsp;N Accarino,&nbsp;S Mancinelli,&nbsp;E Terracciano,&nbsp;S Orlando,&nbsp;M C Marazzi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol of a study assessing the impact of a Community-based pro-Active Monitoring Program, by measuring the effect in counteracting the adverse outcomes related to frailty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a prospective pragmatic trial will be carried out to describe the impact of an intervention on people aged>80, adjusted for relevant parameters: demographic variables, comorbidities, disability and bio-psycho-social frailty. They have been assessed with the Functional Geriatric Evaluation questionnaire that is a validated tool. Mortality, Acute Hospital Admission rates, Emergency Room Visit rates and Institutionalization rates are the main outcomes to be evaluated annually, over three years. Two groups of patients, made up by 578 cases (undergoing the intervention under study) and 607 controls have been enrolled and interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>at baseline the two groups are quite similar for age, living arrangement, comorbidity, disability and cognitive status. They differ in education, economic resources and physical status (that are better in the control group) and in social resources (that is better in the case group). The latter was expected since the intervention is focused on increasing social capital at individual and community level and aimed at improving survival among the cases as well as reducing the recourse to hospital and residential Long Term Care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed study addresses a crucial issue: assessing the impact of a <i>bottom up care</i> service consisting of social and health interventions aimed at reducing social isolation and improving access to health care services.</p>","PeriodicalId":54170,"journal":{"name":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Impact of A Community-Based Pro-Active Monitoring Program Addressing the need for Care of Community-Dwelling Citizens aged more than 80: Protocol for a Prospective Pragmatic Trial and Results of the Baseline Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"G Liotta,&nbsp;O Madaro,&nbsp;P Scarcella,&nbsp;M C Inzerilli,&nbsp;B Frattini,&nbsp;F Riccardi,&nbsp;N Accarino,&nbsp;S Mancinelli,&nbsp;E Terracciano,&nbsp;S Orlando,&nbsp;M C Marazzi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol of a study assessing the impact of a Community-based pro-Active Monitoring Program, by measuring the effect in counteracting the adverse outcomes related to frailty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a prospective pragmatic trial will be carried out to describe the impact of an intervention on people aged>80, adjusted for relevant parameters: demographic variables, comorbidities, disability and bio-psycho-social frailty. They have been assessed with the Functional Geriatric Evaluation questionnaire that is a validated tool. Mortality, Acute Hospital Admission rates, Emergency Room Visit rates and Institutionalization rates are the main outcomes to be evaluated annually, over three years. Two groups of patients, made up by 578 cases (undergoing the intervention under study) and 607 controls have been enrolled and interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>at baseline the two groups are quite similar for age, living arrangement, comorbidity, disability and cognitive status. They differ in education, economic resources and physical status (that are better in the control group) and in social resources (that is better in the case group). The latter was expected since the intervention is focused on increasing social capital at individual and community level and aimed at improving survival among the cases as well as reducing the recourse to hospital and residential Long Term Care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed study addresses a crucial issue: assessing the impact of a <i>bottom up care</i> service consisting of social and health interventions aimed at reducing social isolation and improving access to health care services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Medicine at UniSa\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8370536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Medicine at UniSa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Medicine at UniSa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是描述一项研究的方案,通过测量在抵消与虚弱相关的不良后果方面的效果,来评估基于社区的主动监测计划的影响。方法:将进行一项前瞻性实用试验,以描述干预措施对80岁以上人群的影响,并根据相关参数进行调整:人口统计学变量、合并症、残疾和生物心理社会脆弱性。他们已经用功能性老年评估问卷进行了评估,这是一种有效的工具。死亡率、急性住院率、急诊室就诊率和住院率是每年评估的主要结果,为期三年。两组患者,由578例(正在进行研究中的干预)和607例对照组成,已被纳入和访谈。结果:两组在年龄、生活安排、合并症、残疾和认知状况方面基本相同。他们在教育、经济资源和身体状况(对照组较好)和社会资源(病例组较好)方面存在差异。后者是预料之中的,因为干预的重点是增加个人和社区一级的社会资本,旨在提高病例的存活率,并减少对医院和住院长期护理的求助。结论:拟议的研究解决了一个关键问题:评估自下而上的护理服务的影响,包括旨在减少社会孤立和改善获得保健服务的机会的社会和保健干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Impact of A Community-Based Pro-Active Monitoring Program Addressing the need for Care of Community-Dwelling Citizens aged more than 80: Protocol for a Prospective Pragmatic Trial and Results of the Baseline Assessment.

The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol of a study assessing the impact of a Community-based pro-Active Monitoring Program, by measuring the effect in counteracting the adverse outcomes related to frailty.

Methods: a prospective pragmatic trial will be carried out to describe the impact of an intervention on people aged>80, adjusted for relevant parameters: demographic variables, comorbidities, disability and bio-psycho-social frailty. They have been assessed with the Functional Geriatric Evaluation questionnaire that is a validated tool. Mortality, Acute Hospital Admission rates, Emergency Room Visit rates and Institutionalization rates are the main outcomes to be evaluated annually, over three years. Two groups of patients, made up by 578 cases (undergoing the intervention under study) and 607 controls have been enrolled and interviewed.

Results: at baseline the two groups are quite similar for age, living arrangement, comorbidity, disability and cognitive status. They differ in education, economic resources and physical status (that are better in the control group) and in social resources (that is better in the case group). The latter was expected since the intervention is focused on increasing social capital at individual and community level and aimed at improving survival among the cases as well as reducing the recourse to hospital and residential Long Term Care.

Conclusion: The proposed study addresses a crucial issue: assessing the impact of a bottom up care service consisting of social and health interventions aimed at reducing social isolation and improving access to health care services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Medicine at UniSa
Translational Medicine at UniSa MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Anaesthesiologist-led Multidisciplinary Model for Evaluating High-risk Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Surgical Patients. Instrumental Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta and Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes: Literature Review and Observational Study. Physical Activity in Cancer Rehabilitation and Technology Acceptance: Results From the "Oncology in Motion" Project. Novel Targets and Strategies Addressing Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Post-acute Coronary Syndromes Patients. Telerehabilitation: A Solution for Patients After Hip Fracture?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1